| Literature DB >> 34975554 |
Hong-Juan Li1, Jie Li2, Meng Qi3, Tian-He Song3, Jing-Xu Chen1.
Abstract
Self-control is very important for the adaptation among adolescents. It is associated with depression and tendencies of eating disorders. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the two and the mediating role of self-control for adolescents. In total, 1,231 adolescents (11-18 years) participated in this study. Self-control, depression, and tendencies of eating disorders were evaluated using the Dual-Mode of Self-Control Scale (DMSC-S), 11-item Kutcher Adolescent Depression Scale (KADS-11), and Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26). The correlations among these factors were analyzed using mediating effect models. Girls had higher scores on the both subscales (impulse system and control system) of DMSC-S (P < 0.001). Those between 15-18 years had higher scores on impulse system than those between 11-14 years (P < 0.001). A significant mediating effect (12.8%) of the impulse system was observed between depression and tendencies of eating disorders in adolescents.Entities:
Keywords: adolescents; depression; eating disorder; mediating effect; self-control
Year: 2021 PMID: 34975554 PMCID: PMC8718404 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.690245
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 4.157
Socio-demographic characteristics and association with depression and risk of disordered eating attitudes (N = 1,231).
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Gender | 0.872 |
| ||||||
| Male | 587 | 47.6 | 248 | 42.2 | 32 | 5.5 | ||
| Female | 644 | 52.3 | 275 | 42.7 | 74 | 11.5 | ||
| Age group | 0.380 | 0.073 | ||||||
| 11–14 years | 679 | 55.2 | 290 | 42.7 | 48 | 7.1 | ||
| 15–18 years | 552 | 44.8 | 228 | 41.3 | 56 | 10.1 | ||
| Region | 0.089 |
| ||||||
| Rural | 670 | 54.4 | 299 | 44.6 | 40 | 6.0 | ||
| Urban | 561 | 45.6 | 223 | 39.8 | 66 | 11.8 | ||
| Body weight perception | 0.908 |
| ||||||
| Normal weight | 192 | 15.6 | 165 | 85.9 | 23 | 12.0 | ||
| Underweight | 334 | 27.1 | 138 | 41.3 | 7 | 2.1 | ||
| Overweight | 705 | 57.3 | 220 | 31.2 | 76 | 10.8 | ||
| Depression | 523 | 42.5 | – | – | – | 62 | 11.9 |
|
| Disordered eating attitudes | 106 | 8.6 | 62 | 11.9 |
| – | – | – |
P < 0.001 means the difference is statistically significant.
Relationship between socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of DMSC-S (N = 1,231).
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Gender |
|
| ||
| Male | 29.76, 8.78 | 29 (25, 33) | ||
| Female | 30.98, 8.30 | 30 (26, 33) | ||
| Age group |
|
| ||
| 11–14 years | 29.36, 8.24 | 29 (25, 33) | ||
| 15–18 years | 31.63, 8.73 | 29 (25, 32) | ||
| Region |
|
| ||
| Rural | 30.54, 8.53 | 29 (25, 33) | ||
| Urban | 30.27, 8.57 | 29 (26, 33) | ||
| Body weight perception | 0.158 |
| ||
| Normal weight | 30 (24, 36) | 30 (26, 33) | ||
| Underweight | 29 (25, 35) |
| 28 (25, 32) |
|
| Overweight | 31 (25, 37) |
| 29 (25, 33) |
|
| Depression |
|
| ||
| Yes | 31.03, 9.03 | 30 (26, 33) | ||
| No | 29.95, 8.13 | 29 (25, 32) | ||
| Disordered eating attitudes |
|
| ||
| Yes | 36.55, 8.38 | 28 (24, 33) | ||
| No | 29.69, 8.27 | 29 (26, 33) | ||
P < 0.001 means the difference is statistically significant.
Correlation factor analysis of the each factor of DMSC-S.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Future time perspective | 0.121 | 0.161 | −0.029 | −0.109 |
| Problem solving | 0.134 | 0.165 | −0.103 | 0.049 |
| Impulsivity | 0.116 | 0.058 | 0.290 | 0.304 |
| Distractibility | 0.036 | 0.027 | 0.206 | 0.237 |
| Poor delay of gratification | 0.080 | 0.012 | 0.199 | 0.235 |
P < 0.0083.
Analysis of total effect, direct effect, and indirect effect.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Total effect | 0.4246 | 0.0517 | 0.3232 | 0.5259 | |
| Direct effect | 0.3701 | 0.0491 | 0.2738 | 0.4665 | 87.2% |
| Indirect effect | 0.0544 | 0.0224 | 0.0116 | 0.0999 | 12.8% |
Figure 1The mediating effect of DMSC-S impulse system on depression and disordered eating attitudes. X, Depression; M, DMSC-S impulse system; Y, disordered eating attitudes; a, the regression coefficient of X to M; b, the regression coefficient of M to Y; c, the regression coefficient of X to Y; e1, e2, e3, the regression residual.