Literature DB >> 30337565

A Real-Time PCR based assay for determining parasite to host ratio and parasitaemia in the clinical samples of Bovine Theileriosis.

Debabrata Dandasena1, Vasundhra Bhandari1, G S Sreenivasamurthy2, Shweta Murthy1, Sonti Roy1, Vandna Bhanot3, Jaspreet Singh Arora4, Satparkash Singh4, Paresh Sharma5.   

Abstract

Theileria annulata is an intracellular parasite that causes active and latent forms of bovine theileriosis. Diagnosis of the disease is primarily based on traditional methods such as microscopy, however, PCR based methods have proven to be superior in the absence of clear disease symptoms. However, diagnosis is difficult in cases of lower parasitaemia by conventional PCR. Hence, a rapid and sensitive method which can detect early infection and low parasite load is required. Therefore, we have developed an absolute quantification based real-time PCR (qPCR) assay. Reference standard curve using recombinant plasmids of a host (hprt) and a parasite gene (tasp) was constructed, and the assay was initially standardised using in vitro T. annulata cell lines. Further, 414 blood samples from suspected theileriosis cases were also evaluated using qPCR. The assay can estimate host to parasite ratios, calculate parasitaemia and treatment effectiveness in the clinical cases of theileriosis. In comparison with the conventional PCR results, 44 additional positive cases were found. Therefore, the assay holds importance in a clinical setting due to its ability to quantify the parasite load in clinical samples. It may be further used in distinguishing active and latent theileriosis infections and detection of drug resistance in the field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30337565      PMCID: PMC6194045          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-33721-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Bovine theileriosis is caused by an apicomplexan parasite Theileria spp. which is an important tick-borne disease of livestock[1]. Theileria annulata and Theileria parva are the two economically important species responsible for livestock morbidity and mortality worldwide[2-4]. In India, T. annulata is the primary causative agent which hampers animal health and productivity[5,6]. The economic loss to the tune of $800 million has been reported due to infection caused by T. annulata in India[7]. It mainly infects cross-breed cattle, however, native breed cattle like water buffalo, and small ruminants are also known to be affected[5]. The prevalence of T. annulata from different parts of India has been reported from 3 to 41% with the help of microscopy and molecular tests[8,9]. The existing diagnostic tools include microscopy, PCR, and serological assays. The need of the hour is a sensitive, and reliable diagnostic tool which can perform timely detection along with an estimation of host-parasite ratio of clinical samples. The life cycle of T. annulata is complex, the tick vector while feeding on cattle releases the sporozoites in the bloodstream, which later enters into the host leukocytes (monocytes or B-lymphocytes)[10,11]. Following host leukocyte invasion, T. annulata hijacks the host cell machinery and transforms the cells with a cancer-like phenotype[11]. T. annulata parasites multiply in synchrony along with the host cells and form schizonts which is the symptomatic stage of the disease. The transformed T. annulata infected bovine leukocyte cells can be cultured in vitro for an infinite time in the parasite-specific culture medium. Currently, an attenuated T. annulata schizont stage vaccine is available in India for controlling the disease[12,13]. The diagnosis of theileriosis heavily relies on the microscopy, where Giemsa stain is used to check for Theileria infected multinucleated host cells (Koch’s bodies) and the piroplasm stage in the blood smear[14]. Microscopy has certain drawbacks of being tedious, labour intensive, misleading (due to similar morphological features with other parasites like Babesia), and also require an expert technician[15,16]. However, the technique is not effective in early diagnosis due to low parasitaemia[16]. Molecular diagnosis using conventional PCR based on several T. annulata specific genes, 18S rRNA, T. annulata merozoite surface protein (tams), T. annulata sporozoite surface protein (tasp) or Cytochrome III, and serological assays using TASP and TAMS antigens are still used for diagnostic purpose[16-20]. Recently, Real-time quantitative PCR based on the 18s rRNA and tams genes have been used for detection of the T. annulata parasites[21-24]. The surfacing problem of drug resistance against the current anti-Theileria drug buparvaquone (BPQ) also presses the need for a better diagnostic tool in evaluating treatment response[22,25-27]. However, none of the current tools helps in identifying the host to parasite ratio, parasite burden, and chemotherapy response. When compared to the other apicomplexan parasite like Plasmodium falciparum, which resides in RBC cell (nonnucleated), diagnosis of Theileria parasites poses challenge owing to their complex life cycle inside bovine leukocytes. The high sensitivity of the real-time PCR technique makes it an appropriate method for early disease diagnosis and parasite quantification[28,29]. In line with the current scenario, we have developed a qPCR assay which will help in identifying the parasite burden, host to parasite ratio and as well as treatment response in the field.

Result

Sensitivity, PCR Efficiency, and Standard curve analysis

A single copy gene specific (hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1, hprt) to the host and the parasite (Theileria annulata surface protein, tasp) was used to quantify the host-parasite DNA[30]. The hprt and tasp were amplified using the gene-specific primers and cloned into the pBSK plasmid. The melting curve for the tasp and hprt showed a single peak at 78.72 °C and 84.57 °C, respectively for the reference plasmid DNA and the biological sample. The PCR sensitivity was determined by serially diluted DNA from 10 ng to 1fg. Amplification was detected until the lowest DNA dilution of 1fg, and the Cq values ranged from 14.23 ± 0.28 (10 ng) to 30.94 ± 0.32 (1fg). The Gene Copy Number (GCN) of the two plasmids were calculated using the standard formula mentioned below in material and methods. The standard curve was plotted by serially diluting (1:10) the hprt and tasp plasmid constructs starting from the 106 to 10 GCN. A Cq value was obtained for each dilution, and three replicates were used for each dilution. The average Cq values were plotted against each respective GCN dilutions for both the plasmid constructs (Table 1). The slope of the standard curve was found to be −3.04 for hprt plasmid and −3.12 for the tasp plasmid. The correlation coefficient (r2) for the PCR reaction was found to be 0.99 while the PCR efficiency was 112% and 109% for the hprt and the tasp plasmid, respectively. A negative template control and uninfected cattle DNA samples were run to check for any contamination during the PCR runs.
Table 1

Quantification of gene copies of hprt and tasp by qPCR.

Gene Copy Numberhprt (Cq ± SD)tasp (Cq ± SD)
1.00E + 0617.01 ± 0.1218.80 ± 0.72
1.00E + 0520.77 ± 0.5721.27 ± 0.19
1.00E + 0423.79 ± 0.0625.05 ± 0.08
1.00E + 0327.45 ± 0.3328.65 ± 0.28
1.00E + 0230.03 ± 0.1031.75 ± 1.63
1.00E + 0132.07 ± 0.2533.59 ± 0.28
Quantification of gene copies of hprt and tasp by qPCR.

Host-Parasite DNA Quantification

The host-parasite DNA was quantified from the in vitro T. annulata infected host leukocytes cell lines. A qPCR was first performed using the T. annulata cell lines against the hprt and tasp genes. The Cq values obtained were used to calculate the GCN of the host and parasite DNA in the cell lines in reference to the standard curve plotted using the hprt and tasp plasmid constructs. The GCN of the host was divided by a factor of 2 owing to its diploid genome. The GCN values were further used to calculate the host and parasite DNA ratio using the equation 2. In the 5 cell lines used for DNA quantification, the parasite DNA (%) was found to be ranging from 1.47 ± 0.53% to 5.94 ± 0.30% (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

Parasite DNA percentage in the bovine cells infected with Theileria annulata.

Parasite DNA percentage in the bovine cells infected with Theileria annulata.

Parasite load in the clinical cases of bovine theileriosis

The DNA was isolated from the whole blood collected from 414 cattle suspected for bovine theileriosis. PCR using 18S rRNA and tasp gene were done for all samples to check for T. annulata infection. Out of 414 samples, only 219 were PCR positive, however, when checked with real-time PCR 243 samples were found to be positive. Further, the Cq values obtained for each sample was used for identifying the parasite load in the clinical samples using equation mentioned in material and method. The parasite load ranged from 3.18E + 05 to 2.54E + 10 (Fig. 2). The samples in which Cq value ≥ 36.94 ± 0.25, i.e. the Cq value of negative template control (NTC) were considered as negative.
Figure 2

Scatter plot representing the parasitaemia (T. annulata/ml of blood) in blood samples of clinical cases. Parasite load was calculated for blood samples of cattle infected with T. annulata. Real-time PCR was carried out and the Ct value obtained was used for estimating the parasitaemia (T. annulata/ml).

Scatter plot representing the parasitaemia (T. annulata/ml of blood) in blood samples of clinical cases. Parasite load was calculated for blood samples of cattle infected with T. annulata. Real-time PCR was carried out and the Ct value obtained was used for estimating the parasitaemia (T. annulata/ml).

Analysis of the Parasite DNA before and after drug treatment

To monitor the response of the chemotherapy, a blood sample was collected from infected cattle before and after 10 days after the treatment. Microscopy and, and real-time PCR analysis was done from the pre and post-treatment sample to determine the treatment efficacy. The real-time PCR analysis showed a reduction of parasite DNA from 72.54 ± 4.55% to 0.01 ± 0.003% after treatment, suggesting parasite clearance (Fig. 3A). Blood smears examination also revealed the absence of piroplasm in post-treatment as compared to pre-treatment blood sample. Similarly, real-time PCR was also performed on a DNA sample of cell lines treated and untreated with BPQ. DNA was isolated from the cell lines after 48 and 72 hrs of BPQ treatment to monitor the parasite growth. After, 48 hr the % parasite DNA was 3.84 ± 0.13% in control cell lines and got reduced to 1.41 ± 0.05% in treated cells (Fig. 3B). Similarly, after 72 hr, control cells exhibited 4.05 ± 0.29% parasite DNA, whereas, the treated cells had 1.55 ± 0.02% of parasitic DNA in them.
Figure 3

Reduction in % parasite DNA after Buparvaquone (BPQ) treatment. (A) A clinical case at pre-treatment and 10 days post-treatment with buparvaquone. (B) % Reduction of parasite DNA in T. annulata infected cell lines after treating with buparvaquone at 48 and 72 hours. The bar represents % parasite DNA ± SD.

Reduction in % parasite DNA after Buparvaquone (BPQ) treatment. (A) A clinical case at pre-treatment and 10 days post-treatment with buparvaquone. (B) % Reduction of parasite DNA in T. annulata infected cell lines after treating with buparvaquone at 48 and 72 hours. The bar represents % parasite DNA ± SD.

Discussion

A quick, sensitive and specific diagnostic tool is a must for effective control of bovine theileriosis. qPCR has served as an efficient tool for detection and quantification of the parasites of various diseases. In the present study, we have developed a diagnostic assay which will help us in the diagnosis and quantification of T. annulata parasite and also monitor treatment effectiveness. Although the assay has limitations and could not differentiate between infected and vaccinated animals. Due to insufficient studies on the differences among vaccinated and T. annulata infected animals, until a date no molecules/gene have been identified which can differentiate between the two groups. The real-time PCR is based on the absolute quantification method using recombinant plasmids corresponding to single copy genes specific to the parasite, (tasp) and the host (hprt). In a previously published report, 18S rRNA based qPCR for detection and quantification of T. annulata was used, however, owing to its multi-copies in the single genome and sequence similarity among various Theileria and Babesia parasites, it may pose several disadvantages and limitations in testing clinical samples[30,31]. We have utilised parasite gene tasp, which is preferred over other determinants such as 18S rRNA, TAMS gene of T. annulata for diagnosis[23,31-33]. We have developed a qPCR assay, in which reference standard curves were generated for calculating host and parasite ratios in the clinical samples. This approach has been utilised earlier on four T. parva cell lines, however, there is no such report on T. annulata[30]. In the cell lines analysed, we have found the % parasite DNA varied from 1.47% to 5.94%, which is in line with earlier studies on T. parva cell lines which showed it to be 0.9% to 3%. Less amount of % parasite DNA in the cell lines corresponds to the fact that parasite genome is quite smaller in comparison to bovine genome[30]. The advantage of calculating the host-parasite ratios will provide useful insights to understand host-pathogen biology and assist in various experimental approaches, e.g. use of sample with higher parasite load for performing whole genome sequencing of the parasite Further, we have also performed qPCR on 414 bovine blood samples. 44 additional samples were diagnosed as infected by qPCR in comparison to conventional PCR due to presence of low parasitemia. The parasite load in the clinical samples was found to be ranging from 3.18E + 05 to 2.54E + 10 parasites/mL of blood. Ros-Garcia et al., 2012 reported the development of a real-time PCR assay for quantification of parasite load, however, it cannot calculate the host-parasite ratios[21]. However, with our assay, we can calculate both the host-parasite ratios and as well as parasitaemia in clinical samples. The assay also provides an additional benefit of quantifying parasite load in clinical samples, which would pave a way to distinguish between active and carrier animals. However, studies on more sample number and its correlation with the clinical profile will be required to establish the same. BPQ was selected for treatment of theileriosis due to low toxicity and a long plasma half-life of 7 days[34]. However, a prepatent period of 10–13 days is observed from tick feeding on to cattle blood to onset of fever and clinical symptoms. If the diagnosis followed by the treatment is delayed, it results in animal death. Therefore, timely diagnosis, as well as monitoring treatment response are crucial for disease control and drug resistance. Earlier report has observed parasite clearance after 8–10 days of BPQ treatment[35]. Therefore, we monitored the parasite load in cattle before and after 10 days of treatment and observed a marked decrease in the parasitaemia indicating the treatment was effective. Similarly, the same approach was tested in T. annulata cell lines incubated with the BPQ for 48 to 72 hrs. In all the cases, we observed a decrease in the % parasite DNA, indicating parasite death. This assay holds importance in calculating the ratio of the parasite DNA in the bovine host which will further help in answering various research questions. Further, it can lead to monitoring the decrease in parasite load in clinical cases to assess the animal clinical state and treatment effectiveness.

Materials and Methods

Sample Collection, DNA Isolation, and Theileria Specific PCR

Blood samples were collected from cattle belonging to different endemic regions of India. Samples were collected and preserved in EDTA by a trained veterinarian. A total of 414 blood samples were collected from suspected cases of theileriosis (showing clinical symptoms) from different states, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Punjab, and Haryana. Study design and reporting follow the Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy (STARD-2015: http://www.stard-statement.org/) (S1 Flow Diagram). Genomic DNA was isolated from 2 ml of blood samples using previously published DNA isolation protocol[1]. Quality and integrity of the DNA were checked using Nanodrop and by running the genomic DNA on 0.8% agarose gel. After the quality check DNA samples were stored at −80 °C until further experiments. T. annulata specific 18S rRNA and tasp gene primers were used for conventional and qPCR (Table 1). The PCR conditions for the primers mentioned above are as follows: 18S rRNA: 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 61 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 30 s, and a final extension of 3 min at 72 °C. tasp: 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 1 min, 55 °C for 1 min, 72 °C and 1 min and a final extension of 5 min at 72 °C 5 min. gDNA from pre-established in vitro culture of Theileria infected bovine cell line was used as positive control, and no template control was used for ruling out any contamination.

Cloning of the hprt and the tasp gene

The pBSK plasmid was used for cloning the genes. Briefly, the hprt and tasp genes were amplified from Bovine cells and T. annulata cell line respectively using the thermal cycles below: hprt: 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 1 min, 60 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 1 min and a final extension of 72 °C for 5 min. tasp: 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 1 min, 55 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 1 min and a a final extension of 72 °C for 5 min. The primer sequences are given in Table 1. The amplified products were cloned into a pBSK plasmid using the TA cloning method as described earlier (https://www.thermofisher.com/in/en/home/life-science/cloning/ta-cloning-kits.html). Later pBSK was transformed into the Top10 cells competent E. coli cells, and cloned plasmids were selected by growing cells in an ampicillin medium. Cloned plasmids were confirmed by restriction digestion using XcmI and Sanger sequencing using gene-specific primers. The NCBI Nucleotide database was queried to confirm the gene sequences.

qPCR SYBR Green Based Assay

Primers for use with intercalating dye-based qPCR were designed using Primer 3 software for tasp and hprt genes. The analysis was carried out on an Applied Biosystems 7500. Melting curve analysis was done for both the primers showing single and specific peaks. 6 Tenfold serial dilution (106 to 10 GCN) of the pBSK-hprt and pBSK-tasp plasmids were used for generating the standard curve (Table 2).
Table 2

List of primers used in the study.

GeneSequence (5′-3′)Product size (bp)
hprt-for ATGGCGGCCCGCAGCCCCAGC657
hprt-rev TTAGGCTTTGTATTTTGCTTTTC657
tasp-for TTGCGAATGCGGTCCATTTC1065
tasp-rev CTGGCAGGGTGAGAACGTAA1065
18s-rrna-for ACGACTCCTTCAGCAC CTTG125
18s-rrna-rev AAATTAAGCCGCAGCTCCAC125
qhprt-for TGGACAGGACCGAACGGCT115
qhprt-rev TAATCCAACAGGTCGGCAAG115
qtasp-for ATAAGCGCCCGAAGGGTAAT160
qtasp-rev CCACCAGTCAAACGCTACAG160
List of primers used in the study.

In vitro culture of the T. annulata infected bovine lymphocyte cell line

T. annulata infected leukocyte culture were established by isolating the PBMCs from the clinically infected cattle[1]. Briefly, isolated PBMCs were cultured in the RPMI 1640 medium with 10% FBS and Pen/Strep (100 µg/ml) solution at 37 °C with 5% CO2. T. annulata infected bovine cells transform and continue to grow in vitro condition for an infinite time. T. annulata parasites inside the bovine cells were confirmed by PCR using tasp specific primers.

Monitoring treatment response using qPCR assay

First, the efficacy of BPQ was checked on T. annulata cell line. 2.5 × 105 cells/ml of T. annulata cell line was dispensed in a 6-well tissue culture plate. Further, BPQ was added at the concentration of 50 ng/ml to the test wells, and DNA was isolated from the wells after 48 and 72 hr of incubation. Cells without BPQ were treated as control, and gDNA was isolated. Similarly, the treatment response in a T. annulata infected cattle was also checked by collecting blood samples before and after 10 days of the BPQ treatment. All the experiments were done in triplicate. qPCR was done to check the parasitaemia in the cell line before and after treatment.

GCN calculation

The gene copy of the plasmids was calculated using the below-mentioned equation[30].In the equation, The cloned tasp and hprt gene in a pBSK cloning vector (pBSK-tasp & pBSK-hprt) were 10 fold serially diluted up to 6 dilutions ranging from 106 to 10 copy/µl. The standard curve was plotted as copy number vs. Cq value for each of the dilutions in triplicates for pBSK-tasp and pBSK-hprt respectively.

Estimation of Host-Parasite DNA ratio

The host to parasite DNA ratio was calculated using equation 2 as mentioned below. As the bovine cells are diploid, the number of bovine cells were considered to be half the GCN of the hprt gene. As the parasite is in the haploid state while surviving inside host cells, the number of parasite cells is considered equivalent to GCN of the tasp gene[30]. The GCN was then used to calculate the amount of host and parasite DNA in the tested sample.

Parasite Load Calculation

The parasitaemia in each sample was calculated as described earlier[21]. Briefly, the estimated parasite gene copy number (Q) obtained from the above-described method was used in the below-mentioned equation to calculate the T. annulata cells per ml of bloodwhere VB = Volume of blood, 1000 ul VEX = sample volume extracted, 2000 ul VEL = Elute volume, 100 ul VT = Template used for PCR, 1 ul CN = Gene copy number (2 copies per genome)

Ethical approval and informed consent

Oral consent was taken from the farm owners before drawing blood from animals. There is no specific law in India which requires permission from the ethics committee for collecting less than 5 ml of blood. Further, blood samples were collected by professional veterinarians.
  33 in total

1.  Real-time quantitative PCR in parasitology.

Authors:  Andrew Bell; Lisa Ranford-Cartwright
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2002-08-01

2.  Treatment of experimentally induced Theileria annulata infection in cross-bred calves with buparvaquone.

Authors:  S Dhar; D V Malhotra; C Bhushan; O P Gautam
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.738

3.  Genome of the host-cell transforming parasite Theileria annulata compared with T. parva.

Authors:  Arnab Pain; Hubert Renauld; Matthew Berriman; Lee Murphy; Corin A Yeats; William Weir; Arnaud Kerhornou; Martin Aslett; Richard Bishop; Christiane Bouchier; Madeleine Cochet; Richard M R Coulson; Ann Cronin; Etienne P de Villiers; Audrey Fraser; Nigel Fosker; Malcolm Gardner; Arlette Goble; Sam Griffiths-Jones; David E Harris; Frank Katzer; Natasha Larke; Angela Lord; Pascal Maser; Sue McKellar; Paul Mooney; Fraser Morton; Vishvanath Nene; Susan O'Neil; Claire Price; Michael A Quail; Ester Rabbinowitsch; Neil D Rawlings; Simon Rutter; David Saunders; Kathy Seeger; Trushar Shah; Robert Squares; Steven Squares; Adrian Tivey; Alan R Walker; John Woodward; Dirk A E Dobbelaere; Gordon Langsley; Marie-Adele Rajandream; Declan McKeever; Brian Shiels; Andrew Tait; Bart Barrell; Neil Hall
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Vaccine potential of recombinant antigens of Theileria annulata and Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum against vector and parasite.

Authors:  L Jeyabal; Binod Kumar; Debdatta Ray; Palavesam Azahahianambi; Srikanta Ghosh
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.738

Review 5.  Problem of ticks and tick-borne diseases in India with special emphasis on progress in tick control research: a review.

Authors:  Srikant Ghosh; Gaurav Nagar
Journal:  J Vector Borne Dis       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.688

6.  Detection of theileriosis in cattle and buffaloes by polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  V R Kundave; A K Patel; P V Patel; J J Hasnani; C G Joshi
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2013-11-19

7.  Sequence Polymorphism of Cytochrome b Gene in Theileria annulata Tunisian Isolates and Its Association with Buparvaquone Treatment Failure.

Authors:  Moez Mhadhbi; Melek Chaouch; Kaouthar Ajroud; Mohamed Aziz Darghouth; Souha BenAbderrazak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Development and evaluation of a real-time PCR assay for the quantitative detection of Theileria annulata in cattle.

Authors:  Amaia Ros-García; Antoni Nicolás; Ana L García-Pérez; Ramón A Juste; Ana Hurtado
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  Molecular and Phylogenetic analysis revealed new genotypes of Theileria annulata parasites from India.

Authors:  Neena George; Vasundhra Bhandari; D Peddi Reddy; Paresh Sharma
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Absolute Quantification of the Host-To-Parasite DNA Ratio in Theileria parva-Infected Lymphocyte Cell Lines.

Authors:  Hanzel T Gotia; James B Munro; Donald P Knowles; Claudia A Daubenberger; Richard P Bishop; Joana C Silva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Molecular detection of Theileria annulata infection in cattle by conventional PCR and quantitative real time PCR in India.

Authors:  Ahmed Magdy Selim; Manoranjan Das; Santosh Kumar Senapati; Geeta Rani Jena; Chinmoy Mishra; Indramani Nath; Shantibhusan Senapati; Manisha Sethi
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2020-09-25

2.  Extracellular vesicles in infectious diseases caused by protozoan parasites in buffaloes.

Authors:  Leticia Gomes de Pontes; Wanessa Fernanda Altei; Asier Galan; Petra Bilić; Nicolas Guillemin; Josipa Kuleš; Anita Horvatić; Lígia Nunes de Morais Ribeiro; Eneida de Paula; Virgínia Bodelão Richini Pereira; Simone Baldini Lucheis; Vladimir Mrljak; Peter David Eckersall; Rui Seabra Ferreira; Lucilene Delazari Dos Santos
Journal:  J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis       Date:  2020-05-29

3.  Population Genetic Analysis of the Theileria annulata Parasites Identified Limited Diversity and Multiplicity of Infection in the Vaccine From India.

Authors:  Sonti Roy; Vasundhra Bhandari; Madhumanti Barman; Pankaj Kumar; Vandna Bhanot; Jaspreet Singh Arora; Satparkash Singh; Paresh Sharma
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 4.  Prevention of tick-borne diseases: challenge to recent medicine.

Authors:  Dominika Hromníková; Daniel Furka; Samuel Furka; Julio Ariel Dueñas Santana; Táňa Ravingerová; Vanda Klöcklerová; Dušan Žitňan
Journal:  Biologia (Bratisl)       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 1.653

5.  A Multi-copy Nucleic Acid-Based Diagnostic Test for Bovine Tropical Theileriosis.

Authors:  Aquil Mohmad; B C Saravanan; H V Manjunathachar; Dinesh Chandra; Sheikh Firdous Ahmad; Waseem Akram Malla; Bilal Ahmad Malla; Nisha Bisht; Ishfaq Maqbool
Journal:  Acta Parasitol       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 1.440

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.