Kimberly F Farrand1, Moshe Fridman2, Ipek Özer Stillman3, Debra A Schaumberg4. 1. Shire, Wayne, Pennsylvania. 2. AMF Consulting, Inc., Los Angeles, California. 3. Shire, Lexington, Massachusetts. Electronic address: istillman0@shire.com. 4. Shire, Lexington, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To provide current estimates of the prevalence of diagnosed dry eye disease (DED) and associated demographics among US adults aged ≥18 years. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, population-based survey. METHODS: Data were analyzed from 75 000 participants in the 2013 National Health and Wellness Survey to estimate prevalence/risk of diagnosed DED overall, and by age, sex, insurance, and other demographic factors. We weighted the observed DED prevalence to project estimates to the US adult population and examined associations between demographic factors and DED using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Based on weighted estimates, 6.8% of the US adult population was projected to have diagnosed DED (∼16.4 million people). Prevalence increased with age (18-34 years: 2.7%; ≥75 years: 18.6%) and was higher among women (8.8%; ∼11.1 million) than men (4.5%; ∼5.3 million). After adjustment, there were no substantial differences in prevalence/risk of diagnosed DED by race, education, or US census region. However, there was higher risk of diagnosed DED among those aged 45-54 years (odds ratio [OR]: 1.95; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.74-2.20) and ≥75 years (OR: 4.95; 95% CI: 4.26-5.74), vs those aged 18-34 years. Risk was also higher among women vs men (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.88-2.13) and insured vs uninsured participants (OR: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.85-2.43 for those on government and private insurance vs none). CONCLUSIONS: We estimate that >16 million US adults have diagnosed DED. Prevalence is higher among women than men, increases with age, and is notable among those aged 18-34 years.
PURPOSE: To provide current estimates of the prevalence of diagnosed dry eye disease (DED) and associated demographics among US adults aged ≥18 years. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, population-based survey. METHODS: Data were analyzed from 75 000 participants in the 2013 National Health and Wellness Survey to estimate prevalence/risk of diagnosed DED overall, and by age, sex, insurance, and other demographic factors. We weighted the observed DED prevalence to project estimates to the US adult population and examined associations between demographic factors and DED using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Based on weighted estimates, 6.8% of the US adult population was projected to have diagnosed DED (∼16.4 million people). Prevalence increased with age (18-34 years: 2.7%; ≥75 years: 18.6%) and was higher among women (8.8%; ∼11.1 million) than men (4.5%; ∼5.3 million). After adjustment, there were no substantial differences in prevalence/risk of diagnosed DED by race, education, or US census region. However, there was higher risk of diagnosed DED among those aged 45-54 years (odds ratio [OR]: 1.95; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.74-2.20) and ≥75 years (OR: 4.95; 95% CI: 4.26-5.74), vs those aged 18-34 years. Risk was also higher among women vs men (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.88-2.13) and insured vs uninsured participants (OR: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.85-2.43 for those on government and private insurance vs none). CONCLUSIONS: We estimate that >16 million US adults have diagnosed DED. Prevalence is higher among women than men, increases with age, and is notable among those aged 18-34 years.
Authors: Penny A Asbell; Maureen G Maguire; Ellen Peskin; Vatinee Y Bunya; Eric J Kuklinski Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: William Foulsham; Thomas H Dohlman; Sharad K Mittal; Yukako Taketani; Rohan Bir Singh; Sharmila Masli; Reza Dana Journal: Ocul Surf Date: 2019-06-05 Impact factor: 5.033
Authors: Junyi Wang; Andrea E Calvert; Nihal Kaplan; Kaylin M McMahon; Wending Yang; Kurt Q Lu; Han Peng; C Shad Thaxton; Robert M Lavker Journal: Adv Ther (Weinh) Date: 2020-09-30
Authors: Hannes Stegmann; René M Werkmeister; Martin Pfister; Gerhard Garhöfer; Leopold Schmetterer; Valentin Aranha Dos Santos Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2020-02-20 Impact factor: 3.732