Literature DB >> 30328073

Investigation of the quantitative accuracy of low-dose amyloid and tau PET imaging.

Ying-Hwey Nai1,2, Shoichi Watanuki3, Manabu Tashiro3, Nobuyuki Okamura4, Hiroshi Watabe5,6.   

Abstract

With the increasing incidence of dementia worldwide, the frequent use of amyloid and tau positron emission tomography imaging requires low-dose protocols for the differential diagnoses of various neurodegenerative diseases and the monitoring of disease progression. In this study, we investigated the feasibility to reduce the PET dose without a significant loss of quantitative accuracy in 3D dynamic row action maximum likelihood algorithm-reconstructed PET images using [11C]PIB and [18F]THK5351. Eighteen cognitively normal young controls, cognitively normal elderly controls, and patients with probable Alzheimer's disease (n = 6 each), were included. Reduced doses were simulated by randomly sampling half and quarter of the full counts in list mode data for one independent realization at each simulated dose. Bias was evaluated between the reduced dose from the full dose of standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR), distribution volume ratio (DVR) from reference Logan, and non-displaceable binding potential (BPND) from simplified reference tissue model (SRTM). DVR yielded the least bias at low dose compared to SUVR and BPND, and thus, is highly recommended. The dose of [18F]THK5351 and [11C]PIB can be reduced to a quarter of the full dose using DVR for evaluation, whereas the dose can only be reduced to half and a quarter of the full dose for [18F]THK5351 and [11C]PIB using SUVR. BPND showed inconsistent trend and large bias at low dose. The feasibility of dose reduction was dependent on the selected parameters of interest, reconstruction algorithms, reference regions, and to a lesser degree by motion effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer’s disease; Amyloid; Low dose; Positron emission tomography; Tau

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30328073     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-018-0485-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  16 in total

1.  Optimal relaxation parameters of DRAMA (dynamic RAMLA) aiming at one-pass image reconstruction for 3D-PET.

Authors:  Eiichi Tanaka; Hiroyuki Kudo
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  Malignancies with Low Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake at PET/CT: Pitfalls and Prognostic Importance: Resident and Fellow Education Feature.

Authors:  Robert R Flavell; David M Naeger; Carina Mari Aparici; Randall A Hawkins; Miguel H Pampaloni; Spencer C Behr
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest.

Authors:  Rahul S Desikan; Florent Ségonne; Bruce Fischl; Brian T Quinn; Bradford C Dickerson; Deborah Blacker; Randy L Buckner; Anders M Dale; R Paul Maguire; Bradley T Hyman; Marilyn S Albert; Ronald J Killiany
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Self-propagation of pathogenic protein aggregates in neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Mathias Jucker; Lary C Walker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Simplified reference tissue model for PET receptor studies.

Authors:  A A Lammertsma; S P Hume
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Approaches to reducing radiation dose from radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Sharmila Dorbala; Ron Blankstein; Hicham Skali; Mi-Ae Park; Jolene Fantony; Charles Mauceri; James Semer; Stephen C Moore; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Kinetic modeling of amyloid binding in humans using PET imaging and Pittsburgh Compound-B.

Authors:  Julie C Price; William E Klunk; Brian J Lopresti; Xueling Lu; Jessica A Hoge; Scott K Ziolko; Daniel P Holt; Carolyn C Meltzer; Steven T DeKosky; Chester A Mathis
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 8.  Tau imaging: early progress and future directions.

Authors:  Victor L Villemagne; Michelle T Fodero-Tavoletti; Colin L Masters; Christopher C Rowe
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 44.182

9.  Amyloid PET imaging in Alzheimer's disease: a comparison of three radiotracers.

Authors:  S M Landau; B A Thomas; L Thurfjell; M Schmidt; R Margolin; M Mintun; M Pontecorvo; S L Baker; W J Jagust
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Validation of a simplified scatter correction method for 3D brain PET with 15O.

Authors:  Masanobu Ibaraki; Keisuke Matsubara; Kaoru Sato; Tetsuro Mizuta; Toshibumi Kinoshita
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.668

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of the performances of machine learning and deep learning in improving the quality of low dose lung cancer PET images.

Authors:  Ying-Hwey Nai; Hoi Yin Loi; Sophie O'Doherty; Teng Hwee Tan; Anthonin Reilhac
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 2.374

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.