Literature DB >> 30344453

A Comprehensive Comparative Study on Inductive and Ultrasonic Wireless Power Transmission to Biomedical Implants.

Ahmed Ibrahim1, Miao Meng1, Mehdi Kiani1.   

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive comparison between inductive coupling and ultrasound for wireless power transmission (WPT) to biomedical implants. Several sets of inductive and ultrasonic links for different powering distances (d 12) and receiver dimensions have been optimized, and their key parameters, including power transmission efficiency (PTE) and power delivered to the load (PDL) within safety constraints, have been compared to find out which method is optimal for any given condition. Two design procedures have been presented for maximizing the PTE of inductive and ultrasonic links by finding the optimal geometry for the transmitter (Tx) and receiver (Rx) coils and ultrasonic transducers as well as the optimal operation frequency (fp ). Our simulation and measurement results showed that the ultrasonic link transcends the inductive link in PTE and somewhat in PDL for a small Rx of 1.1 mm3 (diameter of 1.2 mm), particularly when the Rx was deeply implanted inside the tissue (d 12 ≥ 10 mm). However, for a larger 20 mm3 Rx (diameter of 5 mm), the inductive link achieved higher PTE and PDL, particularly at shorter distances (d 12 < 30 mm). The optimal loading condition is shown to be quite different in inductive and ultrasonic links. Despite higher performance for small Rx and large d 12, the ultrasonic link is more sensitive to Rx misalignments and orientations. This led us to propose a new design procedure based on the worst-case misalignment scenario. The simulation results have been validated by measurements. The inductive and ultrasonic links, operating at 30 MHz and 1.1 MHz, achieved measured PTEs of 0.05% and 0.65% for the 1.1 mm3 Rx located 30 mm inside tissue and oil environments with optimal load resistances of 295 Ω and 3.8 kΩ, respectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Wireless power transmission; biomedical implants; design methodology; efficiency; inductive links; ultrasound

Year:  2018        PMID: 30344453      PMCID: PMC6192045          DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2018.2812420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Sens J        ISSN: 1530-437X            Impact factor:   3.301


  31 in total

1.  Ultrasonic beamforming system for interrogating multiple implantable sensors.

Authors:  Jose M Carmena; Jan M Rabaey; Elad Alon; Bernhard E Boser; Michel M Maharbiz
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2015-08

Review 2.  Brain-machine interfaces: past, present and future.

Authors:  Mikhail A Lebedev; Miguel A L Nicolelis
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues.

Authors:  S Gabriel; R W Lau; C Gabriel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Optimal Design of Wireless Power Transmission Links for Millimeter-Sized Biomedical Implants.

Authors:  Dukju Ahn; Maysam Ghovanloo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 3.833

Review 5.  Wireless Power Transfer Strategies for Implantable Bioelectronics.

Authors:  Kush Agarwal; Rangarajan Jegadeesan; Yong-Xin Guo; Nitish V Thakor
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-03-16

6.  Continuous wave measurements of acoustic attenuation in an oil/polymer mixture.

Authors:  F E Fyke; J F Greenleaf; S A Johnson
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  A 100-channel hermetically sealed implantable device for chronic wireless neurosensing applications.

Authors:  Ming Yin; David A Borton; Juan Aceros; William R Patterson; Arto V Nurmikko
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.833

8.  Design and Optimization of Ultrasonic Wireless Power Transmission Links for Millimeter-Sized Biomedical Implants.

Authors:  Miao Meng; Mehdi Kiani
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.833

Review 9.  Cochlear implants: system design, integration, and evaluation.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Stephen Rebscher; William Harrison; Xiaoan Sun; Haihong Feng
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11-05

10.  Optogenetics.

Authors:  Karl Deisseroth
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  5 in total

1.  A Dual-Band Wireless Power Transmission System for Evaluating mm-Sized Implants.

Authors:  Yaoyao Jia; S Abdollah Mirbozorgi; Pengcheng Zhang; Omer T Inan; Wen Li; Maysam Ghovanloo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.833

2.  Design and Optimization of Ultrasonic Links With Phased Arrays for Wireless Power Transmission to Biomedical Implants.

Authors:  Zeinab Kashani; Sheikh Jawad Ilham; Mehdi Kiani
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 5.234

3.  Fully implantable wireless batteryless vascular electronics with printed soft sensors for multiplex sensing of hemodynamics.

Authors:  Robert Herbert; Hyo-Ryoung Lim; Bruno Rigo; Woon-Hong Yeo
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 14.957

4.  An ultrasound-induced wireless power supply based on AlN piezoelectric micromachined ultrasonic transducers.

Authors:  Zhicong Rong; Menglun Zhang; Yuan Ning; Wei Pang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Gastric Seed: Towards Distributed Ultrasonically Interrogated Millimeter-Sized Implants for Large-Scale Gastric Electrical-Wave Recording.

Authors:  Miao Meng; Mehdi Kiani
Journal:  IEEE Trans Circuits Syst II Express Briefs       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.691

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.