Literature DB >> 30342952

Three-Dimensional Host Bone Coverage Required in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip and Its Relationship With 2-Dimensional Coverage.

Takuro Ueno1, Tamon Kabata1, Yoshitomo Kajino1, Takaaki Ohmori1, Junya Yoshitani1, Hiroyuki Tsuchiya1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In total hip arthroplasty, the minimum host bone coverage required on the cup for stable fixation has been previously reported; however, the coverage was generally evaluated on a 2-dimensional (2D) image and 3-dimensional (3D) coverage has not been well described.
METHODS: We used postoperative computed tomography images to retrospectively measure 3D cup coverage in 151 hips with developmental dysplasia of the hip that underwent primary total hip arthroplasty. The aims were to (1) determine the minimum requirement of the 3D coverage for stable cup fixation; (2) evaluate the relationship between 2D and 3D coverage; and (3) identify the factors associated with 2D-3D discrepancy, defined as follows: 2D-3D discrepancy = 2D coverage-3D coverage.
RESULTS: All cups showed stable fixation as demonstrated by bone ingrowth with an average postoperative period of 48 months. The minimum 3D coverage was 61.2%, with a mean value of 77.1% ± 6.7% and maximum value of 97.6%. We found a significant positive but poor relationship between 3D and 2D coverage (bone coverage index; r = 0.30). Consequently, the 2D-3D discrepancy varied greatly, with a mean value of -1.6% ± 12.3% (range, -36.5% to 32.2%). Multiple linear regression analyses confirmed that lower cup center and anterior tilt of the pelvis relative to the computed tomography table were independent factors associated with increasing 2D-3D discrepancy.
CONCLUSION: This study showed that 2D coverage, measured on a projected image, carries a risk of overestimation, especially in hips with the aforementioned features.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthroplasty; cup fixation; dysplasia; host bone coverage; three-dimensional coverage

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30342952     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  5 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Tilt-adjusted Cup Anteversion in Patients with Severe Backward Pelvic Tilt is Associated with the Risk of Iliopsoas Impingement: A Three-dimensional Implantation Simulation.

Authors:  Thomas Ilchmann
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Best bone of acetabulum for cup component placement in Crowe types I to III dysplastic hips: a computer simulation study.

Authors:  Lin-Li Zheng; Yang-Yang Lin; Xiao-Yan Zhang; Qian-Hui Ling; Wei-Ming Liao; Pei-Hui Wu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  Patient-specific total hip arthroplasty is superior to conventional methods for Crowe III and IV adult developmental hip dysplasia: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Chenggong Wang; Yusheng Li; Yihe Hu; Hua Liu; Long Wang; Jie Xie; Han Xiao; Shilong Su; Fawei Gao; Da Zhong
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-02

4.  Radiographic assessment of radiolucent lines around a highly porous titanium cup (Tritanium) using digital tomosynthesis, after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kazuki Oishi; Yuji Yamamoto; Yoshifumi Harada; Ryo Inoue; Eiji Sasaki; Yasuyuki Ishibashi
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Risk factors for pressure ulcers from the use of a pelvic positioner in hip surgery: a retrospective observational cohort study in 229 patients.

Authors:  Takuro Ueno; Tamon Kabata; Yoshitomo Kajino; Daisuke Inoue; Takaaki Ohmori; Junya Yoshitani; Ken Ueoka; Yuki Yamamuro; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2020-04-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.