| Literature DB >> 30345257 |
Joseph D Lykins1, Ekaterina V Filippova2, Andrei S Halavaty2, George Minasov2, Ying Zhou3, Ievgeniia Dubrovska2, Kristin J Flores2, Ludmilla A Shuvalova2, Jiapeng Ruan2, Kamal El Bissati3, Sarah Dovgin4, Craig W Roberts5, Stuart Woods5, Jon D Moulton6, Hong Moulton7, Martin J McPhillie8, Stephen P Muench9, Colin W G Fishwick10, Elisabetta Sabini2, Dhanasekaran Shanmugam11, David S Roos12, Rima McLeod3,13, Wayne F Anderson2, Huân M Ngô2,14.
Abstract
Toxoplasma gondii, an Apicomplexan parasite, causes significant morbidity and mortality, including severe disease in immunocompromised hosts and devastating congenital disease, with no effective treatment for the bradyzoite stage. To address this, we used the Tropical Disease Research database, crystallography, molecular modeling, and antisense to identify and characterize a range of potential therapeutic targets for toxoplasmosis. Phosphoglycerate mutase II (PGMII), nucleoside diphosphate kinase (NDK), ribulose phosphate 3-epimerase (RPE), ribose-5-phosphate isomerase (RPI), and ornithine aminotransferase (OAT) were structurally characterized. Crystallography revealed insights into the overall structure, protein oligomeric states and molecular details of active sites important for ligand recognition. Literature and molecular modeling suggested potential inhibitors and druggability. The targets were further studied with vivoPMO to interrupt enzyme synthesis, identifying the targets as potentially important to parasitic replication and, therefore, of therapeutic interest. Targeted vivoPMO resulted in statistically significant perturbation of parasite replication without concomitant host cell toxicity, consistent with a previous CRISPR/Cas9 screen showing PGM, RPE, and RPI contribute to parasite fitness. PGM, RPE, and RPI have the greatest promise for affecting replication in tachyzoites. These targets are shared between other medically important parasites and may have wider therapeutic potential.Entities:
Keywords: PPMO; Toxoplasma gondii; crystallography; nucleoside diphoshate kinase; ornithine aminotransferase; phosphoglycerate mutase; ribose-5-phosphate isomerase; ribulose-3-phosphate epimerase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30345257 PMCID: PMC6182094 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00352
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Target enzyme characterization and candidate inhibitors.
| Phosphoglycerate Mutase | Catalyzes transition from 3-phosphoglycerate to 2-phosphoglycerate; important for glycolysis | replication | Inositol hexakisphosphate, benzene hexacarboxylate, 2-hydroxy-4-phosphonobutanoate, epigallocatechin-3-gallate Xanthone derivatives | McAleese et al., | |
| Nucleoside Diphosphate Kinase | Catalyzes movement of phosphate from nucleoside triphosphate to nucleoside diphosphate (GTP + ADP –> GDP + ATP) | Stress response in RPS-13; replication | Adenosine-3-phosphate-5-phosphosulfate SU11652 | Reyes et al., | |
| Ribulose Phosphate 3-Epimerase | Converts ribulose-5-phosphate into xylulose-5-phosphate (part of Calvin cycle in plants) | Involved in pentose-phosphate pathway and the generation of nucleotides; replication; in same pathway as the R5PI; implications for plastid | D-2-Deoxyribose 5-phosphate | Wood, | |
| Ribose-5-Phosphate Isomerase | Catalyzes transition from ribose-5-phosphate to ribulose-5-phosphate (upstream of above enzyme) | important in growth phase; cell invasion; implications for plastid; cell death/ replication potentially (observed in Arabidopsis) | 4-phosphoerythronate | Igoillo-Esteve et al., | |
| Ornithine Aminotransferase | Forms first intermediate in pathway to proline from ornithine (is reversible); been implicated in eye disease | Replication | L-canaline, 5-fluoromethylornithine | Kito et al., |
Figure 1The Toxoplasma Structural Genomics Pipeline identified promising targets with good predicted druggability (Phase III) and outstanding interest to the Toxoplasma research community (Phase I, II). Toxoplasma proteins were selected for Phase I from published work up to 2009 and communicated with the research laboratories. Phase II included proteins from published and unpublished studies suggested by international researchers at the end of 2011. Phase III candidates were selected from the Tropical Diseases Research Database (TDRT). Proteins judged very unlikely to crystallize based on analysis by XtalPred were eliminated (Slabinski et al., 2007). Several structures solved have already been described (Ruan et al., 2015; Tonkin et al., 2015; Dubey et al., 2017). This crystallography pipeline remains available for production and solution of structures of proteins for scientists in the Toxoplasma research community.
Crystallization conditions, data-collection, structure determination and refinement statistics of T. gondii proteins.
| Screen conditions | 0.2 M MgCl2, 0.1 M HEPES pH 7.5, 25% PEG3350 | 0.2 M ammonium sulfate, 0.1 M Bis-Tris pH 5.5, 25% PEG3350 | 0.2 M MgCl2, 0.1 M MES, 20% PEG6000 | 2 M ammonium sulfate, 0.1 M citric acid pH 3.5 | 2.1 M DL-Malic acid pH 7.0 | 0.2 M ammonium acetate, 0.1 M Bis-Tris pH 6.5, 25% PEG3350 |
| Protein concentration (mg/ml) | 7.5 | 7.5 | 6 | 7.4 | 7.1 | 22.8 |
| Space group | ||||||
| Unit cell parameters (Å; °) | ||||||
| Resolution range (Å) | 30.00–2.60 (2.64–2.60) | 30.00–2.40 (2.44–2.40) | 30.00-1.70 (1.73-1.70) | 30.00–2.05 (2.09–2.05) | 30.00–2.60 (2.64–2.60) | 62.10–1.20 (1.22–1.20) |
| No. of reflections | 33,033 (1,604) | 75,092 (3,725) | 202,729 (10,203) | 81,012 (3,999) | 16,774 (818) | 224,574 (11,241) |
| 10.6 (64.5) | 8.4 (52.3) | 5.9 (48.2) | 7.2 (61.5) | 9.4 (61.6) | 4.3 (37.0) | |
| Completeness (%) | 100.0 (100.0) | 99.6 (99.8) | 98.5 (99.9) | 100.0 (100.0) | 100.0 (100.0) | 91.0 (91.0) |
| 〈 | 18.3 (3.3) | 18.2 (3.2) | 22 (3.2) | 20.1 (2.4) | 44.9 (5.4) | 11.2 (2.0) |
| Multiplicity | 7.3 (7.4) | 5.7 (5.8) | 4.9 (4.9) | 4.5 (4.5) | 14.2 (14.7) | 2.0 (2.0) |
| Wilson | 52.0 | 51.0 | 28.0 | 32.6 | 61.4 | 14.4 |
| MR initial model (PDB ID) | 1xq9 | 1ndl | 3qc3 | - | 3lg0 | |
| Resolution range (Å) | 29.72–2.60 (2.67–2.60) | 29.49–2.40 (2.46–2.40) | 29.98-1.7 (1.74-1.7) | 29.88–2.05 (2.10–2.05) | 29.53–2.60 (2.67–2.60) | 62.1–1.2 (1.23–1.20) |
| Completeness (%) | 99.8 (98.2) | 99.5 (99.7) | 98.2 (97.04) | 99.9 (99.9) | 99.8 (99.8) | 90.8 (90.0) |
| No. of reflections | 31,317 (2,253) | 71,019 (5,181) | 192,440 (13,960) | 76,865 (5,594) | 15,802 (1,134) | 213,305 (15,538) |
| 19.7/23.9 (25.9/27.7) | 19.2/23.8 (26.1/34.3) | 15.4/19.2 (20.8/24.6) | 14.9/18.7 (21.9/26.8) | 16.4/20.5 (25.8/34.4) | 13.3/16.5 (20.9/23.8) | |
| Protein molecules/atoms | 2/6,560 | 12/14,699 | 12/14,647 | 4/6,761 | 1/1,866 | 2/6,560 |
| Solvent atoms | 1,041 | 548 | 1854 | 513 | 71 | 1,041 |
| Mean temperature factor (Å2) | 56.3 | 48.7 | 33.4 | 39.9 | 56.8 | 18.4 |
| R.m.s.d. bonds (Å) | 0.011 | 0.007 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.012 | 0.021 |
| R.m.s.d. angles (°) | 1.626 | 1.219 | 1.398 | 1.434 | 1.711 | 1.927 |
| Most favored (%) | 90.2 | 92.8 | 95.0 | 91.8 | 95.4 | 90.2 |
| Allowed (%) | 9.0 | 6.4 | 5.0 | 8.2 | 4.1 | 9.0 |
| Generously allowed (%) | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| Outside allowed (%) | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 |
| PDB Accession Code | 4odi | 4o0n | 5bxi | 4nu7 | 4nml | 4nog |
Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell.
Statistics are based on PROCHECK (Laskowski et al., .
Figure 2Crystal structure of TgPGM (A). Ribbon representation of TgPGM monomer (left side) colored blue (N-terminus) to red (C-terminus) and tetramer of TgPGM (right side) (B). Domain structure of TgPGM [red—an α/β/α-sandwich domain (residues 12–107 and 169–257) and blue—a domain without any defined folding motif (residues 108–168)] (C). Pairwise structural alignment of TgPGM (gray) and BpPGM (cyan) showing active site with residues of TgPGM shown in sticks and labeled in one-letter code. Equivalent residues of BpPGM are displayed. BpPGM binds (2R)-2,3-diphosphoglyceric acid, DG2, in the active site.
Figure 6Crystal structure of TgOAT (A). Ribbon representation of TgOAT monomer (left side) colored blue (N-terminus) to red (C-terminus). Catalytic and N/C-termini domains with bound PLP are shown on the right (B). Dimer of TgOAT (C). Pairwise structural alignment of TgOAT (gray; PLP is shown in sticks) and hOAT with bound PLP (cyan ribbon; PDB 1oat). Residues of TgOAT are shown in sticks and labeled in one-letter code. Equivalent lysine residues of hOAT are displayed. Chain identifier in parentheses.
Figure 7(A) Schematic of Interaction Between vivoPMO and RNA. (B) Sequences for PMO. Sequences for all enzymes were designed to be complementary to regions overlapping splice sites so as to prevent appropriate interaction between mRNA and the spliceosome predicted to lead to the production of a non-functional protein product.
Figure 3Crystal structure of TgNDK (A). Ribbon representation of TgNDK monomer (left side) colored blue (N-terminus) to red (C-terminus) and trimeric and hexameric assemblies of TgNDK (middle and right side) (B). Pairwise structural alignment of TgPGM (gray; SO4 is shown in sticks) and human NM23-H2 transcription factor [cyan (chain E with bound 2′-deoxyguanosine-5′-monophosphate (DG) and 2′-deoxyadenosine-5′-monophosphate (DA)] and magenta [chain B with bound 2′-deoxyguanosine-5′-monophosphate (DG)] showing active site with residues of TgNDK shown in sticks and labeled in one-letter code. Equivalent residues of human NM23-H2 transcription factor are displayed.
Figure 4Crystal structure of TgRPE (A). Ribbon representation of TgRPE monomer (left side) colored blue (N-terminus) to red (C-terminus) and TgRPE dimer (right side) (B). Pairwise structural alignment of TgRPE (gray; SO4 is shown in sticks and Zn2+ as green sphere) and human RPE with bound Fe2+ (yellow ribbon), 5-O-phosphono-D-xylulose (5SR; magenta ribbon), and ribulose-5-phosphate (5RP; cyan ribbon) showing active site with residues of TgRPE are shown in sticks and labeled in one-letter code. Equivalent residues of human RPE are displayed.
Figure 5Crystal structure of TgRPI (A). Ribbon representation of TgRPI monomer (left side) colored blue (N-terminus) to red (C-terminus). Catalytic domain and oligomerization domain of TgRPI with bound D-malate (MLT; sticks) and chloride ion (Cl−; green sphere) are shown on the right. (B). Unstable and stable TgRPI dimers according to PISA prediction (C). Pairwise structural alignment of TgRPI (gray; MLT is shown in sticks and Cl− as green sphere) and TtRPI (cyan ribbon) with bound arabinose 5-phosphate (A5P; sticks) showing active site with residues of TgRPI are shown in sticks and labeled in one-letter code. Equivalent residues of TtRPI are displayed. Water molecules are shown as small red spheres.
Figure 8(A) YFP/vivoPMO Efficacy Assay at 10 μM. Targeted vivoPMOs show statistically significant knockdown relative to off-target and to a standardized parasite concentration as determined by student t-test. (B) Wst-1 Cell Viability/ vivoPMO Toxicity Assay at 10 μM. Targeted vivoPMOs do not show statistically significantly (p < 0.05 by student T-test) different levels of optical density relative to off-target vivoPMO or uninfected fibroblasts at 10 μM concentrations. (C) Ratio of On- to Off-Target vivoPMO for Replicate Experiments Using 10 μM of Targeted vivoPMO. The data presented here represent five replicate experiments. Lower individual values suggest a larger effect of the morpholino.
Figure 9Immunofluorescence Assay. This series of images depict the localization of nucleoside diphosphate kinase, one of the molecular targets herein discussed. Note the concentration of red fluorescence at the periphery of the parasite. This is consistent with the localization of secreted proteins like Gra1, suggesting that NDK could be secreted by the parasite. This has precedents in other pathogens, including M. tuberculosis and Leishmania.
Figure 10Summary figure showing the T. gondii drug discovery pipeline as described herein. The TDR Database provided important initial insights into potentially important parasite proteins (Agüero et al., 2008; Magariños et al., 2012). Identification of proteins amenable to crystallographic analysis, solution of their structures, abrogation with vivoPMO and confirmation of essentiality by querying the CRISPR/Cas9 database completed the pathway, identifying enriched targets with improved therapeutic potential.