OBJECTIVE: Assessment approaches for food addiction in younger samples have not been updated to reflect recently revised diagnostic approaches for addictive disorders. The aim of the current study is to develop a new dimensional approach to assess food addiction in adolescents that is psychometrically sound, developmentally appropriate, and reflective of the updated diagnostic criteria. METHODS: The dimensional Yale Food Addiction Scale for Children 2.0 (dYFAS-C 2.0) and related measures were administered to 127 adolescents from the community in the United States. Endorsement rates for each question were reviewed, and the psychometric properties were evaluated. RESULTS: Problem-focused symptoms had low endorsement rates and were excluded from the final version of the scale. The dYFAS-C 2.0 demonstrated partial evidence for a one-factor structure, had good internal consistency reliability, and was positively associated with emotional eating, external eating, and body mass index (BMI). The dYFAS-C 2.0 also accounted for unique variance in BMI. Unexpectedly, the dYFAS-C 2.0 was positively associated with restrained eating. CONCLUSIONS: The dYFAS-C 2.0 appears to have adequate psychometric properties for assessing food addiction in community samples of adolescents. Future research should evaluate the measure in clinical samples and investigate the association between food addiction and restrained eating over the lifespan.
OBJECTIVE: Assessment approaches for food addiction in younger samples have not been updated to reflect recently revised diagnostic approaches for addictive disorders. The aim of the current study is to develop a new dimensional approach to assess food addiction in adolescents that is psychometrically sound, developmentally appropriate, and reflective of the updated diagnostic criteria. METHODS: The dimensional Yale Food Addiction Scale for Children 2.0 (dYFAS-C 2.0) and related measures were administered to 127 adolescents from the community in the United States. Endorsement rates for each question were reviewed, and the psychometric properties were evaluated. RESULTS: Problem-focused symptoms had low endorsement rates and were excluded from the final version of the scale. The dYFAS-C 2.0 demonstrated partial evidence for a one-factor structure, had good internal consistency reliability, and was positively associated with emotional eating, external eating, and body mass index (BMI). The dYFAS-C 2.0 also accounted for unique variance in BMI. Unexpectedly, the dYFAS-C 2.0 was positively associated with restrained eating. CONCLUSIONS: The dYFAS-C 2.0 appears to have adequate psychometric properties for assessing food addiction in community samples of adolescents. Future research should evaluate the measure in clinical samples and investigate the association between food addiction and restrained eating over the lifespan.
Authors: Paul Brunault; Robert Courtois; Ashley N Gearhardt; Philippe Gaillard; Kevin Journiac; Sarah Cathelain; Christian Réveillère; Nicolas Ballon Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2016-10-08 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Eun-Jin Park; Samuel Suk-Hyun Hwang; Mi-Sun Lee; Soo-Young Bhang Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-19 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Emma T Schiestl; Julia M Rios; Lindsey Parnarouskis; Jenna R Cummings; Ashley N Gearhardt Journal: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry Date: 2020-10-28 Impact factor: 5.067
Authors: Sarah E Domoff; Emma Q Sutherland; Sonja Yokum; Ashley N Gearhardt Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 3.390