Literature DB >> 30337915

Differential Usefulness of Nine Commonly Used Genetic Markers for Identifying Phytophthora Species.

Xiao Yang1, Chuanxue Hong1.   

Abstract

The genus Phytophthora is agriculturally and ecologically important. As the number of Phytophthora species continues to grow, identifying isolates in this genus has become increasingly challenging even by DNA sequencing. This study evaluated nine commonly used genetic markers against 154 formally described and 17 provisionally named Phytophthora species. These genetic markers were the cytochrome-c oxidase 1 (cox1), internal transcribed spacer region (ITS), 60S ribosomal protein L10, beta-tubulin (β-tub), elongation factor 1 alpha, enolase, heat shock protein 90, 28S ribosomal DNA, and tigA gene fusion protein (tigA). As indicated by species distance, cox1 had the highest genus-wide resolution, followed by ITS, tigA, and β-tub. Resolution of these four markers also varied with (sub)clade. β-tub alone could readily identify all species in clade 1, cox1 for clade 2, and tigA for clades 7 and 8. Two or more genetic markers were required to identify species in other clades. For PCR consistency, ITS (99% PCR success rate) and β-tub (96%) were easier to amplify than cox1 (75%) and tigA (71%). Accordingly, it is recommended to take a two-step approach: classifying unknown Phytophthora isolates to clade by ITS sequences, as this marker is easy to amplify and its signature sequences are readily available, then identifying to species by one or more of the most informative markers for the respective (sub)clade.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genetics; oomycetes; plant destroyers; plant disease diagnosis; plant pathology

Year:  2018        PMID: 30337915      PMCID: PMC6178919          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


Introduction

The genus Phytophthora currently consists of approximately 200 formal and provisional species with many high-impact plant pathogens (Erwin and Ribeiro, 1996; Yang et al., 2017). For example, P. infestans and P. sojae are major threats to potato and soybean production, respectively (Erwin and Ribeiro, 1996). Phytophthora ramorum (Goheen et al., 2002; Rizzo et al., 2002, 2005) and P. cinnamomi (Zentmyer, 1980; Shearer et al., 2004) are destructive forest pathogens causing tree decline in the U.S. and Australia, respectively. Identifying Phytophthora isolates to species is the first and critical step to support plant biosecurity. This process is now done primarily by DNA sequencing. Concerted efforts have been made to identify genetic markers and improve the accuracy of DNA sequence-based identification. As a result, a variety of markers have been identified and utilized (Cooke et al., 2000; Martin and Tooley, 2003; Kroon et al., 2004; Blair et al., 2008; Robideau et al., 2014). Meanwhile, many signature sequences from ex-types (type-derived cultures) and authentic isolates (representative isolates designated by the originators of the respective species) have been generated (Cooke et al., 2000; Kroon et al., 2004; Blair et al., 2008; Martin et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2017), although their availability in public repositories depends upon species (Kang et al., 2010). These two lines of advancement have raised several questions of practical importance. What genetic markers are most useful? Is their resolution dependent upon (sub)clade? How many markers are required to identify Phytophthora isolates within a respective (sub)clade to species? Answers to the above and other related questions will help identifying Phytophthora species accurately in the timeliest fashion and at the lowest cost. To this end, Martin et al. (2012) indicated that a set of genetic markers may be required for the most accurate identification. These included the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS), 60S ribosomal protein L10 (60S), beta-tubulin (β-tub), elongation factor 1 alpha (EF-1α), enolase (ENL), heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90), 28S ribosomal DNA (28S), tigA gene fusion protein (tigA), cytochrome-c oxidase 1 and 2 (cox1 and cox2), subunit 9 of NADH dehydrogenase (nad9), ribosomal protein S10 (rps10), and SecY protein (secY) coding regions. Correspondingly, reference sequences from various markers have been compiled for many known Phytophthora species (Cooke et al., 2000; Kroon et al., 2004; Blair et al., 2008; Grünwald et al., 2011; Park et al., 2013; Martin et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2017). In separate studies, Martin et al. (2014) and Martin and Tooley (2003) provided the average pairwise species distances for the concatenated nuclear and mitochondrial genes, and five mitochondrial markers, namely cox1&2, nad9, rps10, and secY. The objectives of this study were to evaluate nine commonly used genetic markers against more than 170 Phytophthora taxa and identify the most informative markers for individual (sub)clades.

Materials and methods

Sequence selection

Nine common genetic markers, namely ITS, cox1, 60S, β-tub, EF-1α, ENL, Hsp90, 28S, and tigA, were evaluated. Sequences of 180 Phytophthora isolates representing 154 described and 17 provisionally named species were analyzed. These included 116 ex-types and 28 authentic isolates (Table 1). Eight taxa were represented by two or three isolates due to the lack of sequence data for all regions of individual isolates. The majority of 60S, β-tub, EF-1α, ENL, Hsp90, 28S, and tigA sequences originated from two previous studies (Blair et al., 2008; Yang et al., 2017). ITS and cox1 sequences of 90 and 79 Phytophthora species, respectively, were downloaded from GenBank (Benson et al., 2018). Sequences from P. sp. ohioensis (ST18-37) were obtained from the Phytophthora Database (Park et al., 2013). Seventy-nine and 86 isolates were sequenced for ITS and cox1, respectively in this study as described below to fill the signature sequence gaps in current public repositories.
Table 1

Information and GenBank accession numbers of isolates used in this study.

(Sub) cladeaSpeciesIsolate identificationbTypecHost or substrateLocationYearGenBank accession no.d
CHCBSATCCIMIWPCcox1ITS60Sβ-tubEF-1αENLHsp9028StigA
1aP. cactorum22E6P10194Rhododendron sp.Ohio, USAn.a.eMH620014MH620100KX250369KX250370KX250371KX250372KX250373KX250374KX250375
P. hedraiandra62A5111725P19523TViburnum sp.The Netherlands2001AY769115AY707987KX250397KX250398KX250399KX250400KX250401KX250402KX250403
P. idaei34D4971.95MYA-4065313728P6767TRubus idaeusScotland, UK1987FJ801946EU080129EU080130EU080131EU080132EU080133EU080134EU080135
P. idaei313727AAY564185
P. pseudotsugae52938331662P10339TPsendotsuga menziesiiOregon, USA1975AY564199FJ802112EU080426EU080427EU080428EU080429EU080430EU080431EU080432
1bP. clandestina32G1347.8658713, 60438278933P3943TTrifolium subterraneumAustralia1985MH620101EU079866EU079867EU079868EU079869EU079870EU079871EU079872
P. clandestina287317AY564172
P. iranica61J4374.7260237158964P3882TSolanum melongenaIran1969AY564189MH620102KX250439KX250440KX250441KX250442KX250443KX250444KX250445
P. tentaculata30G8MYA-3655Argyranthemum frutescensGermany2004MH620015MH620103KX250453KX250454KX250455KX250456KX250457KX250458KX250459
1cP. andinaP13365TSolanum brevifoliumEcuador2001FJ801734EU080182EU080183EU080184EU080185EU080186EU080187EU080188
P. andinaAAY564160
P. infestans27A8Solanum tuberosumMexico1992KC733447KC733443KX250474KX250475KX250476KX250477KX250478KX250479KX250480
P. ipomoeae31B5109229P10225TIpomoea longipedunculataMexico1999MH620016MH620104EU080830EU080831EU080832EU080833EU080834EU080835EU080836
P. mirabilis30C164069, MYA-4062P3006AMirabilis jalapaMexicon.a.MH620017MH620105KX250481KX250482KX250483KX250484KX250485KX250486KX250487
P. phaseoli23B4Phaseolus lunatusDelaware, USA2000MH620018MH620106KX250495KX250496KX250497KX250498KX250499KX250500KX250501
1P. nicotianae22F915410, MYA-4037Nicotiana tabacumNorth Carolina, USAn.a.KF317091KF317070KX250509KX250510KX250511KX250512KX250513KX250514KX250515
2aP. botryosa62C6581.69136915P3425THevea brasiliensisMalaysia1966MH620019MH620107KX250537KX250538KX250539KX250540KX250541KX250542KX250543
P. citrophthora03E5Irrigation waterVirginia, USA2000KF317096KF317075KX250544KX250545KX250546KX250547KX250548KX250549KX250550
P. colocasiae35D3Colocasia esculentaHawaii, USA2005KF317097KF317076KX250565KX250566KX250567KX250568KX250569KX250570KX250571
P. himalsilva61G2128767TQuercus leucotricophoraNepal2005MH620020MH620108KX250572KX250573KX250574KX250575KX250576KX250577KX250578
P. meadii61J9219.88129185Hevea brasiliensisIndia1987AY564192MH620109KX250593KX250594KX250595KX250596KX250597KX250598KX250599
P. occultans65B9101557TBuxus sempervirensThe Netherlands1998MH620021JX978155KX250600KX250601KX250602KX250603KX250604KX250605KX250606
P. terminalis65B8133865TPachysandra terminalisThe Netherlands2010JX978168JX978167KX250607KX250608KX250609KX250610KX250611KX250612KX250613
2bP. amaranthiTAmaranthus tricolorTaiwan2008n.a.GU111585n.a.KJ179949n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.
P. capsici22F415399, MYA-4034ACapsicum annumNew Mexico, USA1948KF317094KF317073KX250635KX250636KX250637KX250638KX250639KX250640KX250641
P. glovera62B4121969P11685TNicotiana tabacumBrazil1995MH620022MH620110KX250649KX250650KX250651KX250652KX250653KX250654KX250655
P. mengei42B2MYA-4554TPersea americanaCalifornia, USAn.a.MH620023EU748545KX250656KX250657KX250658KX250659KX250660KX250661KX250662
P. mexicana45G4554.884673192550P0646Solanum lycopersicumArgentinan.a.MH620024MH620111KX250670KX250671KX250672KX250673KX250674KX250675KX250676
P. siskiyouensis41B7122779MYA-4187P15122TStream waterOregon, USA2003KF317102KF317081KX250677KX250678KX250679KX250680KX250681KX250682KX250683
P. tropicalis35C8434.9176651, MYA-4218TMacadamia integrifoliaHawaii, USAn.a.MH620025MH620112KX250698KX250699KX250700KX250701KX250702KX250703KX250704
P. sp. brasiliensis46705P0630ATheobroma cacaoBrazil1969n.a.GU259388EU080419EU080420EU080421EU080422EU080423EU080424EU080425
2cP. acerina61H1133931TAcer pseudoplatanusItaly2010MH620026JX951285KX250712KX250713KX250714KX250715KX250716KX250717KX250718
P. capensis62C1128319P1819TCurtisia dentataSouth African.a.MH620027MH620113KX250726KX250727KX250728KX250729KX250730KX250731KX250732
P. citricola33H8221.886044021173P0716TCitrus sinensisTaiwan1987KF317095KF317074KX250747KX250748KX250749KX250750KX250751KX250752KX250753
P. multivora55C5124094TSoilWestern Australia, Australia2007FJ237508FJ237521KX250775KX250776KX250777KX250778KX250779KX250780KX250781
P. pachypleura61H7502404TAcuba japonicaUK2008MH620028MH620114KX250789KX250790KX250791KX250792KX250793KX250794KX250795
P. pini45F164532TPinus resinosaMinnesota, USA1925KF317100KF317079KX250810KX250811KX250812KX250813KX250814KX250815KX250816
P. plurivora22E9MYA-3657AKalmia latifoliaWestern Australia, Australia1998KF317101KF317080KX250817KX250818KX250819KX250820KX250821KX250822KX250823
P. taxon emzansi61F2AAgathosma betulinaSouth Africa2005MH620029MH620115KX250859KX250860KX250861KX250862KX250863KX250864KX250865
2dP. bisheria31E6122081P10117TFragaria × ananassaNorth Carolina, USA1999MH620030MH620116EU080741EU080742EU080743EU080744EU080745EU080746EU080747
P. elongata55C4125799TSoilWestern Australia, Australia2004MH620031MH620117KX250894KX250895KX250896KX250897KX250898KX250899KX250900
P. frigida47G8TEucalyptus smithiSouth Africa2001KF317098KF317077KX250915KX250916KX250917KX250918KX250919KX250920KX250921
2eP. multivesiculata29E3545.96P10410TCymbidium sp.The Netherlandsn.a.MH620032MH620118EU080065EU080066EU080067EU080068EU080069EU080070EU080071
P. taxon aquatilis38J5MYA-4577AStream waterVirginia, USA2006KF317103FJ666126KX250929KX250930KX250931KX250932KX250933KX250934KX250935
3P. ilicis62A7114348TIlex aquifoliumThe Netherlandsn.a.JX524159JX524158KX250950KX250951KX250952KX250953KX250954KX250955KX250956
P. nemorosa41C4MYA-2948TLithocarpus densiflorusCalifornia, USAn.a.KF317104KF317082KX250964KX250965KX250966KX250967KX250968KX250969KX250970
P. pluvialis60B3MYA-4930TRainwaterOregon, USA2008MH620033MH620119KX250971KX250972KX250973KX250974KX250975KX250976KX250977
P. pseudosyringae30A8111772MYA-4222TQuercus roburGermany1997KF317105KF317083KX250978KX250979KX250980KX250981KX250982KX250983KX250984
P. psychrophila29J5803.95TQuercus roburGermany1995KF358239KF358227KX250992KX250993KX250994KX250995KX250996KX250997KX250998
4P. alticola47G5121939P16948AEucalyptus dunniiSouth African.a.KF317106KF317084KX251006KX251007KX251008KX251009KX251010KX251011KX251012
P. arenaria55C2127950TSoilWestern Australia, Australia2009MH620034MH620120KX251013KX251014KX251015KX251016KX251017KX251018KX251019
P. boodjera138637SoilWestern Australia, Australia2012KJ396688KJ372244n.a.KJ372283n.a.KJ396738KJ396710n.a.n.a.
P. megakarya61J5238.8342100202077TTheobroma cacaoCameroonn.a.MH620035MH620121KX251034KX251035KX251036KX251037KX251038KX251039KX251040
P. palmivora22G9MYA-4038Theobroma cacaoCosta Rican.a.KF317108KF317086KX251055KX251056KX251057KX251058KX251059KX251060KX251061
P. quercetorum15C7SoilSouth Carolina, USA1997KF358240KF358228KX251062KX251063KX251064KX251065KX251066KX251067KX251068
P. quercina30A5784.95MYA-4084TQuercus roburGermany1995KF358241KF358229KX252654KX252655KX252656KX252657KX252658KX252659KX252660
P. sp. ohioensisST18-37ASoilOhio, USA2006n.a.Phytophthora DatabasePhytophthora DatabasePhytophthora DatabasePhytophthora DatabasePhytophthora DatabasePhytophthora DatabasePhytophthora DatabasePhytophthora Database
5P. agathidicida67D5P15175TAgathis australisNew Zealand2006MH620036KP295308KX251076KX251077KX251078KX251079KX251080KX251081KX251082
P. castaneae61J7587.8536818325914TSoilTaiwann.a.AY564190MH620122KX251097KX251098KX251099KX251100KX251101KX251102KX251103
P. cocois67D6TCocos nuciferaHawaii, USA1990MH620037KP295304KX251104KX251105KX251106KX251107KX251108KX251109KX251110
P. heveae22J1296.29180616THeavae sp.Malaysian.a.AY564182MH620123KX251111KX251112KX251113KX251114KX251115KX251116KX251117
6aP. balyanboodja143058SoilWestern Australia, Australia2011MF326863KJ372258n.a.MF326806n.a.n.a.MF326892n.a.n.a.
P. condilina143059SoilWestern Australia, Australia2011MF326843KJ372262n.a.MF326814n.a.n.a.MF326869n.a.n.a.
P. cooljarloo143062SoilWestern Australia, Australia2008HQ012881HQ012957n.a.MF326816n.a.n.a.HQ012925n.a.n.a.
P. gemini46H1123382AZostera marinaThe Netherlands1999MH620038FJ217680KX251125KX251126KX251127KX251128KX251129KX251130KX251131
P. humicola32F8200.8152179, MYA-4080P3826TSoilTaiwan1976KF112862KF112855KX251139KX251140KX251141KX251142KX251143KX251144KX251145
P. inundata30J3390121TOlea sp.Spain1996KF112863KF112856KX251153KX251154KX251155KX251156KX251157KX251158KX251159
P. kwongonina143060SoilWestern Australia, Australia2010MF326847JN547636n.a.MF326824n.a.n.a.MF326876n.a.n.a.
P. pseudorosacearum143061SoilWestern Australia, Australia2013MF326858KJ372267n.a.MF326827n.a.n.a.MF326878n.a.n.a.
P. rosacearum47J1MYA-4456TMalus domesticaCalifornia, USAn.a.MH620039MH620124KX251445KX251446KX251447KX251448KX251449KX251450KX251451
P. sp. personiiP11555ANicotiana tabacumNorth Carolina, USAn.a.FJ801604EU080312EU080313EU080314EU080315EU080316EU080317EU080318
P. sp. personiiAMF326861
P. taxon walnut40A7AIrrigation waterVirginia, USA2006MH620040MH620125KX251452KX251453KX251454KX251455KX251456KX251457KX251458
6bP. amnicola61G6131652TStream waterWestern Australia, Australia2009MH620041MH620126KX251167KX251168KX251169KX251170KX251171KX251172KX251173
P. bilorbang61G8131653TSoilWestern Australia, Australia2010MH620042MH620127KX251181KX251182n.a.KX251183KX251184KX251185KX251186
P. borealis60B2132023MYA-4881TStream waterAlaska, USA2008MH620043MH620128KX251187KX251188KX251189KX251190KX251191KX251192KX251193
P. chlamydospora28765389736TPrunus sp.United Kingdom1971AF541890KF750602n.a.n.a.n.a.
P16851JF273125GU594846
SoilWestern Australia, Australia1995HQ012878HQ012922
P. crassamura66D1140357TSoilItaly2012MH620044KP863493KX251201KX251202KX251203KX251204KX251205KX251206KX251207
P. fluvialis55B6129424TStream waterWestern Australia, Australia2009MH620045MH620129KX251208KX251209KX251210KX251211KX251212KX251213KX251214
P. gibbosa62B8127951TSoilWestern Australia, Australia2009MH620046MH620130KX251222KX251223KX251224KX251225KX251226KX251227KX251228
P. gonapodyides34A8554.6760351P6872Reservoir watern.a.1967KC733448KF112854KX251236KX251237KX251238KX251239KX251240KX251241KX251242
P. gregata62B9127952TSoilWestern Australia, Australia2009MH620047MH620131KX251250KX251251KX251252KX251253KX251254KX251255KX251256
P. lacustris389725P10337TSalix matsudanaEngland, UK1972JF896561AF266793EU080530EU080531EU080532EU080533EU080534EU080535EU080536
P. litoralis55B9127953TSoilWestern Australia, Australia2008MH620048MH620132KX251278KX251279KX251280KX251281KX251282KX251283KX251284
P. megasperma62C7402.725881732035P3599TAlthaea roseaWashington DC. USA1931MH620049MH620133KX251285KX251286KX251287KX251288KX251289KX251290n.a.
P. mississippiae57J3MYA-4946TIrrigation waterMississippi, USA2012KF112860KF112852KX251305KX251306KX251307KX251308KX251309KX251310KX251311
P. ornamentata66D2140647TSoilItaly2012MH620050KP863496KX251319KX251320KX251321KX251322KX251323KX251324KX251325
P. pinifolia47H1122924P16100TPinus radiataChile2007JN935960MH620134KX251333KX251334KX251335KX251336KX251337KX251338KX251339
P. riparia60B1132024MYA-4882TStream waterOregon, USA2006MH620051MH620135KX251347KX251348KX251349KX251350KX251351KX251352KX251353
P. thermophila55C1127954TSoilWestern Australia, Australia2004MH620052MH620136KX251354KX251355KX251356KX251357KX251358KX251359KX251360
P. × stagnum43F3MYA-4926TIrrigation waterVirginia, USA2007KC631619n.a.KX251375KX251376KX251377KX251378KX251379KX251380KX251381
6P. asparagi62C4132095MYA-4826TAsparagus officinalisMichigan, USA2006MH620053MH620137KX251473KX251474KX251475KX251476KX251477KX251478KX251479
P. sp. sulawesiensisP6306ASyzygium aromaticumIndonesia1989HQ261458EF590257EU080345n.a.EU080346EU080347EU080348EU080349EU080350
7aP. attenuata67C5141199TCastanopsis carlesii rhizosphere soilTaiwan2013MH620054KU517154KX251609KX251610KX251611KX251612KX251613KX251614KX251615
P. europaea62A2109049TSoilFrance1998MH620055MH620138KX251522KX251523KX251524KX251525KX251526KX251527KX251528
P. flexuosa67C3TSoilTaiwan2013MH620056KU517152KX251616KX251617KX251618KX251619KX251620KX251621KX251622
P. formosa67C4TSoilTaiwan2013MH620057KU517153KX251623KX251624KX251625KX251626KX251627KX251628KX251629
P. fragariae61J3209.46181417P6231TFragaria × ananassaEngland, UKn.a.MH620058MH620139KX251543KX251544KX251545KX251546KX251547KX251548KX251549
P. intricata67B9TSoilTaiwan2013MH620059KU517155KX251630KX251631KX251632KX251633KX251634KX251635KX251636
P. rubi46C790442TRubus idaeus cv. Glen ClovaScotland, UKn.a.DQ674736HQ643340KX251564KX251565KX251566KX251567KX251568KX251569KX251570
P. uliginosa62A3109054P10413TSoilPoland1998MH620060MH620140EU080011EU080012EU080013KX251571KX251572EU080015KX251573
P. uniformisAlnus sp.Sweden1996KU681019AF139367n.a.KU899260n.a.n.a.KU899417n.a.n.a.
P. × alni47A7392314TAlnus sp.UK1994KU681017MH620141KX251588KX251589KX251590KX251591KX251592KX251593KX251594
P. × cambivora22F646719, MYA-4076Abies sp.Oregon, USAn.a.MH620061KT183037KX251494KX251495KX251496KX251497KX251498KX251499KX251500
P. × heterohybrida67C1141207TStream waterTaiwan2013KU517145KU517151KX251637KX251638KX251639KX251640KX251641KX251642KX251643
P. × incrassata67C2141209TStream waterTaiwan2013KU517150KU517156KX251644KX251645KX251646KX251647KX251648KX251649KX251650
P. × multiformis392316P16202Abies sp.The Netherlands1994KU681018AF139368n.a.KU899239n.a.n.a.KU899396n.a.n.a.
7bP. asiatica61H3133347TPueraria lobataJapan2005MH620062MH620142KX251665KX251666KX251667KX251668KX251669KX251670KX251671
P. cajani45F744388P3105TCajanus cajaniIndian.a.MH620063MH620143KX251686KX251687KX251688KX251689KX251690KX251691KX251692
P. melonis45F3582.6952854TCucumis sativusJapann.a.MH620064KT183041KX251707KX251708KX251709KX251710KX251711KX251712KX251713
P. niederhauserii31E7P10617AThuja occidentalisNorth Carolina, USA2001MH620065MH620144KX251728KX251729KX251730KX251731KX251732KX251733KX251734
P. pisi60A4TPeaSweden2009MH620066KT183042KX251735KX251736KX251737KX251738KX251739KX251740KX251741
P. pistaciae33D6MYA-4082386658TPistacia veraIran1986MH620067KT183043KX251748KX251749KX251750KX251751KX251752KX251753KX251754
P. sojae22D8312.6216705, MYA-3899131375Glycine maxOntario, Canada1959MH620068MH620145KX251762KX251763KX251764KX251765KX251766KX251767KX251768
P. vignae45G646735AGlycine maxn.a.n.a.MH620069MH620146KX251776KX251777KX251778KX251779KX251780KX251781KX251782
7cP. cinnamomi61J1144.224667122938P2110TCinnamomum burmanniiIndonesia1922MH620070MH620147KX251811KX251812KX251813KX251814KX251815KX251816KX251817
P. parvispora66C8132772TArbutus unedoItaly2011MH620071KC478667KX251839KX251840KX251841KX251842KX251843KX251844KX251845
P. sp. ax46H5AIlex glabra “Shamrock”Virginia, USA2008MH620072MH620148KX251846KX251847KX251848KX251849KX251850KX251851KX251852
7dP. fragariaefolia61H4135747TFragaria × ananassaJapan2005MH620073MH620149KX251853KX251854KX251855KX251856KX251857KX251858KX251859
P. nagaii61H5133248TRosa sp.Japan1968MH620074MH620150KX251860KX251861KX251862KX251863KX251864KX251865KX251866
8aP. cryptogea61H9113.19180615P1738TSolanum lycopersicumIrelandn.a.MH620075MH620151KX251867KX251868KX251869KX251870KX251871KX251872KX251873
P. drechsleri23J5292.3546724P1087TBeta vulgaris var. altissimaCalifornia, USAn.a.MH620076MH620152KX251888KX251889KX251890KX251891KX251892KX251893KX251894
P. erythroseptica61J2129.2334684P1693TSolanum tuberosumIrelandn.a.MH620077MH620153KX251895KX251896KX251897KX251898KX251899KX251900KX251901
P. medicaginis23A4MYA-3900Medicago sativaOhio, USAn.a.KF358236KF358223KX251902KX251903KX251904KX251905KX251906KX251907KX251908
P. pseudocryptogea139749TIsopogon buxifoliusWestern Australia, Australia2006KP288342KP288376n.a.
P. pseudocryptogea52402P3103Solanum marginatumEcuadorn.a.EU080626EU080627EU080628EU080629EU080630EU080631
P. richardiae45F5240.360353, 46734325930TZantedeschia aethiopicaUSAn.a.MH620078MH620154KX251923KX251924KX251925KX251926KX251927KX251928KX251929
P. sansomeana47H3MYA-4455TGlycine sp.Indiana, USAn.a.MH620079MH620155KX251930KX251931KX251932KX251933KX251934KX251935KX251936
P. trifolii62A9117687TTrifolium sp.Mississippi, USAn.a.MH620080MH620156KX251958KX251959KX251960KX251961KX251962KX251963KX251964
P. sp. kelmania24A7MYA-4162AAbies concolorWest Virginia, USA1998MH620081MH620157KX251986KX251987KX251988KX251989KX251990KX251991KX251992
8bP. brassicae61J8179.87P7517, P19521TBrassica oleraceaThe Netherlands1986MH620082MH620158KX252000KX252001KX252002KX252003KX252004KX252005KX252006
P. cichorii62A8115029TCichorium intybus var. foliosumThe Netherlands2004MH620083MH620159KX252007KX252008KX252009KX252010KX252011KX252012KX252013
P. dauci61E5127102TDaucus carotaFrance2009MH620084MH620160KX252014KX252015KX252016KX252017KX252018KX252019KX252020
P. lactucae61F4TLactuca sativaGreece2001MH620085MH620161KX252042KX252043KX252044KX252045KX252046KX252047KX252048
P. primulae29E9620.97Primula acaulisGermany1997KF358238KF358226KX252063KX252064KX252065KX252066KX252067KX252068KX252069
P. pseudolactucae137103Lactuca sativaJapan2013n.a.AB894388n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.
P. taxon castitis61E7131246AFragaria × ananassaSweden1995MH620086MH620162KX252098KX252099KX252100KX252101KX252102KX252103KX252104
P. taxon parsley61G1APetroselinum crispumGreece2006MH620087MH620163KX252105KX252106KX252107KX252108KX252109KX252110KX252111
8cP. foliorum49J8121655MYA-3638P10974TRhododendron sp.Tennessee, USA2004EU124918MH620164KX252112KX252113KX252114KX252115KX252116KX252117KX252118
P. hibernalis22H1270.316035236906P6871Citrus sinensisPortugal1931MH620088KT183039KX252119KX252120KX252121KX252122KX252123KX252124KX252125
P. lateralis22H9MYA-3898AChamaecyparis lawsonianaOregon, USAn.a.MH620089MH620165KX252133KX252134KX252135KX252136KX252137KX252138KX252139
P. ramorum32G2Camellia japonicaSouth Carolina, USAn.a.MH620090MH620166KX252147KX252148KX252149KX252150KX252151KX252152KX252153
8dP. austrocedrae41B6122911MYA-4074TAustrocedrus chilensisArgentina2005KF358233KF358220KX252168KX252169KX252170KX252171KX252172KX252173KX252174
P. obscura60E9129273TSoilGermany1994MH620091MH620167KX252175KX252176KX252177KX252178KX252179KX252180KX252181
P. syringae21H934002P0649Citrus sp.California, USAn.a.MH620092MH620168KX252196KX252197KX252198KX252199KX252200KX252201KX252202
8P. stricta58A1MYA-4944TIrrigation waterMississippi, USA2012KF192702KF192694KX252210KX252211KX252212KX252213KX252214KX252215KX252216
9a (cluster 9a1)P. aquimorbida40A6MYA-4578TIrrigation waterVirginia, USA2006GQ294536FJ666127KX252238KX252239KX252240KX252241KX252242KX252243KX252244
P. chrysanthemi61F1123163TChrysanthemum × morifoliumJapan2000MH620093KT183038KX252266KX252267KX252268KX252269KX252270KX252271KX252272
P. hydrogena46A3MYA-4919TIrrigation waterVirginia, USA2007KC249962KC249959KX252280KX252281KX252282KX252283KX252284KX252285KX252286
P. hydropathica05D1MYA-4460TIrrigation waterVirginia, USA2000KC733452EU583793KX252294KX252295KX252296KX252297KX252298KX252299KX252300
P. irrigata23J7MYA-4457TIrrigation waterVirginia, USA2000KC733453EU334634KX252315KX252316KX252317KX252318KX252319KX252320KX252321
P. macilentosa58A7MYA-4945TIrrigation waterMississippi, USA2012KF192708KF192700KX252343KX252344KX252345KX252346KX252347KX252348KX252349
P. parsiana47C3395329TFicus caricaIran1991KC733455KC733446KX252357KX252358KX252359KX252360KX252361KX252362KX252363
P. virginiana46A2MYA-4927TIrrigation waterVirginia, USA2007KC295546KC295544KX252378KX252379KX252380KX252381KX252382KX252383KX252384
P. aff. parsiana G147C8APistacia veraIrann.a.MH620094MH620169KX252397KX252398KX252399KX252400KX252401KX252402
P. aff. parsiana G1395328P8618Pistacia veraIran1992EU080201
P. aff. parsiana G247C5395330APistacia veraIran1992MH620095MH620170KX252433KX252434KX252435KX252436KX252437KX252438n.a.
P. aff. parsiana G347D8APistacia veraIrann.a.MH620096n.a.KX252463KX252464KX252465KX252466KX252467KX252468n.a.
P. sp. cuyabensisP8213An.a.Ecuador1993n.a.FJ802118EU080664EU080665EU080666EU080667EU080668EU080669EU080331
P. sp. lagoariana60B5P8217Tn.a.Ecuadorn.a.MH620097MH620171KX252503KX252504KX252505KX252506KX252507KX252508KX252509
9a (cluster 9a2)P. macrochlamydospora-G133E1P10264Glycine maxNew South Wales, Australian.a.KC733454KC733445KX252510KX252511KX252512KX252513KX252514KX252515
P. macrochlamydospora-G1P10267Glycine maxNew South Wales, Australia1994EU080007
P. macrochlamydospora-G233D5240.360353340618Zantedeschia aethiopicaThe Netherlands1927MH620098MH620172KX252516KX252517KX252518n.a.KX252519KX252520KX252521
P. quininea46C4407.4846733TCinchona officinalisPerun.a.MH620099MH620173EU079802EU079803EU079804KX252524EU079805EU079806EU079807
9a (cluster 9a3)P. insolita38E1691.7938789288805TSoilTaiwan1980AY564188GU111612EU080175EU080176EU080177EU080178EU080179EU080180EU080181
P. polonica49J9P15005ASoilPoland2006KC733456KF358225EU080256KX252546EU080258EU080259EU080260EU080261EU080262
P. pseudopolonica142610n.a.KY707115n.a.KY707104KY787198n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.
9bP. captiosa46H7P10719TEucalyptus salignaNew Zealand1992KC733449MH620174EU079658EU079659EU079660EU079661EU079662EU079663EU079664
P. constricta55C3125801TSoilWestern Australia, Australia2006KC733450MH620175KX252561KX252562KX252563KX252564KX252565KX252566KX252567
P. fallax46J2P10722TEucalyptus delegatensisNew Zealand1997KC733451MH620176KX252568KX252569KX252570KX252571KX252572KX252573KX252574
10P. boehmeriae45F9291.29180614P6950TBoehmeriae niveaTaiwan1927KT183047KT183036EU080161EU080162EU080163EU080164EU080165EU080166EU080167
P. gallica50A1111474P16826TQuercus roburFrance1998KF317112KF317090KX252589KX252590KX252591KX252592KX252593KX252594KX252595
P. gondwanensis22G7MYA-3893n.a.Ohio, USAn.a.KT183046KT183035KX252603KX252604KX252605KX252606KX252607KX252608KX252609
P. intercalaris45B7140632TSD-7TStream waterVirginia, USA2007KT163315KT163268KX252610KX252611KX252612KX252613KX252614KX252615KX252616
P. kernoviae46C8P10956Rhododendron ponticumEngland, UK2004KT183048MH620177EU080041EU080042EU080043EU080044EU080045EU080046KX252631
P. morindae62B5121982TMorinda citrifolia var. citrifoliaHawaii, USA2005KT183050MH620178KX252633KX252634KX252635KX252636KX252637KX252638KX252639
P. sp. boehmeriae-like45F8357.526017332199P1378ACitrus sinensisArgentina1939KF317111KF317089KX252640KX252641KX252642KX252643KX252644KX252645KX252646
n.a.P. lilii135746TLilium sp.Japan1987AB856786MG865523AB856779AB856782AB856788AB856791AB856794AB856797AB856800
OutgroupElongisporangium undulatum101728337230P10342TLarix sp.Scotland, UK1989FJ802126EU080441EU080445
Pythium aphanidermatumAY564163

Molecular phylogenetic (sub)clade as indicated by the concatenated-sequence tree (TreeBASE S22998).

Isolate identification: CH, Chuanxue Hong laboratory at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia Beach, VA, USA; CBS, Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands; ATCC, American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA; IMI, CABI Biosciences, UK; WPC, the World Phytophthora Genetic Resource Collection at University of California, Riverside, USA.

Ex-types (T) or authentic (A) isolates (designated as representative isolates by the originators of the respective species).

Marker: cox1, cytochrome-c oxidase 1 gene; ITS, internal transcribed spacer region; 60S, 60S Ribosomal protein L10; β-tub, beta-tubulin; EF-1α, elongation factor 1 alpha; ENL, enolase; Hsp90, heat shock protein 90; 28S, 28S ribosomal DNA; tigA, tigA gene fusion protein.

n.a., not available.

Information and GenBank accession numbers of isolates used in this study. Molecular phylogenetic (sub)clade as indicated by the concatenated-sequence tree (TreeBASE S22998). Isolate identification: CH, Chuanxue Hong laboratory at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia Beach, VA, USA; CBS, Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands; ATCC, American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA; IMI, CABI Biosciences, UK; WPC, the World Phytophthora Genetic Resource Collection at University of California, Riverside, USA. Ex-types (T) or authentic (A) isolates (designated as representative isolates by the originators of the respective species). Marker: cox1, cytochrome-c oxidase 1 gene; ITS, internal transcribed spacer region; 60S, 60S Ribosomal protein L10; β-tub, beta-tubulin; EF-1α, elongation factor 1 alpha; ENL, enolase; Hsp90, heat shock protein 90; 28S, 28S ribosomal DNA; tigA, tigA gene fusion protein. n.a., not available.

DNA extraction, amplification, and sequencing

To extract genomic DNA (gDNA), a 5 × 5 mm agar plug was cut from the actively growing edge of a fresh culture and transferred to 20% clarified V8 broth. Cultures were incubated at room temperature (c. 23°C) for 7–14 d to produce a mycelial mass. The mass was blotted dry on sterile tissue paper, transferred to a garnet bead tube and lysed in a FastPrep®-24 (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA). gDNA was purified using a custom Maxwell® 16 FFS nucleic acid extraction kit in combination with a Maxwell® Rapid Sample Concentrator (Promega, Madison, WI). A pair of primers including the forward primer ITS6 and reverse primer ITS4 (Cooke et al., 2000) was used to amplify the ITS region. The cox1 fragment was amplified with the primer pair COXF4N and COXR4N (Kroon et al., 2004). PCR reaction mixtures were prepared with Takara Taq DNA polymerase (Takara Shuzo, Shiga, Japan) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Each cox1 PCR reaction mixture contained an additional 2-μL 25 mM MgCl2 and 0.25-μL Bovine serum albumin (BSA) per 25-μL. Thermal cycling protocols were described previously (Cooke et al., 2000; Kroon et al., 2004). All PCR products were evaluated for successful amplification using agarose gel electrophoresis. Sequencing reactions were run in both directions with the same primer pairs used for amplification at the University of Kentucky Advanced Genetic Technologies Center (Lexington, KY) or Eton Bioscience Inc. (Durham, NC). Results were viewed in Finch TV version 1.4.0 (Geospiza, Seattle, WA), aligned using Clustal X (Larkin et al., 2007), and edited manually to correct obvious sequencing errors and code ambiguous sites according to the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) nucleotide ambiguity codes to produce a consensus sequence. All sequences produced in this study have been deposited in GenBank (Table 1). Rates of PCR success for all nine genetic markers were estimated by calculating the percentage of successful amplifications over all PCR reactions performed by the authors for each marker during the past 6 years.

Genus-wide distance analyses

All nine genetic markers were analyzed for overall species distances resolved across the genus Phytophthora. Sequence datasets of each marker were aligned using the MUSCLE version 3.7 (Edgar, 2004) in MEGA version 7.0.26 (Kumar et al., 2016). Alignments were manually modified when obvious errors were present. The alignment of each marker was then trimmed to an equal size and question marks were inserted to represent missing data at both ends of short sequences. DNA sequence distances were calculated using the Kimura 2-parameter (K2P) distance model (Kimura, 1980) to explore the maximum, minimum and mean distances across the genus.

Distance analyses within individual (sub)clades

Four selected markers that had relatively high mean species distances across the genus (cox1, ITS, tigA, and β-tub) were analyzed for distances within individual (sub)clades. Phylogenetic (sub)clade assignments for each species were identified according to the recent study by Yang et al. (2017). Sequence datasets within individual (sub)clades of each marker were aligned and edited as described above. Maximum, minimum, and mean distances within individual (sub)clades of each marker were calculated as described above.

Comparison of individual-marker trees with concatenated-sequence tree

Each marker tree for all four selected markers (cox1, ITS, tigA, and β-tub) included a set of identical 150 Phytophthora taxa, plus two outgroup taxa: Elongisporangium undulatum (basionym: Pythium undulatum) was used as the outgroup taxon for ITS, tigA, and β-tub, while Pythium aphanidermatum (Uzuhashi et al., 2010) was used for the mitochondrial marker cox1. The sequence dataset of each marker was aligned in MEGA 7 and edited as described above. Then, the four alignments were combined in MEGA 7 to produce a concatenated sequence alignment. Phylogeny reconstructions including four individual-marker trees and a concatenated-sequence tree were carried out using both Maximum likelihood (ML) and Neighbor joining (NJ) methods with the K2P model and 1000 bootstrap replications in MEGA 7. Alignments and phylogenetic trees have been deposited in TreeBASE (S22998). To validate the accuracy of the concatenated-sequence trees, the clade affiliation of individual species was compared with those presented in previous phylogenetic studies. The overall topological scores between the concatenated-sequence trees and individual-marker trees were calculated using Compare2Trees version September 2011 (Nye et al., 2006).

Results

PCR consistency, amplifications, and sequence alignments

The ITS region was the easiest genetic marker to amplify (Table 2). The rates of PCR amplification success for β-tub, 28S, 60S, Hsp90, and EF-1α were also high (>90%; Table 2). Markers tigA, ENL, and cox1 (using primer pair COXF4N and COXR4N) had relatively low success rates (≤ 80%) with the tigA being the most difficult (Table 2).
Table 2

PCR consistency and overall species distance across the genus Phytophthora by genetic marker.

MarkeraInternal primers usedbAligned length (bases)No. of amplificationsNo. of speciesdRate of PCR success (%)cMean distanceeDistance range
cox1No867456165750.092 ± 0.00030–0.256
ITSNo1,039408169990.082 ± 0.00030–0.182
tigAYes1,670284155710.058 ± 0.00010–0.110
β-tubNo1,136502169960.043 ± 0.00010–0.087
ENLNo1,168345159800.035 ± 0.00010–0.097
28SNo1,273323160970.035 ± 0.00020–0.088
60SNo496344160970.030 ± 0.00010–0.085
Hsp90Yes1,758330168950.024 ± 0.00010–0.116
EF-1αNo1,015299159980.008 ± 0.00000–0.024

Marker: cox1, cytochrome-c oxidase 1 gene; ITS, internal transcribed spacer region; 60S, 60S Ribosomal protein L10; β-tub, beta-tubulin; EF-1α, elongation factor 1 alpha; ENL, enolase; Hsp90, heat shock protein 90; 28S, 28S ribosomal DNA; tigA, tigA gene fusion protein.

Internal primers for sequencing tigA and Hsp90 are listed in Blair et al. (.

Rate of successful PCR amplification for each marker done by the authors during the past 6 years.

Number of species (one isolate per species) included in the sequence alignment of each marker.

Overall species distance (mean ± standard error) calculated using the Kimura 2-parameter (K2P) distance model in MEGA 7.

PCR consistency and overall species distance across the genus Phytophthora by genetic marker. Marker: cox1, cytochrome-c oxidase 1 gene; ITS, internal transcribed spacer region; 60S, 60S Ribosomal protein L10; β-tub, beta-tubulin; EF-1α, elongation factor 1 alpha; ENL, enolase; Hsp90, heat shock protein 90; 28S, 28S ribosomal DNA; tigA, tigA gene fusion protein. Internal primers for sequencing tigA and Hsp90 are listed in Blair et al. (. Rate of successful PCR amplification for each marker done by the authors during the past 6 years. Number of species (one isolate per species) included in the sequence alignment of each marker. Overall species distance (mean ± standard error) calculated using the Kimura 2-parameter (K2P) distance model in MEGA 7. Sequences could not be obtained from 11 taxa for 60S, 2 for β-tub, 12 for EF-1α, 12 for ENL, 3 for Hsp90, 11 for 28S, 16 for tigA, 2 for ITS, and 6 for cox1 (Table 2). These taxa were excluded from distance analyses of individual markers. Eleven taxa missing any of cox1, ITS, tigA, or β-tub sequences were also excluded in the comparison of individual-marker trees with concatenated-sequence tree. Sequence lengths were consistent for all markers except for the ITS, in spite of missing data at either or both ends of short sequences. Length of ITS sequences varied from 744 bases (P. hydrogena in cluster 9a1 of subclade 9a) to 848 bases (P. intercalaris in clade 10). Among the nine markers, the aligned length was the shortest for 60S and longest for Hsp90 (Table 2). The aligned length of concatenated sequences (cox1, ITS, tigA, and β-tub) of 150 Phytophthora taxa plus the outgroup was 4,714 bases. The mean species distance of cox1 was the highest among the nine markers (Table 2). ITS had the highest genus-wide resolution among the nuclear markers, followed by tigA and β-tub (Table 2). ENL, 28S, 60S, Hsp90, and EF-1α had lower species distances (mean distance < 0.04). EF-1α had the lowest resolution across the genus (Table 2). Species pairs with identical sequences (distance = 0) were found for all markers.

Distances within individual (sub)clades

Four markers including cox1, ITS, tigA, and β-tub, were selected for distance analyses within individual (sub)clades. Species distances (mean values and ranges) for 10 Phytophthora clades and 20 subclades according to previously assigned numbers (Yang et al., 2017) are listed in Table 3.
Table 3

Species distance of the four most informative genetic markers with recommendations for identifying isolates in each Phytophthora (sub)clade.

CladeMarkerRecommended markers for unambiguous ID
cox1ITStigAβ-tub
11a0.008–0.026 (0.018mean ± 0.002se)0.004–0.009 (0.006mean ± 0.001se)0.008–0.024 (0.018mean ± 0.003se)0.003–0.004 (0.004mean ± 0.0003se)All
1b0.003–0.073 (0.049mean ± 0.023se)0.014–0.027 (0.022mean ± 0.004se)0.013–0.061 (0.041mean ± 0.014se)0.028–0.035 (0.031mean ± 0.002se)All
1c0.008–0.019 (0.013mean ± 0.001se)0–0.003 (0.001mean ± 0.0003se)0–0.009 (0.005mean ± 0.001se)0.002–0.007 (0.004mean ± 0.001se)cox1 and β-tub
Overall0–0.075 (0.047mean ±0.003se)0–0.070 (0.047mean ±0.003se)0–0.108 (0.072mean ±0.004se)0.002–0.077 (0.046mean ±0.003se)β-tub
22a0.003–0.082 (0.040mean ± 0.006se)0.001–0.010 (0.005mean ± 0.001se)0.001–0.028 (0.017mean ± 0.002se)0–0.026 (0.012mean ± 0.002se)cox1
2b0.004–0.039 (0.024mean ± 0.003se)0.004–0.019 (0.012mean ± 0.001se)0.006–0.044 (0.034mean ± 0.003se)0–0.037 (0.021mean ± 0.002se)cox1, ITS, and tigA
2c0.011–0.051 (0.027mean ± 0.002se)0.003–0.022 (0.009mean ± 0.001se)0.004–0.046 (0.024mean ± 0.003se)0.001–0.027 (0.012mean ± 0.001se)cox1, ITS, and tigA
2d0.029–0.038 (0.035mean ± 0.003se)0.028–0.056 (0.041mean ± 0.008se)0.066–0.095 (0.082mean ± 0.008se)0.023–0.043 (0.035mean ± 0.006se)All
2e0.0270.0180.0230.012All
Overall0.003–0.089 (0.045mean ±0.001se)0–0.085 (0.032mean ±0.001se)0.001–0.135 (0.073mean ±0.002se)0–0.081 (0.043mean ±0.001se)cox1
30.027–0.058 (0.046mean ±0.004se)0.001–0.010 (0.006mean ±0.001se)0.012–0.022 (0.016mean ±0.001se)0.004–0.014 (0.009mean ±0.001se)cox1, tigA, and β-tub
40.004–0.064 (0.036mean ±0.004se)0.001–0.111 (0.061mean ±0.007se)0.005–0.135 (0.095mean ±0.009se)0.002–0.076 (0.047mean ±0.005se)cox1, tigA, and β-tub
50.008–0.037 (0.023mean ±0.006se)0–0.012 (0.006mean ±0.002se)0.003–0.011 (0.007mean ±0.001se)0.002–0.006 (0.004mean ±0.001se)cox1, tigA, and β-tub
66a0.010–0.056 (0.036mean ± 0.002se)0.001–0.066 (0.029mean ± 0.002se)0.004–0.086 (0.055mean ± 0.005se)0–0.052 (0.031mean ± 0.002se)cox1 and tigA
6b0.015–0.077 (0.053mean ± 0.001se)0–0.040 (0.021mean ± 0.001se)0.015–0.039 (0.025mean ± 0.0004se)0.001–0.031 (0.018mean ± 0.001se)cox1 and tigA
Overall0.010–0.116 (0.064mean ±0.001se)0–0.098 (0.036mean ±0.001se)0.003–0.111 (0.042mean ±0.001se)0–0.054 (0.025mean ±0.001se)cox1and tigA
77a0–0.042 (0.021mean ± 0.001se)0–0.012 (0.005mean ± 0.0003se)0.005–0.029 (0.014mean ± 0.001se)0–0.014 (0.007mean ± 0.0003se)tigA
7b0.003–0.050 (0.037mean ± 0.002se)0.004–0.029 (0.015mean ± 0.001se)0.008–0.032 (0.019mean ± 0.001se)0.005–0.023 (0.015mean ± 0.001se)All
7c0.058–0.060 (0.059mean ± 0.001se)0.016–0.022 (0.020mean ± 0.002se)0.024–0.029 (0.027mean ± 0.001se)0.020–0.024 (0.022mean ± 0.001se)All
7d0.0180.0040.0040.003All
Overall0–0.085 (0.050mean ±0.001se)0–0.112 (0.040mean ±0.002se)0.004–0.062 (0.032mean ±0.001se)0–0.041 (0.023mean ±0.001se)tigA
88a0–0.067 (0.041mean ± 0.003se)0–0.038 (0.018mean ± 0.002se)0.001–0.033 (0.019mean ± 0.002se)0–0.033 (0.019mean ± 0.001se)tigAa
8b0.007–0.065 (0.055mean ± 0.003se)0–0.028 (0.017mean ± 0.002se)0.003–0.073 (0.052mean ± 0.003se)0–0.060 (0.040mean ± 0.004se)cox1 and tigA
8c0.046–0.070 (0.061mean ± 0.004se)0.014–0.074 (0.044mean ± 0.008se)0.040–0.072 (0.054mean ± 0.005se)0.023–0.047 (0.035mean ± 0.004se)All
8d0.034–0.040 (0.038mean ± 0.002se)0.027–0.040 (0.034mean ± 0.004se)0.047–0.063 (0.057mean ± 0.005se)0.028–0.038 (0.033mean ± 0.003se)All
Overall0–0.104 (0.070mean ±0.001se)0–0.136 (0.069mean ±0.002se)0.001–0.133 (0.079mean ±0.002se)0–0.113 (0.057mean ±0.001se)tigAa
99a10.001–0.091 (0.034mean ± 0.003se)0.005–0.090 (0.047mean ± 0.003se)0–0.067 (0.031mean ± 0.002se)0–0.052 (0.019mean ± 0.002se)ITS
9a20.003–0.013 (0.009mean ± 0.003se)0.001–0.013 (0.009mean ± 0.004se)0.002–0.004 (0.003mean ± 0.001se)0–0.001 (0.001mean ± 0.0003se)cox1 and tigA
9a30.0510.006–0.073 (0.050mean ± 0.022se)0.0380.001–0.021 (0.014mean ± 0.006se)cox1, ITS, and tigA
9b0.046–0.074 (0.063mean ± 0.008se)0.010–0.068 (0.048mean ± 0.019se)0.016–0.064 (0.048mean ± 0.016se)0.019–0.043 (0.032mean ± 0.007se)All
Overall0.001–0.112 (0.057mean ±0.002se)0.001–0.188 (0.110mean ±0.004se)0–0.075 (0.046mean ±0.001se)0–0.065 (0.034mean ±0.001se)ITS and cox1a
100.032–0.088 (0.064mean ±0.003se)0.014–0.142 (0.096mean ±0.010se)0.037–0.111 (0.087mean ±0.005se)0.020–0.077 (0.056mean ±0.004se)All

(Sub)clades containing species with identical sequences are highlighted in orange. (Sub)clades containing almost identical sequences (distance ≤ 0.001) are highlighted in yellow. Overall species distance and recommended marker(s) for each clade are in bold.

Taxa with almost identical sequences (distance ≤ 0.001) for the respective markers were found.

Species distance of the four most informative genetic markers with recommendations for identifying isolates in each Phytophthora (sub)clade. (Sub)clades containing species with identical sequences are highlighted in orange. (Sub)clades containing almost identical sequences (distance ≤ 0.001) are highlighted in yellow. Overall species distance and recommended marker(s) for each clade are in bold. Taxa with almost identical sequences (distance ≤ 0.001) for the respective markers were found. Among the four markers, tigA and cox1 had relatively high distances within most (sub)clades. Species with identical sequences were found in 3 clades and 2 subclades for cox1, 2 clades and 2 subclades for tigA, 5 clades, and 8 subclades for β-tub, and 6 clades and 5 subclades for ITS (Table 3). Species pairs with identical sequences of each marker in individual (sub)clades are listed in Table 4.
Table 4

Species pairs with identical sequences for four genetic markers.

(Sub)cladeSpp. pairsITStigAβ-tubcox1
1cP. andinaP. infestansxx
P. andinaP. mirabilisx
P. infestansP. mirabilisx
1P. iranicaP. infestansx
2aP. occultansP. terminalisx
2bP. capsiciP. mexicanax
5P. agathidicidaP. castaneaex
6aP. kwongoninaP. rosacearumx
6bP. chlamydosporaP. gonapodyidesx
7aP. alniP. × incrassatax
P. alniP. × multiformisxxx
P. europaeaP. flexuosax
P. fragariaeP. rubix
P. uniformisP. alnix
P. uniformisP. × incrassatax
P. uniformisP. × multiformisx
P. × incrassataP. × multiformisx
8aP. cryptogeaP. erythrosepticaxxx
8bP. lactucaeP. pseudolactucaex
P. primulaeP. taxon parsleyxx
9a1P. hydropathicaP. parsianax
P. hydropathicaP. virginianax
P. hydropathicaP. aff. parsiana G1xx
P. hydropathicaP. aff. parsiana G2x
P. hydropathicaP. aff. parsiana G3x
P. parsianaP. virginianax
P. parsianaP. aff. parsiana G1x
P. parsianaP. aff. parsiana G2x
P. parsianaP. aff. parsiana G3x
P. virginianaP. aff. parsiana G1x
P. virginianaP. aff. parsiana G2x
P. virginianaP. aff. parsiana G3x
P. aff. parsiana G1P. aff. parsiana G2x
P. aff. parsiana G1P. aff. parsiana G3x
P. aff. parsiana G2P. aff. parsiana G3x
9a2P. macrochlamydospora-G2P. quinineax
Species pairs with identical sequences for four genetic markers. For clade 1, there were no identical β-tub sequences, while identical species pairs were found for the other three markers (Table 3). No identical sequences of cox1 or tigA were found in clades 2 and 6. All markers except for the ITS had acceptable to high (minimum distance = 0.002–0.027) resolution within clade 3, 4, and 5. Identical ITS sequences were found in clade 5. Almost identical ITS sequences (distance ≤ 0.001) were found in clades 3 and 4. tigA was the only marker of unambiguity for clade 8, although almost identical tigA sequences were present in that clade (Table 3). No identical sequences of cox1 or ITS were found in clade 9. All markers provided high resolution among clade-10 species. The resulted clade assignments and clade affiliation of individual species (Table 1) based on the concatenated-sequence tree (TreeBASE S22998) were nearly identical to those generated in previous phylogenetic studies (Blair et al., 2008; Martin et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2017) except that the placement of P. quercina was ambiguous. All trees from sequences of the three nuclear markers had similar topologies (score = 75.3–81.7%) to those of the concatenated-sequences trees in both ML and NJ analyses. In contrast, cox1 sequences produced trees of distinct topologies (TreeBASE S22998). The overall topological similarities to the concatenated-sequences trees were approximately 45% lower than those of nuclear markers in both analyses (Table 5).
Table 5

Similarity of individual-marker trees to concatenated-sequence tree.

MarkerOverall topological scorea
Maximum likelihoodNeighbor joining
cox136.637.1
ITS81.077.9
tigA78.481.7
β-tub75.379.2

Scores were calculated using Compare2Trees.

Similarity of individual-marker trees to concatenated-sequence tree. Scores were calculated using Compare2Trees.

Discussion

This study identified four most informative genetic markers for identifying Phytophthora species: cox1, ITS, tigA, and β-tub. The resolution of each marker depended on (sub)clade. These results along with the signature sequences generated by Cooke et al. (2000), Kroon et al. (2004), Blair et al. (2008), Martin et al. (2014), and Yang et al. (2017) enable first responders, diagnosticians, and researchers to identify Phytophthora isolates with confidence at minimal cost in the briefest time possible.

ITS

Using the ITS sequence to identify Phytophthora isolates has several advantages. First, the ITS region has the most comprehensive sequence database when compared to other markers. As this marker has been proposed as the barcode for fungi and oomycetes (Seifert, 2009) and later designated as the barcode for all fungi (Schoch et al., 2012), almost all known Phytophthora taxa have been sequenced for the ITS region. Subsequently, sequencing the ITS region of unknown Phytophthora isolates has become a common practice in research labs and plant disease clinics. Second, the ITS region amplified by the primer pair ITS6/ITS4 has the best universality across the genus and the highest PCR consistency among markers evaluated in this study (Table 1). Third, the clade affiliations of individual species based on the ITS sequences mostly accord with those based on multilocus sequence data (Table 5). Despite the above merits, ITS alone is not sufficient to identify all Phytophthora isolates to the species level. Identical ITS sequences have been observed in 16 pairs of species in clades 1, and 5–8, more than any of tigA, β-tub, and cox1 (Table 4). These identical and other almost identical ITS sequences (distance ≤ 0.001 or difference between sequences ≤ 10 bases) were found in clades 1–9, while those for tigA, β-tub, and cox1 only occurred in 4, 5, and 4 clades, respectively (Table 3). This result indicates that it is important to use additional markers to identify Phytophthora isolates in all clades, perhaps with the exception of clade 10. Due to its high universality, availability, and PCR consistency, the ITS region is an ideal first genetic marker for identifying Phytophthora isolates to clade.

cox1 amplified by the primer pair COXF4N/COXR4N

The cox1 has the highest genus-wide resolution among the evaluated markers (Table 2). Only three species pairs with identical cox1 sequences were found (Table 4). However, using cox1 alone for identifying Phytophthora isolates presents a few problems. First, cox1 had the second lowest PCR success rate (Table 2). In cases, adjusting MgCl2 and BSA concentrations, and annealing temperature were required for a successful amplification. However, it is important to note that the presented PCR success rates (Table 2) were calculated based on all PCR amplifications done by the two authors in the past 6 years, while many other factors could influence the PCR success rate, such as the quality of DNA templates and primers, and different PCR operators and thermocyclers. Second, (sub)clade-classification solely by cox1 may conflict with those assigned by multi-locus analyses (Table 5). Thus, using cox1 alone may lead to misidentification of unknown Phytophthora isolates at the (sub)clade-level. Third, due to the uniparental inheritance of mitochondria, it is impossible to separate a hybrid Phytophthora species from its maternal parent based on the cox1 sequence. This is increasingly important as Phytophthora hybrids have been commonly found in many ecosystems (Nirenberg et al., 2009; Man in't Veld et al., 2012; Nagel et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2014; Husson et al., 2015; Jung et al., 2017). This problem not only occurs for cox1, but also for other mitochondrial markers that were not evaluated in this study.

tigA

The tigA has moderately high genus-wide resolution (Table 1). High similarity in topology between the tigA tree and the multi-locus tree (Table 5) makes this marker useful in assigning Phytophthora isolates to (sub)clades. Additionally, it had excellent resolution within most individual (sub)clades. Species with identical tigA sequences were found only in subclades 1c and 9a1 (Table 3). However, this marker has the lowest PCR success rate of 71%. In addition, internal primers were usually required for sequencing (Table 1), which increases the cost. Both factors potentially compromise the usefulness of the tigA marker.

β-tub

The marker β-tub had the fourth highest genus-wide resolution. High similarity in topology between the β-tub tree and the multi-locus tree (Table 5) makes this marker also useful for assigning Phytophthora taxa to (sub)clades. Like ITS, β-tub is easy to amplify (Table 2), which further adds to its usefulness. However, 22 species pairs in clades 2, and 6–9 have identical β-tub sequences (Table 3). Thus, β-tub does not have the resolution required for identifying Phytophthora isolates to species in these clades.

Conclusions

Among the nine genetic markers evaluated in this study, cox1, ITS, tigA, and β-tub were the most informative for the genus Phytophthora. Both ITS and β-tub were easy to amplify but had limited species distance within some (sub)clades. Comparatively, cox1 and tigA had high resolution within most (sub)clades but they were relatively difficult to amplify. In addition, cox1 was not useful for assigning species to (sub)clades nor for identifying hybrid taxa. Taken together, a two-step approach is recommended: identifying unknown Phytophthora isolates to clade level with ITS sequences then to species level with one or more additional markers (Table 3). For example, β-tub can be used to readily identify all species in clade 1, cox1 for clade 2, and tigA for clades 7 and 8 (Table 3).These recommendations along with available signature sequences enable first responders, diagnosticians, and researchers to identify Phytophthora isolates with confidence at reduced time and cost.

Author contributions

XY and CH conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools, and wrote the paper. XY performed the experiments and analyzed the data.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  24 in total

1.  A molecular phylogeny of Phytophthora and related oomycetes.

Authors:  D E Cooke; A Drenth; J M Duncan; G Wagels; C M Brasier
Journal:  Fungal Genet Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.495

2.  Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi.

Authors:  Conrad L Schoch; Keith A Seifert; Sabine Huhndorf; Vincent Robert; John L Spouge; C André Levesque; Wen Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Phylogenetic relationships among Phytophthora species inferred from sequence analysis of mitochondrially encoded cytochrome oxidase I and II genes.

Authors:  Frank N Martin; Paul W Tooley
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.696

4.  A novel algorithm and web-based tool for comparing two alternative phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  Tom M W Nye; Pietro Liò; Walter R Gilks
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-10-18       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Phytophthora database 2.0: update and future direction.

Authors:  Bongsoo Park; Frank Martin; David M Geiser; Hye-Seon Kim; Michele A Mansfield; Ekaterina Nikolaeva; Sook-Young Park; Michael D Coffey; Joseph Russo; Seong H Kim; Yilmaz Balci; Gloria Abad; Treena Burgess; Niklaus J Grünwald; Kyeongchae Cheong; Jaeyoung Choi; Yong-Hwan Lee; Seogchan Kang
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.025

6.  Phytophthora xserendipita sp. nov. and P. xpelgrandis, two destructive pathogens generated by natural hybridization.

Authors:  Willem A Man In 't Veld; Karin C H M Rosendahl; Chuanxue Hong
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 7.  Phytophthora ramorum: integrative research and management of an emerging pathogen in California and Oregon forests.

Authors:  David M Rizzo; Matteo Garbelotto; Everett M Hansen
Journal:  Annu Rev Phytopathol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 13.078

8.  Characterization of Phytophthora hybrids from ITS clade 6 associated with riparian ecosystems in South Africa and Australia.

Authors:  Jan H Nagel; Marieka Gryzenhout; Bernard Slippers; Michael J Wingfield; Giles E St J Hardy; Michael J C Stukely; Treena I Burgess
Journal:  Fungal Biol       Date:  2013-03-29

9.  Six new Phytophthora species from ITS Clade 7a including two sexually functional heterothallic hybrid species detected in natural ecosystems in Taiwan.

Authors:  T Jung; M H Jung; B Scanu; D Seress; G M Kovács; C Maia; A Pérez-Sierra; T-T Chang; A Chandelier; K Heungens; K van Poucke; P Abad-Campos; M Léon; S O Cacciola; J Bakonyi
Journal:  Persoonia       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 11.051

10.  MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  8 in total

1.  Genera of phytopathogenic fungi: GOPHY 4.

Authors:  Q Chen; M Bakhshi; Y Balci; K D Broders; R Cheewangkoon; S F Chen; X L Fan; D Gramaje; F Halleen; M Horta Jung; N Jiang; T Jung; T Májek; S Marincowitz; I Milenković; L Mostert; C Nakashima; I Nurul Faziha; M Pan; M Raza; B Scanu; C F J Spies; L Suhaizan; H Suzuki; C M Tian; M Tomšovský; J R Úrbez-Torres; W Wang; B D Wingfield; M J Wingfield; Q Yang; X Yang; R Zare; P Zhao; J Z Groenewald; L Cai; P W Crous
Journal:  Stud Mycol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 25.731

2.  Sympatric occurrence of sibling Phytophthora species associated with foot rot disease of black pepper in India.

Authors:  R Suseela Bhai; A Jeevalatha; C N Biju; K B Vinitha; Jose Cissin; O B Rosana; A Fayad; R Praveena; M Anandaraj; Santhosh J Eapen
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.214

3.  Comparative Genomic and Proteomic Analyses of Three Widespread Phytophthora Species: Phytophthora chlamydospora, Phytophthora gonapodyides and Phytophthora pseudosyringae.

Authors:  Jamie McGowan; Richard O'Hanlon; Rebecca A Owens; David A Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-04-30

Review 4.  Fantastic Downy Mildew Pathogens and How to Find Them: Advances in Detection and Diagnostics.

Authors:  Andres F Salcedo; Savithri Purayannur; Jeffrey R Standish; Timothy Miles; Lindsey Thiessen; Lina M Quesada-Ocampo
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-25

5.  Peptide-Based Identification of Phytophthora Isolates and Phytophthora Detection in Planta.

Authors:  Miroslav Berka; Marie Greplová; Iñigo Saiz-Fernández; Jan Novák; Markéta Luklová; Pavla Zelená; Michal Tomšovský; Břetislav Brzobohatý; Martin Černý
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  DNA Metabarcoding Reveals Broad Presence of Plant Pathogenic Oomycetes in Soil From Internationally Traded Plants.

Authors:  Simeon Rossmann; Erik Lysøe; Monica Skogen; Venche Talgø; May Bente Brurberg
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Phytophthora theobromicola sp. nov.: A New Species Causing Black Pod Disease on Cacao in Brazil.

Authors:  Jennifer Decloquement; Roberto Ramos-Sobrinho; Samuel Galvão Elias; Dahyana Santos Britto; Alina Sandra Puig; Ailton Reis; Rildo Alexandre Fernandes da Silva; Jaime Honorato-Júnior; Edna Dora Martins Newman Luz; Danilo Batista Pinho; Jean-Philippe Marelli
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Rapid detection of Phytophthora cinnamomi based on a new target gene Pcinn13739.

Authors:  Zhenpeng Chen; Binbin Jiao; Jing Zhou; Haibin He; Tingting Dai
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 6.073

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.