Literature DB >> 28120250

Substance Use Disorders in Adolescence Exist along Continua: Taxometric Evidence in an Epidemiological Sample.

Richard T Liu1.   

Abstract

A longstanding nosological question in the clinical literature is whether substance use disorders (SUDs) are best conceptualized as categorical or dimensional phenomena. Taxometric analysis is a statistical approach uniquely developed to address this issue. To date, no taxometric studies have been conducted with SUDs in adolescents. The current taxometric study investigated the latent structure of SUDs in adolescents for four different substances: marijuana, analgesics, hallucinogens, and inhalants. Interview-derived data for DSM-IV SUD symptoms were drawn from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, pooled across the years 2004 to 2013 (unweighted n = 181,573; 48.92% female). Two mathematically non-redundant taxometric methods (MAMBAC [mean above minus below a cut] and MAXEIG [maximum eigenvalue]) were conducted with the data for respondents who had used the substance under study at least once in the past 12 months, or on 5 separate days in the case of marijuana (unweighted ns = 4900 to 17,517). Consistent evidence emerged in support of a dimensional solution across the analyses for all four substances (mean comparison curve fit index = 0.129 to 0.301). The current findings are consistent with the view of SUDs in adolescents as continuous syndromes rather than discrete entities. These findings are also consistent with theoretical conceptualizations of SUDs as having multi-causal etiologies, and have implications for current diagnostic conceptualizations of SUDs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescence; Classification; Substance abuse; Substance dependence; Taxometrics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28120250     DOI: 10.1007/s10802-017-0269-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol        ISSN: 0091-0627


  56 in total

1.  Does attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder have a dimensional latent structure? A taxometric analysis.

Authors:  David K Marcus; Tammy D Barry
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2011-05

2.  Comparing the relative fit of categorical and dimensional latent variable models using consistency tests.

Authors:  John Ruscio; Glenn D Walters; David K Marcus; Walter Kaczetow
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2010-03

Review 3.  Should there be both categorical and dimensional criteria for the substance use disorders in DSM-V?

Authors:  John E Helzer; Wim van den Brink; Sarah E Guth
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 4.  Classification of child and adolescent psychopathology.

Authors:  D P Cantwell
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 8.982

Review 5.  Is clinical depression distinct from subthreshold depressive symptoms? A review of the continuity issue in depression research.

Authors:  A Solomon; D A Haaga; B A Arnow
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.254

6.  A taxometric analysis of psychopathic personality.

Authors:  David K Marcus; Siji L John; John F Edens
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2004-11

7.  A taxometric study of alcohol abuse and dependence in a general population sample: evidence of dimensional latent structure and implications for DSM-V.

Authors:  Tim Slade; Rachel Grove; Maree Teesson
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 8.  The influence of substance use on adolescent brain development.

Authors:  L M Squeglia; J Jacobus; S F Tapert
Journal:  Clin EEG Neurosci       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.843

9.  Using taxometric analysis to distinguish a small latent taxon from a latent dimension with positively skewed indicators: the case of involuntary defeat syndrome.

Authors:  John Ruscio; Ayelet Meron Ruscio; Terence M Keane
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2004-02

10.  Neuropsychosocial profiles of current and future adolescent alcohol misusers.

Authors:  Robert Whelan; Richard Watts; Catherine A Orr; Robert R Althoff; Eric Artiges; Tobias Banaschewski; Gareth J Barker; Arun L W Bokde; Christian Büchel; Fabiana M Carvalho; Patricia J Conrod; Herta Flor; Mira Fauth-Bühler; Vincent Frouin; Juergen Gallinat; Gabriela Gan; Penny Gowland; Andreas Heinz; Bernd Ittermann; Claire Lawrence; Karl Mann; Jean-Luc Martinot; Frauke Nees; Nick Ortiz; Marie-Laure Paillère-Martinot; Tomas Paus; Zdenka Pausova; Marcella Rietschel; Trevor W Robbins; Michael N Smolka; Andreas Ströhle; Gunter Schumann; Hugh Garavan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  4 in total

1.  Progress in achieving quantitative classification of psychopathology.

Authors:  Robert F Krueger; Roman Kotov; David Watson; Miriam K Forbes; Nicholas R Eaton; Camilo J Ruggero; Leonard J Simms; Thomas A Widiger; Thomas M Achenbach; Bo Bach; R Michael Bagby; Marina A Bornovalova; William T Carpenter; Michael Chmielewski; David C Cicero; Lee Anna Clark; Christopher Conway; Barbara DeClercq; Colin G DeYoung; Anna R Docherty; Laura E Drislane; Michael B First; Kelsie T Forbush; Michael Hallquist; John D Haltigan; Christopher J Hopwood; Masha Y Ivanova; Katherine G Jonas; Robert D Latzman; Kristian E Markon; Joshua D Miller; Leslie C Morey; Stephanie N Mullins-Sweatt; Johan Ormel; Praveetha Patalay; Christopher J Patrick; Aaron L Pincus; Darrel A Regier; Ulrich Reininghaus; Leslie A Rescorla; Douglas B Samuel; Martin Sellbom; Alexander J Shackman; Andrew Skodol; Tim Slade; Susan C South; Matthew Sunderland; Jennifer L Tackett; Noah C Venables; Irwin D Waldman; Monika A Waszczuk; Mark H Waugh; Aidan G C Wright; David H Zald; Johannes Zimmermann
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 49.548

2. 

Authors:  Robert F Krueger; Roman Kotov; David Watson; Miriam K Forbes; Nicholas R Eaton; Camilo J Ruggero; Leonard J Simms; Thomas A Widiger; Thomas M Achenbach; Bo Bach; R Michael Bagby; Marina A Bornovalova; William T Carpenter; Michael Chmielewski; David C Cicero; Lee Anna Clark; Christopher Conway; Barbara DeClercq; Colin G DeYoung; Anna R Docherty; Laura E Drislane; Michael B First; Kelsie T Forbush; Michael Hallquist; John D Haltigan; Christopher J Hopwood; Masha Y Ivanova; Katherine G Jonas; Robert D Latzman; Kristian E Markon; Joshua D Miller; Leslie C Morey; Stephanie N Mullins-Sweatt; Johan Ormel; Praveetha Patalay; Christopher J Patrick; Aaron L Pincus; Darrel A Regier; Ulrich Reininghaus; Leslie A Rescorla; Douglas B Samuel; Martin Sellbom; Alexander J Shackman; Andrew Skodol; Tim Slade; Susan C South; Matthew Sunderland; Jennifer L Tackett; Noah C Venables; Irwin D Waldman; Monika A Waszczuk; Mark H Waugh; Aidan G C Wright; David H Zald; Johannes Zimmermann
Journal:  Ann Med Psychol (Paris)       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 0.380

3.  Preliminary validation of the Yale Food Addiction Scale for Children 2.0: A dimensional approach to scoring.

Authors:  Emma T Schiestl; Ashley N Gearhardt
Journal:  Eur Eat Disord Rev       Date:  2018-10-17

4.  Validation of the dimensional Yale Food Addiction Scale for Children 2.0 and estimation of the weighted food addiction score in a sample of adolescents from the general population.

Authors:  Christina Horsager; Emil Færk; Ashley N Gearhardt; Søren Dinesen Østergaard; Marlene Briciet Lauritsen
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 4.652

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.