Literature DB >> 28442380

Incidence and risk factors of symptomatic dry eye disease in Asian Malays from the Singapore Malay Eye Study.

Ryan E K Man1, Anuradha R Veerappan1, Shu-Pei Tan1, Eva K Fenwick2, Charumathi Sabanayagam3, Jacqueline Chua4, Yuan-Yuh Leong5, Tien Yin Wong6, Ecosse L Lamoureux6, Ching-Yu Cheng6, Louis Tong7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of symptomatic dry eye disease (SDED) and associated risk factors in a well-characterized cohort of ethnic Malays in Singapore.
METHODS: We included 1682 participants (mean age [SD]: 57 [10]years; 55.4% female) without SDED from the Singapore Malay Eye Study (SiMES), a population-based longitudinal study with baseline examination (SiMES-1) conducted between 2004 and 2006, and follow-up examination (SiMES-2) conducted between 2010 and 2013. SDED was considered to be present if a participant answered "often" or "all the time" to any of the six questions from the Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study dry eye questionnaire. Age-standardized incidence of SDED was calculated as the crude 6-year cumulative incidence standardized to Singapore's population census. Gender-stratified multivariable log-binomial regression models were utilized to determine the independent risk factors of incident SDED.
RESULTS: At the 6-year follow-up, 86 of 1682 participants had developed SDED, which was equivalent to an age-standardized 6-year incidence of 5.1% (95% CI 4.1-6.4%). There were no differences in the incidence of SDED between men and women (P = 0.9). Multivariable models revealed that presence of glaucoma and poorer self-rated health were independently associated with incident SDED in men (P = 0.003 and 0.03, respectively), while contact lens wear (P = 0.002), history of thyroid disease (P = 0.03), and having had cataract surgery (P = 0.02) were predictive of incident SDED in women.
CONCLUSION: One in twenty adult Malays developed SDED over a 6-year period. Risk factors for incident SDED were different between men and women. Future studies and public health interventions should consider this gender-specific difference in risk factors.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidemiology; Incidence; Population-based study; Risk factors; Symptomatic dry eye disease

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28442380     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ocul Surf        ISSN: 1542-0124            Impact factor:   5.033


  5 in total

Review 1.  Diabetes mellitus is associated with dry eye syndrome: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tae Keun Yoo; Ein Oh
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Estimated Annual Economic Burden of Dry Eye Disease Based on a Multi-Center Analysis in China: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Wanju Yang; Yanzhu Luo; Shangcao Wu; Xiaoxia Niu; Yanshuang Yan; Chen Qiao; Wei Ming; Ying Zhang; Haoyu Wang; Dan Chen; Mengying Qi; Lan Ke; Ying Wang; Liping Li; Shaowei Li; Qingyan Zeng
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-01

Review 3.  Association of dry eye disease with smoking: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Muhammad Ali Tariq; Hamza Amin; Bilal Ahmed; Uzair Ali; Ashar Mohiuddin
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 2.969

4.  Identified risk factors for dry eye syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lijun Qian; Wei Wei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Association between Dry Eye Disease, Air Pollution and Weather Changes in Taiwan.

Authors:  Jia-Yu Zhong; Yuan-Chieh Lee; Chia-Jung Hsieh; Chun-Chieh Tseng; Lih-Ming Yiin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.