Tibor Hortobágyi1, Azusa Uematsu2, Lianne Sanders3, Reinhold Kliegl4,5, József Tollár6, Renato Moraes7, Urs Granacher5. 1. Center for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands, t.hortobagyi@umcg.nl. 2. Dokkyo Medical University, Shimotsuga-gun, Japan. 3. Center for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany. 5. Division of Training and Movement Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany. 6. Department of Neurology, Somogy County Kaposi Mór Teaching Hospital, Kaposvár, Hungary. 7. School of Physical Education and Sport of Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dynamic balance keeps the vertical projection of the center of mass within the base of support while walking. Dynamic balance tests are used to predict the risks of falls and eventual falls. The psychometric properties of most dynamic balance tests are unsatisfactory and do not comprise an actual loss of balance while walking. OBJECTIVES: Using beam walking distance as a measure of dynamic balance, the BEAM consortium will determine the psychometric properties, lifespan and patient reference values, the relationship with selected "dynamic balance tests," and the accuracy of beam walking distance to predict falls. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study will examine healthy adults in 7 decades (n = 432) at 4 centers. Center 5 will examine patients (n = 100) diagnosed with Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, stroke, and balance disorders. In test 1, all participants will be measured for demographics, medical history, muscle strength, gait, static balance, dynamic balance using beam walking under single (beam walking only) and dual task conditions (beam walking while concurrently performing an arithmetic task), and several cognitive functions. Patients and healthy participants age 50 years or older will be additionally measured for fear of falling, history of falls, miniBESTest, functional reach on a force platform, timed up and go, and reactive balance. All participants age 50 years or older will be recalled to report fear of falling and fall history 6 and 12 months after test 1. In test 2, seven to ten days after test 1, healthy young adults and age 50 years or older (n = 40) will be retested for reliability of beam walking performance. CONCLUSION: We expect to find that beam walking performance vis-à-vis the traditionally used balance outcomes predicts more accurately fall risks and falls. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03532984.
BACKGROUND: Dynamic balance keeps the vertical projection of the center of mass within the base of support while walking. Dynamic balance tests are used to predict the risks of falls and eventual falls. The psychometric properties of most dynamic balance tests are unsatisfactory and do not comprise an actual loss of balance while walking. OBJECTIVES: Using beam walking distance as a measure of dynamic balance, the BEAM consortium will determine the psychometric properties, lifespan and patient reference values, the relationship with selected "dynamic balance tests," and the accuracy of beam walking distance to predict falls. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study will examine healthy adults in 7 decades (n = 432) at 4 centers. Center 5 will examine patients (n = 100) diagnosed with Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, stroke, and balance disorders. In test 1, all participants will be measured for demographics, medical history, muscle strength, gait, static balance, dynamic balance using beam walking under single (beam walking only) and dual task conditions (beam walking while concurrently performing an arithmetic task), and several cognitive functions. Patients and healthy participants age 50 years or older will be additionally measured for fear of falling, history of falls, miniBESTest, functional reach on a force platform, timed up and go, and reactive balance. All participants age 50 years or older will be recalled to report fear of falling and fall history 6 and 12 months after test 1. In test 2, seven to ten days after test 1, healthy young adults and age 50 years or older (n = 40) will be retested for reliability of beam walking performance. CONCLUSION: We expect to find that beam walking performance vis-à-vis the traditionally used balance outcomes predicts more accurately fall risks and falls. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03532984.
Authors: N B Alexander; J M Mollo; B Giordani; J A Ashton-Miller; A B Schultz; J A Grunawalt; N L Foster Journal: Neurology Date: 1995-05 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Melanie K Farlie; Lauren Robins; Romi Haas; Jennifer L Keating; Elizabeth Molloy; Terry P Haines Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Katherine S Hall; Harvey J Cohen; Carl F Pieper; Gerda G Fillenbaum; William E Kraus; Kim M Huffman; Melissa A Cornish; Andrew Shiloh; Christy Flynn; Richard Sloane; L Kristin Newby; Miriam C Morey Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Andréia Abud da Silva Costa; Tibor Hortobágyi; Rob den Otter; Andrew Sawers; Renato Moraes Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-04-27 Impact factor: 4.996