Saum Ghodoussipour1, Hooman Djaladat2. 1. Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA. 2. Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA. djaladat@med.usc.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of the study is to review and summarize major additions to the literature as pertains to enhanced recovery protocols after radical cystectomy in the past year. RECENT FINDINGS: Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols is multimodal pathways that include elements to optimize all stages of care including preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative measures. Several authors have recently presented their results with initial implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol after radical cystectomy, while others have begun to examine outcomes beyond the index admission and to refine the various targeted components of the protocol. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols has revolutionized patient care following radical cystectomy, a procedure still burdened by high complication rates and lengthy hospital stay. Although still lacking in universal implementation and standardization of the protocol, significant advancements are made each year as we move towards best practice.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of the study is to review and summarize major additions to the literature as pertains to enhanced recovery protocols after radical cystectomy in the past year. RECENT FINDINGS: Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols is multimodal pathways that include elements to optimize all stages of care including preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative measures. Several authors have recently presented their results with initial implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol after radical cystectomy, while others have begun to examine outcomes beyond the index admission and to refine the various targeted components of the protocol. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols has revolutionized patient care following radical cystectomy, a procedure still burdened by high complication rates and lengthy hospital stay. Although still lacking in universal implementation and standardization of the protocol, significant advancements are made each year as we move towards best practice.
Authors: Juan Chipollini; Dominic H Tang; Karim Hussein; Sephalie Y Patel; Rosemarie E Garcia-Getting; Julio M Pow-Sang; Scott M Gilbert; Wade J Sexton; Philippe E Spiess; Michael A Poch Journal: Urology Date: 2017-03-23 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Takahiro Osawa; Sapan N Ambani; Kola Olugbade; Ted A Skolarus; Alon Z Weizer; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Chang He; Khaled S Hafez; Brent K Hollenbeck; Cheryl T Lee; James E Montie; Ganesh S Palapattu; Todd M Morgan Journal: Urology Date: 2016-12-21 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Alice Semerjian; Niv Milbar; Max Kates; Michael A Gorin; Hiten D Patel; Heather J Chalfin; Steven M Frank; Christopher L Wu; William W Yang; Deb Hobson; Lindsay Robertson; Elizabeth Wick; Mark P Schoenberg; Phillip M Pierorazio; Michael H Johnson; C J Stimson; Trinity J Bivalacqua Journal: Urology Date: 2017-10-13 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Paul S Myles; Rinaldo Bellomo; Tomas Corcoran; Andrew Forbes; Philip Peyton; David Story; Chris Christophi; Kate Leslie; Shay McGuinness; Rachael Parke; Jonathan Serpell; Matthew T V Chan; Thomas Painter; Stuart McCluskey; Gary Minto; Sophie Wallace Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-05-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: C S Voskuilen; E E Fransen van de Putte; J Bloos-van der Hulst; E van Werkhoven; W M de Blok; B W G van Rhijn; S Horenblas; R P Meijer Journal: World J Urol Date: 2017-11-22 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Alireza Ghoreifi; Michael F Basin; Saum Ghodoussipour; Soroush T Bazargani; Erfan Amini; Mohammad Aslzare; Jie Cai; Gus Miranda; Shihab Sugeir; Sumeet Bhanvadia; Anne K Schuckman; Siamak Daneshmand; Philip Lumb; Hooman Djaladat Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 2.370