| Literature DB >> 30332539 |
Justin Bartter1, Helena Diffey2, Ying Hei Yeung1, Fiona O'Leary1, Barbara Häsler2, Wende Maulaga3, Robyn Alders4.
Abstract
Undernutrition resulting from inadequate access to high-quality, nutritious food is a widespread issue in sub-Saharan Africa impacting the health and survival of mothers and their children. Inadequate dietary intake leads to a deficiency in nutrients including calcium, required for growth and physiological functioning. This study investigated the potential of increasing dietary calcium intake by the addition of heat-treated ground eggshell to locally prepared food. A mixed methods approach of literature review, Delphi expert survey and focus group discussions with women of childbearing age in rural Tanzania, were used to assess the practicality, safety, and acceptability of consumption of ground eggshell. Chicken eggshell has high calcium content (380 mg of calcium/gram) and bioavailability comparable to calcium carbonate (~39%) with 1 g sufficient to provide one half of a sub-Saharan African adult female's dietary calcium needs. Salmonella was indicated as the most likely threat to human health through eggshell consumption. Experts agreed that eggshells boiled for 10 min when preparing hard-boiled eggs with a further 20 min cooking of crushed eggshell in staple foods would eliminate identified egg-associated pathogens. Five focus groups (n = 46) indicated eggshells were perceived as waste. However, there was an indication of general acceptance of the approach and a willingness to consider the incorporation of ground eggshells into their diets. Development of suitable communication methods are required to convey benefits and safe preparation methods. Ground eggshell could be a highly equitable method of increasing calcium intakes across rural sub-Saharan Africa where calcium intake is low and village poultry ownership common.Entities:
Keywords: calcium deficiency; diet; egg; food and nutrition security; nutritional adequacy; resource-limited settings
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30332539 PMCID: PMC6221107 DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12649
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Matern Child Nutr ISSN: 1740-8695 Impact factor: 3.092
Calcium requirements by age and reproductive status and contribution of 1 g of chicken eggshell as a percentage of the recommended intake (RI)
| Human life stage | Calcium RI (mg) | Percentage of RI (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Infants and children | ||
| 0–6 months | 300 | 126 |
| 7–12 months | 450 | 84 |
| 1–3 years | 500 | 76 |
| 4–6 years | 550 | 69 |
| 7–9 years | 700 | 54 |
| 10–18 years | 1,000 | 38 |
| Adult—females | ||
| 19 years—menopause | 750 | 50 |
| Postmenopause | 800 | 47 |
| Pregnant (last trimester) | 800 | 47 |
| Lactating | 750 | 50 |
Note. “WHO/FAO theoretical calcium allowance for animal protein intake 20–40 g” recommended intake (RI) (World Health Organization, 2003) by 1 gram of chicken eggshell. Calcium for chicken eggshell was calculated by taking the mean of the three journal articles measuring content, of approximately 378 mg (SD = 14.8) (Brun et al., 2013; Milbradt et al., 2015; A. Schaafsma et al., 2002).
Calcium intake recommendations required to ensure calcium adequacy for the majority of women and children
| WHO/FAO (animal protein intake 20–40 g) | Canada and United States | Australia | WHO/FAO (developed countries) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 2010 | 2006 | 2004 | |
| Human life stage | Recommended intake (RI) (mg/day) | Recommended dietary allowance (RDA) (mg/day) | Recommended dietary intake (RDI) (mg/day) | Recommended intake (RI) (mg/day) |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theoretical calcium allowance. Values based on lower calcium excretion. (World Health Organization, 2003).
(Health Canada, 2010).
(National Health and Medical Research Council, 2006).
Based on Western European, American & Canadian data (World Health Organization, 2003).
Acceptable intake.
Adequate intake.
Likelihood of contamination and possible mode (s) of transmission of common egg‐associated pathogens
| Risk of contamination and mode of transmission of individual pathogens |
Risk of contamination (1 = high; 2 = medium; 3 = low; 4 = negligible) | Mode of transmission |
|---|---|---|
| Common egg‐associated pathogens |
Risk Median (IQR) Min‐max |
Vertical/mechanical/both (n) |
| Avian influenza (HP) |
Low 3 (3–3.5) 3–4 | V(1), M(3), B(1) |
| Avian influenza (LP) |
Low 3 (2–3.5) 2–4 | V(1), M(3), B(1) |
|
|
Low 3 2–3 | M(3) |
| Campylobacter |
Medium 2 (1–4) 1–4 | V(1), M(3) |
| Mycoplasma |
Low 3 (1–3) 1–3 | V(3), B(2) |
| Newcastle disease |
Low 3 (3–3) 3–3 | V(1), M(4) |
| Salmonella |
High 1 (1–2) 1–2 | V(2), B(3) |
|
|
Low 3 (2.5–3.5) 2–4 | M(3), B(1) |
Note. B: both mechanical and vertical; LP: low pathogenic; M: mechanical (microbial transmission to an egg via fomites); HP: high pathogenic; V, vertical (microbial transmission from hen to her chick via the egg).
IQR is not available as two out of five experts chose “Do not know” option.
Expert agreement on risk of individual pathogens to human eggshell consumption in SSA village context
|
Expert agreement (number of experts chose this option out of all members of the panel [ | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This pathogen would be a risk to human consumption of eggshell in SSA villages | With 10‐min boiling and 20‐min cooking time, this pathogen would remain a risk | |||||
| Pathogens | Yes | No |
Uncertain/ Do not know | Yes | No |
Uncertain/ Do not know |
| Avian influenza (HP) | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Avian influenza (LP) | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Bacillus cereus | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| Campylobacter | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Enterobacteriaceae | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Mycoplasma | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Newcastle disease | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Salmonella | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Staphylococcus aureus | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
Note. HP: high pathogenic; LP: low pathogenic.