| Literature DB >> 30333971 |
Patricia Vázquez-Villegas1, Edith Espitia-Saloma1, Mario A Torres-Acosta1, Federico Ruiz-Ruiz1, Marco Rito-Palomares2, Oscar Aguilar1.
Abstract
Aqueous two-phase systems (ATPS) have been reported as an attractive biocompatible extraction system for recovery and purification of biological products. In this work, the implementation, characterization, and optimization (operational and economic) of invertase extraction from spent brewery yeast in a semi-automatized pilot plant using ATPS is reported. Gentian violet was used as tracer for the selection of phase composition through phase entrainment minimization. Yeast suspension was chosen as a complex cell matrix model for the recovery of the industrial relevant enzyme invertase. Flow rates of phases did not have an effect, given that a bottom continuous phase is given, while load of sample and number of agitators improved the recovery of the enzyme. The best combination of factors reached a recovery of 129.35 ± 2.76% and a purification factor of 4.98 ± 1.10 in the bottom phase of a PEG-Phosphate system, also resulting in the removal of inhibitor molecules increasing invertase activity as reported by several other authors. Then, an economic analysis was performed to study the production cost of invertase analyzing only the significant parameters for production. Results indicate that the parameters being analyzed only affect the production cost per enzymatic unit, while variations in the cost per batch are not significant. Moreover, only the sample load is significant, which, combined with operational optimization results, gives the same optimal result for operation, maximizing recovery yield (15% of sample load and 1 static mixer). Overall res ults of these case studies show continuous pilot-scale ATPS as a viable and reproducible extraction/purification system for high added-value biological compounds.Entities:
Keywords: aqueous two-phase system; biosolve; invertase; operational parameters; pilot plant; spent yeast
Year: 2018 PMID: 30333971 PMCID: PMC6175986 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00454
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
Figure 1Front view of the pilot plant configuration (A). Top view diagram (B) showing the main elements: Feeding tanks (T1, T2, T3, T4), Pumps (P1, P2, P3), Static mixers (M), Tubular Coalescer (TC), Gravity Separator (S), Recollecting tanks (T5, T6, T7).
Dimensions of the scaled-up prototype components.
| Feeding tanks | TP tank (T2) volume: 16 L BP tank (T3) volume: 16 L Sample tank (T4) volume: 5.5 L |
| Static mixers | Length: 23.5 cm Internal diameter: 2 cm Void volume: 43.8 cm3 |
| Phase coalescer | Internal diameter: 1 cm Length: adaptable (3-6 m) |
| Separator | Inlet diameter: 1.27 cm Outlets diameter: 0.64 cm Length: 43 cm Width: 7.7 cm Height: 7.7 cm Internal volume: 800 mL |
| Final recollecting tank | TP tank (T5) volume: 23 L IP tank (T6) volume: 23 L BP tank (T7) volume: 23 L |
Variables and levels of the central composite design (CCD) carried out for enzyme recovery from spent brewer's yeast using the pilot plant prototype.
| x1 | Top phase feed flow (mL/min) | 100 | 300 |
| x2 | Bottom phase feed flow (mL/min) | 200 | 400 |
| x3 | Sample load percentage | 5 | 15 |
| x4 | Number of static mixers | 1 | 3 |
Dataset used for model construction in Biosolve Process.
| Capital | Main equipment | $ 35,240.90 | Patmon Automatizacion |
| Static mixer | $ 836.27 | USA Blue Book | |
| Consumables | None Required | $ – | None |
| Labor | Annual Salary (PhD Student in Mexico) | $ 8,520.00 | Conacyt (Mexican Science Council) |
| Materials | Polyethylene Glycol 1,000 (1 kg) | $ 56.20 | Sigma-Aldrich |
| Potassium phosphate monobasic (20 kg) | $ 607.70 | Sigma-Aldrich | |
| Potassium phosphate dibasic (10 kg) | $ 1,020.00 | Sigma-Aldrich |
Figure 2Phase entrainment (E) comparison between System 1 (A) and System 2 (B). Concentration of gentian violet used as tracer in top phase of Systems 1 and 2 (C).
Figure 3Response surface plots for recovery yield (A) and purification factor (B) of invertase from spent brewer's yeast considering the effect of sample load (X3) and number of static mixers (X4).
Results for the economic analysis. Breakdown and totals for cost of Goods per Enzymatic Unit.
| 5% | 1 | 115% | $0.34 | $15.86 | $ – | $4.91 | $1.01 | $22.12 |
| 5% | 3 | 80% | $0.51 | $22.79 | $ – | $7.06 | $1.46 | $31.82 |
| 15% | 1 | 142% | $0.09 | $4.28 | $ – | $1.33 | $0.27 | $5.97 |
| 15% | 3 | 108% | $0.13 | $5.63 | $ – | $1.74 | $0.36 | $7.86 |
Linear regression results.
| 29.71 | 0.0292 | Yes | |
| −1.71 | 0.0339 | Yes | |
| 1.39 | 0.2001 | No |
Equations of linear regression have the form: CoG/EU [US$ x10-3] = β0 + β1 x Sample Load [%] + β2 x Static Mixers [Amount of mixers].
Using a significance level α = 0.05.