| Literature DB >> 30332806 |
Jia-Yu Zhong1, Yuan-Chieh Lee2,3, Chia-Jung Hsieh4, Chun-Chieh Tseng5, Lih-Ming Yiin6.
Abstract
Dry eye disease (DED) has become a common eye disease in recent years and appears to be influenced by environmental factors. This study aimed to examine the association between the first occurrence of DED, air pollution and weather changes in Taiwan. We used the systematic sampling cohort database containing 1,000,000 insureds of the National Health Insurance of Taiwan from 2004 to 2013, and identified a total of 25,818 eligible DED subjects. Environmental data, including those of air pollutants, temperature and relative humidity, were retrieved from the environmental monitoring stations adjacent to subjects' locations of clinics as exposure information. We applied the case-crossover design, which used the same subjects experiencing exposures on diagnosis days as cases and those on other days as controls. The descriptive statistics showed that the first occurrences of DED were the most for the elderly by age (53.6%), women by gender (68.9%), and spring by season (25.9%). Multivariate conditional logistic regression analyses indicated that carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO₂), and temperature were positively associated with DED (p < 0.05), while relative humidity was negatively related (p < 0.001). Because CO and NO₂ together are considered a surrogate of traffic emission, which is easier to control than the uprising temperature, it is suggested that efficient management and control of traffic emission may lower the probability of DED occurrence.Entities:
Keywords: Taiwan; air pollution; dry eye disease; relative humidity; temperature; traffic emission
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30332806 PMCID: PMC6210160 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15102269
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Data for study subjects and all patients at the first occurrence of dry eye disease (DED) by age, gender and season during 2004–2013.
| Study Subjects | All Patients | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 25,818 | 46,907 | |
| Age (Mean ± SD) | 51.1 ± 17.7 | 51.3 ± 17.5 | 0.300 a |
| n (%) | n (%) | ||
| Age | 0.285 b | ||
| <18 | 472 (1.8) | 867 (1.9) | |
| 18~49 | 11,520 (44.6) | 20,644 (44.0) | |
| ≥50 | 13,826 (53.6) | 25,396 (54.1) | |
| Gender | 0.687 b | ||
| Male | 8021 (31.1) | 14,505 (30.9) | |
| Female | 17,797 (68.9) | 32,402 (69.1) | |
| Season | 0.521 b | ||
| Spring | 6684 (25.9) | 12,282 (26.2) | |
| Summer | 6561 (25.4) | 11,931 (25.4) | |
| Fall | 6407 (24.8) | 11,711 (25.0) | |
| Winter | 6166 (23.9) | 10,983 (23.4) |
a two sample t-test; b chi-square test.
Figure 1Annual mean concentrations of gaseous air pollutants (CO, NO2, O3, SO2) from 2004 to 2013 (error bars denote standard deviations), derived from 73 of 76 monitoring sites.
Figure 2Annual averages of particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter ≤2.5 and 10 µm (PM2.5 and PM10) concentrations, relative humidity (RH) and temperature from 2004 to 2013 (error bars denote standard deviations), derived from 73 of 76 monitoring sites.
Spearman correlation among daily air pollutants and meteorological factors.
| CO | NO2 | O3 (8h) | PM2.5 | PM10 | SO2 | RH | Temperature | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO | 1 | |||||||
| NO2 | 0.828 | 1 | ||||||
| O3 (8h) | 0.025 | 0.074 | 1 | |||||
| PM2.5 | 0.429 | 0.533 | 0.503 | 1 | ||||
| PM10 | 0.372 | 0.473 | 0.461 | 0.870 | 1 | |||
| SO2 | 0.346 | 0.529 | 0.160 | 0.480 | 0.455 | 1 | ||
| RH | –0.123 | –0.198 | –0.297 | –0.281 | –0.328 | –0.232 | 1 | |
| Temperature | –0.186 | –0.216 | 0.115 | –0.164 | –0.163 | 0.019 | –0.108 | 1 |
All correlations are significant, p < 0.001.
Multivariate conditional logistic regression analyses between DED, air pollutants and meteorological factors.
| Model 1 a | Model 2 b | Model 3 c | Model 4 d | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | |||||
| CO (ppm) | 1.116 (1.026, 1.214) | 0.010 | - | - | 1.105 (1.004, 1.216) | 0.042 | - | - |
| NO2 (10 ppb) | - | - | 1.068 (1.037, 1.100) | <0.001 | - | - | 1.075 (1.040, 1.111) | <0.001 |
| O3 8h (10 ppb) | 1.000 (0.990, 1.011) | 0.932 | 0.998 (0.998, 1.009) | 0.725 | 1.000 (0.989, 1.011) | 0.960 | 0.997 (0.986, 1.008) | 0.616 |
| PM10 (10 μg/m3) | 1.001 (0.994, 1.009) | 0.717 | 1.000 (0.992, 1.007) | 0.920 | - | - | - | - |
| PM2.5 (10 μg/m3) | - | - | - | - | 1.006 (0.991, 1.022) | 0.422 | 1.001 (0.986, 1.016) | 0.900 |
| SO2 (ppb) | 1.004 (0.996, 1.012) | 0.284 | 0.998 (0.990, 1.006) | 0.621 | 1.006 (0.998, 1.015) | 0.148 | 1.000 (0.991, 1.008) | 0.923 |
| RH (10%) | 0.935 (0.916, 0.954) | <0.001 | 0.930 (0.910, 0.949) | <0.001 | 0.936 (0.916, 0.956) | <0.001 | 0.929 (0.909, 0.949) | <0.001 |
| Temperature (°C) | 1.008 (1.002, 1.013) | 0.004 | 1.010 (1.005, 1.015) | <0.001 | 1.008 (1.003, 1.014) | 0.003 | 1.011 (1.005, 1.016) | <0.001 |
a NO2 and PM2.5 excluded from the model due to collinearity with CO and PM10, respectively; b CO and PM2.5 excluded from the model due to collinearity with NO2 and PM10, respectively; c NO2 and PM10 excluded from the model due to collinearity with CO and PM2.5, respectively; d CO and PM10 excluded from the model due to collinearity with NO2 and PM2.5, respectively. Odds ratio (OR).