PURPOSE: The increasing use of amyloid PET in Alzheimer's disease research and clinical trials has motivated efforts to standardize methodology. We compared retention of the (11)C radiotracer Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB) and that of two (18)F amyloid radiotracers (florbetapir and flutemetamol) using two study populations. We also examined the feasibility of converting between tracer-specific measures, using PiB as the common link between the two (18)F tracers. METHODS: One group of 40 subjects underwent PiB and flutemetamol imaging sessions and a separate group of 32 subjects underwent PiB and florbetapir imaging sessions. We compared cortical and white matter retention for each (18)F tracer relative to that of PiB, as well as retention in several reference regions and image analysis methods. Correlations between tracer pairs were used to convert tracer-specific threshold values for amyloid positivity between tracers. RESULTS: Cortical retention for each pair of tracers was strongly correlated regardless of reference region (PiB-flutemetamol, ρ = 0.84-0.99; PiB-florbetapir, ρ = 0.83-0.97) and analysis method (ρ = 0.90-0.99). Compared to PiB, flutemetamol had higher white matter retention, while florbetapir had lower cortical retention. Two previously established independent thresholds for amyloid positivity were highly consistent when values were converted between tracer pairs. CONCLUSION: Despite differing white and grey matter retention characteristics, cortical retention for each (18)F tracer was highly correlated with that of PiB, enabling conversion of thresholds across tracer measurement scales with a high level of internal consistency. Standardization of analysis methods and measurement scales may facilitate the comparison of amyloid PET data obtained using different tracers.
PURPOSE: The increasing use of amyloid PET in Alzheimer's disease research and clinical trials has motivated efforts to standardize methodology. We compared retention of the (11)C radiotracer Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB) and that of two (18)F amyloid radiotracers (florbetapir and flutemetamol) using two study populations. We also examined the feasibility of converting between tracer-specific measures, using PiB as the common link between the two (18)F tracers. METHODS: One group of 40 subjects underwent PiB and flutemetamol imaging sessions and a separate group of 32 subjects underwent PiB and florbetapir imaging sessions. We compared cortical and white matter retention for each (18)F tracer relative to that of PiB, as well as retention in several reference regions and image analysis methods. Correlations between tracer pairs were used to convert tracer-specific threshold values for amyloid positivity between tracers. RESULTS:Cortical retention for each pair of tracers was strongly correlated regardless of reference region (PiB-flutemetamol, ρ = 0.84-0.99; PiB-florbetapir, ρ = 0.83-0.97) and analysis method (ρ = 0.90-0.99). Compared to PiB, flutemetamol had higher white matter retention, while florbetapir had lower cortical retention. Two previously established independent thresholds for amyloid positivity were highly consistent when values were converted between tracer pairs. CONCLUSION: Despite differing white and grey matter retention characteristics, cortical retention for each (18)F tracer was highly correlated with that of PiB, enabling conversion of thresholds across tracer measurement scales with a high level of internal consistency. Standardization of analysis methods and measurement scales may facilitate the comparison of amyloid PET data obtained using different tracers.
Authors: Dean F Wong; Paul B Rosenberg; Yun Zhou; Anil Kumar; Vanessa Raymont; Hayden T Ravert; Robert F Dannals; Ayon Nandi; James R Brasić; Weiguo Ye; John Hilton; Constantine Lyketsos; Hank F Kung; Abhinay D Joshi; Daniel M Skovronsky; Michael J Pontecorvo Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Anton Forsberg; Henry Engler; Ove Almkvist; Gunnar Blomquist; Göran Hagman; Anders Wall; Anna Ringheim; Bengt Långström; Agneta Nordberg Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2007-05-11 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Rik Vandenberghe; Koen Van Laere; Adrian Ivanoiu; Eric Salmon; Christine Bastin; Eric Triau; Steen Hasselbalch; Ian Law; Allan Andersen; Alex Korner; Lennart Minthon; Gaëtan Garraux; Natalie Nelissen; Guy Bormans; Chris Buckley; Rikard Owenius; Lennart Thurfjell; Gill Farrar; David J Brooks Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Abhinay D Joshi; Michael J Pontecorvo; Chrisopher M Clark; Alan P Carpenter; Danna L Jennings; Carl H Sadowsky; Lee P Adler; Karel D Kovnat; John P Seibyl; Anupa Arora; Krishnendu Saha; Jason D Burns; Mark J Lowrey; Mark A Mintun; Daniel M Skovronsky Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2012-02-13 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Benjamin A Thomas; Kjell Erlandsson; Marc Modat; Lennart Thurfjell; Rik Vandenberghe; Sebastien Ourselin; Brian F Hutton Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-02-19 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Zsolt Cselényi; Maria Eriksdotter Jönhagen; Anton Forsberg; Christer Halldin; Per Julin; Magnus Schou; Peter Johnström; Katarina Varnäs; Samuel Svensson; Lars Farde Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2012-02-09 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Nelleke Tolboom; Maqsood Yaqub; Ronald Boellaard; Gert Luurtsema; Albert D Windhorst; Philip Scheltens; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Bart N M van Berckel Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-04-22 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Natalie Nelissen; Koen Van Laere; Lennart Thurfjell; Rikard Owenius; Mathieu Vandenbulcke; Michel Koole; Guy Bormans; David J Brooks; Rik Vandenberghe Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2009-07-17 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: W J Jagust; S M Landau; L M Shaw; J Q Trojanowski; R A Koeppe; E M Reiman; N L Foster; R C Petersen; M W Weiner; J C Price; C A Mathis Journal: Neurology Date: 2009-10-13 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Michelle T Fodero-Tavoletti; Christopher C Rowe; Catriona A McLean; Laura Leone; Qiao-Xin Li; Colin L Masters; Roberto Cappai; Victor L Villemagne Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2009-01-21 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Jordi A Matías-Guiu; María Nieves Cabrera-Martín; Teresa Moreno-Ramos; María Valles-Salgado; Marta Fernandez-Matarrubia; José Luis Carreras; Jorge Matías-Guiu Journal: J Neurol Date: 2015-04-11 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Katherine J Bangen; Alexandra J Weigand; Kelsey R Thomas; Lisa Delano-Wood; Lindsay R Clark; Joel Eppig; Madeleine L Werhane; Emily C Edmonds; Mark W Bondi Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2019-03-21 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Michael J Properzi; Rachel F Buckley; Jasmeer P Chhatwal; Michael C Donohue; Cristina Lois; Elizabeth C Mormino; Keith A Johnson; Reisa A Sperling; Aaron P Schultz Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2018-11-17 Impact factor: 6.556