Grace Kong1,2, Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg3, Michael S Hofman4,5, Tim Akhurst4,5, Amichay Meirovitz6, Ofra Maimon6, Yodphat Krausz7, Jeremy Godefroy7, Michael Michael5,8, David J Gross3, Rodney J Hicks4,5,9. 1. Centre for Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia. Grace.kong@petermac.org. 2. Neuroendocrine Service, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Grace.kong@petermac.org. 3. Neuroendocrine Tumour Unit, Endocrinology and Metabolism Department, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel. 4. Centre for Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia. 5. Neuroendocrine Service, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 6. Oncology Department and Radiation Therapy Unit, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. 7. Nuclear Medicine Department, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel. 8. Divison Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 9. The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, the University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Rectal neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) is more common than other NEN origins, but is less commonly metastatic. However, when present, distant disease carries a particularly poor prognosis. Evidence guiding optimal treatment of such patients is lacking. We assessed PRRT outcomes in patients with somatostatin receptor (SSTR) positive metastatic rectal NEN from two referral centres. METHODS: Patients treated with PRRT were retrospectively reviewed. Morphologic (RECIST 1.1), SSTR imaging responses and toxicity were assessed 3 months post-PRRT. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to determine progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from start of PRRT. RESULTS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients (M = 20, age 31-81 years) were reviewed. The majority (70%) had ENETs grade 2 disease (19 patients), three had Grade 3, one Grade 1, and four not documented. Overall, 63% (10/16 patients with available FDG PET/CT) had FDG avid disease. Twenty-six patients were treated for disease progression. Most had 177Lu-DOTA-octreotate with median cumulative activity of 30 GBq, median four cycles. 14 patients had radiosensitising chemotherapy (5FU or capecitabine). At 3 months post-PRRT, CT disease control rate (DCR) was 96%: partial response was observed in 70% (19/27) and stable disease in 26%. All but one had partial SSTR imaging response. The median PFS was 29 months. Ten patients died, with median overall survival 81 months with a median follow-up of 67 months. Seventeen patients had further treatments after initial PRRT (10 had further cycles of PRRT). Three patients had grade 3 lymphopenia, without significant renal toxicity, MDS or leukaemia. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate high efficacy and morphologic responses with minimal toxicity and very encouraging survival from PRRT in patients with metastatic rectal NEN despite the adverse prognostic features of this cohort. Further prospective PRRT trials are warranted in this subgroup.
PURPOSE:Rectal neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) is more common than other NEN origins, but is less commonly metastatic. However, when present, distant disease carries a particularly poor prognosis. Evidence guiding optimal treatment of such patients is lacking. We assessed PRRT outcomes in patients with somatostatin receptor (SSTR) positive metastatic rectal NEN from two referral centres. METHODS:Patients treated with PRRT were retrospectively reviewed. Morphologic (RECIST 1.1), SSTR imaging responses and toxicity were assessed 3 months post-PRRT. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to determine progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from start of PRRT. RESULTS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients (M = 20, age 31-81 years) were reviewed. The majority (70%) had ENETs grade 2 disease (19 patients), three had Grade 3, one Grade 1, and four not documented. Overall, 63% (10/16 patients with available FDG PET/CT) had FDG avid disease. Twenty-six patients were treated for disease progression. Most had 177Lu-DOTA-octreotate with median cumulative activity of 30 GBq, median four cycles. 14 patients had radiosensitising chemotherapy (5FU or capecitabine). At 3 months post-PRRT, CT disease control rate (DCR) was 96%: partial response was observed in 70% (19/27) and stable disease in 26%. All but one had partial SSTR imaging response. The median PFS was 29 months. Ten patients died, with median overall survival 81 months with a median follow-up of 67 months. Seventeen patients had further treatments after initial PRRT (10 had further cycles of PRRT). Three patients had grade 3 lymphopenia, without significant renal toxicity, MDS or leukaemia. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate high efficacy and morphologic responses with minimal toxicity and very encouraging survival from PRRT in patients with metastatic rectal NEN despite the adverse prognostic features of this cohort. Further prospective PRRT trials are warranted in this subgroup.
Authors: R Garcia-Carbonero; H Sorbye; E Baudin; E Raymond; B Wiedenmann; B Niederle; E Sedlackova; C Toumpanakis; M Anlauf; J B Cwikla; M Caplin; D O'Toole; A Perren Journal: Neuroendocrinology Date: 2016-01-05 Impact factor: 4.914
Authors: J K Ramage; W W De Herder; G Delle Fave; P Ferolla; D Ferone; T Ito; P Ruszniewski; A Sundin; W Weber; Z Zheng-Pei; B Taal; A Pascher Journal: Neuroendocrinology Date: 2016-01-05 Impact factor: 4.914
Authors: Jonathan Strosberg; Ghassan El-Haddad; Edward Wolin; Andrew Hendifar; James Yao; Beth Chasen; Erik Mittra; Pamela L Kunz; Matthew H Kulke; Heather Jacene; David Bushnell; Thomas M O'Dorisio; Richard P Baum; Harshad R Kulkarni; Martyn Caplin; Rachida Lebtahi; Timothy Hobday; Ebrahim Delpassand; Eric Van Cutsem; Al Benson; Rajaventhan Srirajaskanthan; Marianne Pavel; Jaime Mora; Jordan Berlin; Enrique Grande; Nicholas Reed; Ettore Seregni; Kjell Öberg; Maribel Lopera Sierra; Paola Santoro; Thomas Thevenet; Jack L Erion; Philippe Ruszniewski; Dik Kwekkeboom; Eric Krenning Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-01-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ben Lawrence; Bjorn I Gustafsson; Anthony Chan; Bernhard Svejda; Mark Kidd; Irvin M Modlin Journal: Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 4.741
Authors: E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Daniel Castellano; Emilio Bajetta; Ashok Panneerselvam; Stephen Saletan; Walter Kocha; Thomas O'Dorisio; Lowell B Anthony; Timothy Hobday Journal: Oncologist Date: 2012-12-21
Authors: Brett Weinstock; Stephen C Ward; Noam Harpaz; Richard R P Warner; Steven Itzkowitz; Michelle Kang Kim Journal: Neuroendocrinology Date: 2013-11-05 Impact factor: 4.914
Authors: Arvind Dasari; Chan Shen; Daniel Halperin; Bo Zhao; Shouhao Zhou; Ying Xu; Tina Shih; James C Yao Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Sami Matrood; Leonidas Apostolidis; Jörg Schrader; Sebastian Krug; Harald Lahner; Annette Ramaswamy; Damiano Librizzi; Zoltan Kender; Anke Kröcher; Simon Kreutzfeldt; Thomas Matthias Gress; Anja Rinke Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2021-10-06 Impact factor: 5.555