Literature DB >> 30326011

Association of Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy Before Menopause Onset With Medial Temporal Lobe Neurodegeneration.

Burcu Zeydan1,2, Nirubol Tosakulwong3, Christopher G Schwarz1, Matthew L Senjem1,4, Jeffrey L Gunter1,4, Robert I Reid4, Liliana Gazzuola Rocca5, Timothy G Lesnick3, Carin Y Smith3, Kent R Bailey3, Val J Lowe1, Rosebud O Roberts2,5, Clifford R Jack1, Ronald C Petersen2, Virginia M Miller6,7, Michelle M Mielke2,5, Walter A Rocca2,5, Kejal Kantarci1.   

Abstract

Importance: There is an increased risk of cognitive impairment or dementia in women who undergo bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) before menopause. However, data are lacking on the association of BSO before menopause with imaging biomarkers that indicate medial temporal lobe neurodegeneration and Alzheimer disease pathophysiology. Objective: To investigate medial temporal lobe structure, white matter lesion load, and β-amyloid deposition in women who underwent BSO before age 50 years and before reaching natural menopause. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nested case-control study of women in the population-based Mayo Clinic Cohort Study of Oophorectomy and Aging-2 (MOA-2) and in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) in Olmsted County, Minnesota, included women who underwent BSO from 1988 through 2007 and a control group from the intersection of the 2 cohorts. Women who underwent BSO and control participants who underwent a neuropsychological evaluation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and Pittsburgh compound B positron emission tomography (PiB-PET) were included in the analysis. Data analysis was performed from November 2017 to August 2018. Exposure: Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in premenopausal women who were younger than 50 years. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cortical β-amyloid deposition on PiB-PET scan was calculated using the standard uptake value ratio. White matter hyperintensity volume and biomarkers for medial temporal lobe neurodegeneration (eg, amygdala volume, hippocampal volume, and parahippocampal-entorhinal cortical thickness) on structural MRI and entorhinal white matter fractional anisotropy on diffusion tensor MRI were also measured.
Results: Forty-one women who underwent BSO and 49 control participants were recruited. One woman was excluded from the BSO group after diagnosis of an ovarian malignant condition, and 6 women were excluded from the control group after undergoing BSO after enrollment. Twenty control participants and 23 women who had undergone BSO completed all examinations. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age at imaging was 65 (62-68) years in the BSO group and 63 (60-66) years in the control group. Amygdala volume was smaller in the BSO group (median [IQR], 1.74 [1.59-1.91] cm3) than the control group (2.15 [2.05-2.37] cm3; P < .001). The parahippocampal-entorhinal cortex was thinner in the BSO group (median [IQR], 3.91 [3.64-4.00] mm) than the control group (3.97 [3.89-4.28] mm; P = .046). Entorhinal white matter fractional anisotropy was lower in the BSO group (median [IQR], 0.19 [0.18-0.22]) than the control group (0.22 [0.20-0.23]; P = .03). Women were treated with estrogen in both groups (BSO, n = 22 of 23 [96%]; control, n = 10 of 19 [53%]). Global cognitive status test results did not differ between the groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Abrupt hormonal changes associated with BSO in premenopausal women may lead to medial temporal lobe structural abnormalities later in life. Longitudinal evaluation is needed to determine whether cognitive decline follows.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30326011      PMCID: PMC6439881          DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Neurol        ISSN: 2168-6149            Impact factor:   18.302


Introduction

Women who undergo bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) before the onset of menopause have an accelerated accumulation of multimorbidity, with an increased risk of aging-associated neurological diseases, including dementia.[1,2,3] Furthermore, surgical menopause at an early age was associated with Alzheimer disease (AD) pathology at autopsy.[4] Because imaging biomarkers associated with cognitive impairment and dementia precede the clinical symptoms, and may provide insight into the underlying causative mechanisms of cognitive impairment and dementia later in life, we investigated β-amyloid deposition (primary outcome), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–based biomarkers of medial temporal lobe neurodegeneration, and white matter hyperintensity volume in women who underwent BSO before age 50 years and before reaching natural menopause.

Methods

The Mayo Clinic Cohort Study of Oophorectomy and Aging-2 (MOA-2) is a population-based cohort study that includes women who underwent BSO before age 50 years and before reaching natural menopause from 1988 through 2007 and an age-matched control group who had not undergone bilateral oophorectomy before age 50 years.[5] The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) is another population-based cohort study, which includes participants with normal cognitive aging, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia.[6] All MCSA participants are invited to undergo MRI and Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) positron emission tomography (PET). Both study cohorts are representative of the geographically defined population of Olmsted County, Minnesota. In the current study, women with BSO and control-participant women from the MOA-2 cohort who later were enrolled in the MCSA and underwent a neuropsychological evaluation, MRI, and PiB-PET scan were included (Figure 1). This study was approved by the Mayo Clinic institutional review board, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Figure 1.

Study Sample

BSO indicates bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; MCSA, Mayo Clinic Study of Aging; MOA-2, Mayo Clinic Cohort Study of Oophorectomy and Aging-2; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PET, positron emission tomography; PiB, Pittsburgh compound B.

Study Sample

BSO indicates bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; MCSA, Mayo Clinic Study of Aging; MOA-2, Mayo Clinic Cohort Study of Oophorectomy and Aging-2; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PET, positron emission tomography; PiB, Pittsburgh compound B. Global cognitive status was assessed using the short test of mental status, and combining 9 tests into a global cognitive status score.[6] The MRI studies were performed at 3-T (GE Healthcare). Previously described and validated MRI analysis methods were used.[7,8] Hippocampal and amygdala volumes were adjusted for total intracranial volume. Parahippocampal-entorhinal cortical thickness was measured using FreeSurfer version 5.3 (Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging at Massachusetts General Hospital).[9] A semi-automated segmentation[10] of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images was used for white matter hyperintensity volume quantification and adjusted for total intracranial volume. Cerebral infarcts were also evaluated. Previously described and validated methods were used to process diffusion tensor imaging scans.[11] Entorhinal white matter fractional anisotropy, which includes the perforant pathway, was quantified using the Johns Hopkins University atlas.[12] A PET and computed tomography scanner with 3-dimensional mode (GE Healthcare) was used for PET imaging, and image analysis was performed using an automated image processing pipeline.[8] Cortical β-amyloid deposition on PiB-PET scan was calculated using standard uptake value ratio.

Statistical Analysis

Wilcoxon rank sum tests, rank regression tests adjusted for total intracranial volume, and Fisher exact tests were used for comparisons of the BSO and control groups. Correlations between imaging biomarkers and global cognitive status scores were assessed using Spearman correlations, and the P values were adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false-discovery rate. Statistical significance was considered at the 2-sided α level of .05.

Results

A total of 43 women fulfilled the inclusion criteria, including 23 who had undergone BSO and 20 control participants. The median age at oophorectomy in the BSO group was 46 (interquartile range [IQR], 45-48) years. Age at imaging and frequency of APOE ε4 carriers did not differ between the groups. Among the 23 women who underwent BSO with hysterectomy, 22 (96%) took unopposed estrogen for a median duration of 10 (IQR, 5-13) years after surgery. Oral conjugated equine estrogen was the most common type used (n = 15 of 22 [68%]), typically at a dosage of 0.625 mg/d. Among the 20 control-participant women, 19 (95%) reached menopause during the study follow-up, 17 (85%) had natural menopause, and 10 of 19 (53%) took estrogen for a median duration of 10 (IQR, 6-16) years. The most common type used was oral conjugated equine estrogen at a dosage of 0.625 mg/d (n = 9 of 10 [90%]) with progestin (oral medroxyprogesterone acetate at 2.5 mg/d; n = 8 of 19 [42%]) for a median duration of 9 (IQR, 4-13) years. Although the frequency of mild cognitive impairment diagnosis was slightly higher in the BSO group (n = 3 [13%]) compared with the control group (n = 1 [5%]; P = .40), the short test of mental status, global cognitive status scores, and the Beck depression and anxiety inventory scores did not differ between the groups (Table).
Table.

Demographics, Global Cognitive Status, and Imaging Characteristics of the Study Sample

CharacteristicNo. (%)P Value
Bilateral Salpingo-oophorectomy (n = 23)Control Group (n = 20)
Demographic and clinical characteristic
Age at oophorectomy, median (IQR), y46 (45-48)NANA
Time from oophorectomy to imaging, median (IQR), y19 (17-22)NANA
Age at imaging, median (IQR), y65 (62-68)63 (60-66).23
Length of Olmsted County residence at the time of MCSA baseline, median (IQR), y41 (34-44)36 (34-41).56
Women who reached menopause23 (100)19 (95).47
Hormone therapy with estrogenb22 (96)10 (53).002
Estrogen therapy, median (IQR), yc10 (5-13)10 (6-16).76
Oral conjugated equine estrogenc15 (68)9 (90).38
Hormone therapy with progestinbNA8 (42)NA
Progestin therapy, median (IQR), ydNA9 (4-13)NA
Oral medroxyprogesterone acetatedNA8 (100)NA
BMI, median (IQR)30 (27-34)29 (25-31).22
Smokinge5 (36)9 (56).30
Education, median (IQR), y14 (13-16)16 (13-18).62
APOE ε4 carriers2 (9)4 (20).40
Neuropsychological evaluation scores
Short test of mental status, median (IQR)37 (35-37)37 (35-38).20
z Scores, median (IQR)
Global1.51 (0.85-1.99)1.59 (0.99-1.91).78
Memory1.57 (0.62-2.09)1.53 (1.00-1.89).73
Attention1.43 (0.96-1.77)1.37 (0.88-1.73).79
Language1.05 (0.17-1.34)1.01 (0.73-1.52).58
Visuospatial0.73 (0.14-1.40)1.19 (0.84-1.48).28
Mild cognitive impairment3 (13)1 (5).40
Beck Depression Inventory score, median (IQR)4 (1-6)4 (2-7).52
Beck Anxiety Inventory score, median (IQR)1 (0-4)0 (0-3).28
Neuroimaging biomarker measurements, median (IQR)
White matter hyperintensity, cm35.46 (2.87-8.11)4.13 (2.98-9.98).52
Hippocampal volume, scoref−0.32 (−0.80 to 0.29)−0.05 (−0.29 to 0.30).13
Amygdala volume, cm31.74 (1.59-1.91)2.15 (2.05-2.37)<.001
Parahippocampal-entorhinal cortical thickness, mm3.91 (3.64-4.00)3.97 (3.89-4.28).046
Entorhinal white matter fractional anisotropy0.19 (0.18-0.22)0.22 (0.20-0.23).03
Global cortical Pittsburgh compound B standard uptake value ratio1.29 (1.24-1.35)1.25 (1.19-1.31).17
Infarctions1 (4)1 (5)>.99

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared); IQR, interquartile range; MCSA, Mayo Clinic Study of Aging; NA, not applicable.

Wilcoxon rank sum tests, rank regression tests adjusted for total intracranial volume, and Fisher exact tests were used to compare the bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and control groups.

In 23 women who had undergone bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and 19 control participants who reached menopause.

In 22 women who had undergone bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and in 10 control participants who used hormone therapy with estrogen; the typical dosage was 0.625 mg/d.

In 8 control participants who used hormone therapy with progestin; the typical dosage was 2.5 mg/d.

In 14 women who had undergone bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and in 16 control participants with known smoking status.

Hippocampal volume was calculated as raw right plus left hippocampal volumes, adjusted for total intracranial volume. To derive the total intracranial volume–adjusted hippocampal volume, we fit a linear regression model among 133 participants with normal cognitive function aged 30 to 59 years to predict hippocampal volume from total intracranial volume.[13]

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared); IQR, interquartile range; MCSA, Mayo Clinic Study of Aging; NA, not applicable. Wilcoxon rank sum tests, rank regression tests adjusted for total intracranial volume, and Fisher exact tests were used to compare the bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and control groups. In 23 women who had undergone bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and 19 control participants who reached menopause. In 22 women who had undergone bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and in 10 control participants who used hormone therapy with estrogen; the typical dosage was 0.625 mg/d. In 8 control participants who used hormone therapy with progestin; the typical dosage was 2.5 mg/d. In 14 women who had undergone bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and in 16 control participants with known smoking status. Hippocampal volume was calculated as raw right plus left hippocampal volumes, adjusted for total intracranial volume. To derive the total intracranial volume–adjusted hippocampal volume, we fit a linear regression model among 133 participants with normal cognitive function aged 30 to 59 years to predict hippocampal volume from total intracranial volume.[13] On structural MRI, median (IQR) amygdala volume was smaller (BSO group, 1.74 [1.59-1.91] cm3; control group: 2.15 [2.05-2.37] cm3; P < .001), median (IQR) parahippocampal-entorhinal cortex was thinner (BSO group: 3.91 [3.64-4.00] mm; control group: 3.97 [3.89-4.28] mm; P = .046), and the entorhinal white matter fractional anisotropy on diffusion tensor imaging was lower (BSO group: 0.19 [0.18-0.22]; control group: 0.22 [0.20-0.23]; P = .03) in the BSO group compared with the control group (Table). Smaller hippocampal volume on MRI and higher cortical PiB standard uptake value ratio on PiB-PET scan were observed in the BSO group compared with the control group, but these results did not reach statistical significance (Figure 2). The results did not change noticeably in sensitivity analyses that added 4 women who had an MRI but not a PiB-PET scan, and in sensitivity analyses that removed 4 women who had mild cognitive impairment at the time of imaging testing (data not shown).
Figure 2.

Imaging Characteristics in Women Who Underwent Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy (BSO) vs Control Participants

Box plots show median and interquartile ranges. Amygdala volume was smaller and parahippocampal-entorhinal cortex was thinner on structural magnetic resonance imaging, and entorhinal white matter fractional anisotrophy was lower on diffusion tensor imaging in women who had undergone BSO than in control participants. Hippocampal volume was calculated as raw right plus left hippocampal volumes, adjusted for total intracranial volume. To derive the total intracranial volume–adjusted hippocampal volume, we fit a linear regression model among 133 participants with normal cognitive function aged 30 to 59 years to predict hippocampal volume from total intracranial volume.[13] There were no statistically significant differences in hippocampal volume, cortical Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) standard uptake value ratio, or white matter hyperintensity volume between women who had undergone BSO and control participants.

Imaging Characteristics in Women Who Underwent Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy (BSO) vs Control Participants

Box plots show median and interquartile ranges. Amygdala volume was smaller and parahippocampal-entorhinal cortex was thinner on structural magnetic resonance imaging, and entorhinal white matter fractional anisotrophy was lower on diffusion tensor imaging in women who had undergone BSO than in control participants. Hippocampal volume was calculated as raw right plus left hippocampal volumes, adjusted for total intracranial volume. To derive the total intracranial volume–adjusted hippocampal volume, we fit a linear regression model among 133 participants with normal cognitive function aged 30 to 59 years to predict hippocampal volume from total intracranial volume.[13] There were no statistically significant differences in hippocampal volume, cortical Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) standard uptake value ratio, or white matter hyperintensity volume between women who had undergone BSO and control participants. White matter hyperintensity volume and the frequency of infarctions did not differ between the groups. Imaging biomarkers were not associated with the global cognitive status score, and Beck Anxiety Inventory and Beck Depression Inventory scores after correcting for multiple comparisons using false-discovery rate.

Discussion

In this study, women who underwent BSO before age 50 years and before reaching natural menopause had smaller amygdala volumes, thinner parahippocampal-entorhinal cortices, and lower entorhinal white matter fractional anisotropy values compared with control-participant women. There is an increased risk of cognitive impairment or dementia[1] and presence of AD pathology[4] in women who undergo BSO before menopause. However, imaging biomarkers associated with AD pathophysiology that precede cognitive impairment have not been studied in these women. Results of the present study suggest that women who underwent early BSO have biomarker abnormalities associated with neurodegeneration in the medial temporal lobe. In particular, the entorhinal cortex, which is one of the regions involved with neurofibrillary tangle pathology during the preclinical stages of AD, as well as primary age-associated taupathy.[14] In addition, a thinner entorhinal cortex and lower fractional anisotropy on diffusion tensor imaging in the BSO group suggest a disruption in the entorhinal white matter microstructure that includes the perforant pathway carrying the connections between the entorhinal cortex and the hippocampus. Although not statistically significant in this small explorative sample, a difference in hippocampal volumes and cortical PiB uptake in the BSO group compared with the control group suggests the occurrence of early biomarker changes associated with AD pathophysiology. Premenopausal oophorectomy–induced estrogen deficiency is thought to be the primary cause of the increased risk of cognitive impairment or dementia in women with BSO before the onset of menopause.[1] Furthermore, AD biomarker abnormalities have been observed more frequently in women undergoing menopause compared with premenopausal women, after controlling for age.[15] In our study, 96% of the women with BSO were treated with estrogen (primarily oral conjugated equine estrogen), for a median of 10 years after BSO; however, this type and duration of hormonal treatment after BSO does not seem to be sufficient to prevent structural changes in the medial temporal lobe later in life. Further research into the type of estrogen treatments used, route of administration, dosing, and influence of the other ovarian hormones and hormones of the pituitary-ovarian axis is needed.

Limitations

Lower hippocampal volume and higher cortical β-amyloid accumulation observed in the BSO group compared with the control group may have failed to reach statistical significance because of the small sample size. Because structural imaging biomarkers of medial temporal lobe neurodegeneration are associated with cognitive impairment and dementia later in life,[16] findings of the current study support the association between BSO in premenopausal women and an increased risk of cognitive decline and dementia.[1,4]

Conclusions

Abrupt hormonal changes because of BSO in premenopausal women may lead to medial temporal lobe structural abnormalities later in life. Because alterations in structural imaging biomarkers of neurodegeneration in the medial temporal lobe precede clinical symptoms of dementia, enlargement and longitudinal follow-up of this cohort is needed.
  16 in total

1.  Qualitative estimates of medial temporal atrophy as a predictor of progression from mild cognitive impairment to dementia.

Authors:  Charles DeCarli; Giovanni B Frisoni; Christopher M Clark; Danielle Harvey; Michael Grundman; Ronald C Petersen; Leon J Thal; Shelia Jin; Clifford R Jack; Philip Scheltens
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2007-01

2.  Age at surgical menopause influences cognitive decline and Alzheimer pathology in older women.

Authors:  Riley Bove; Elizabeth Secor; Lori B Chibnik; Lisa L Barnes; Julie A Schneider; David A Bennett; Philip L De Jager
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy and long-term health outcomes in the nurses' health study.

Authors:  William H Parker; Michael S Broder; Eunice Chang; Diane Feskanich; Cindy Farquhar; Zhimae Liu; Donna Shoupe; Jonathan S Berek; Susan Hankinson; JoAnn E Manson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Thrombogenic microvesicles and white matter hyperintensities in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Limor Raz; M Jayachandran; Nirubol Tosakulwong; Timothy G Lesnick; Samantha M Wille; Matthew C Murphy; Matthew L Senjem; Jeffrey L Gunter; Prashanthi Vemuri; Clifford R Jack; Virginia M Miller; Kejal Kantarci
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  11C PiB and structural MRI provide complementary information in imaging of Alzheimer's disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Clifford R Jack; Val J Lowe; Matthew L Senjem; Stephen D Weigand; Bradley J Kemp; Maria M Shiung; David S Knopman; Bradley F Boeve; William E Klunk; Chester A Mathis; Ronald C Petersen
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging: design and sampling, participation, baseline measures and sample characteristics.

Authors:  Rosebud O Roberts; Yonas E Geda; David S Knopman; Ruth H Cha; V Shane Pankratz; Bradley F Boeve; Robert J Ivnik; Eric G Tangalos; Ronald C Petersen; Walter A Rocca
Journal:  Neuroepidemiology       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Primary age-related tauopathy (PART): a common pathology associated with human aging.

Authors:  John F Crary; John Q Trojanowski; Julie A Schneider; Jose F Abisambra; Erin L Abner; Irina Alafuzoff; Steven E Arnold; Johannes Attems; Thomas G Beach; Eileen H Bigio; Nigel J Cairns; Dennis W Dickson; Marla Gearing; Lea T Grinberg; Patrick R Hof; Bradley T Hyman; Kurt Jellinger; Gregory A Jicha; Gabor G Kovacs; David S Knopman; Julia Kofler; Walter A Kukull; Ian R Mackenzie; Eliezer Masliah; Ann McKee; Thomas J Montine; Melissa E Murray; Janna H Neltner; Ismael Santa-Maria; William W Seeley; Alberto Serrano-Pozo; Michael L Shelanski; Thor Stein; Masaki Takao; Dietmar R Thal; Jonathan B Toledo; Juan C Troncoso; Jean Paul Vonsattel; Charles L White; Thomas Wisniewski; Randall L Woltjer; Masahito Yamada; Peter T Nelson
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 17.088

8.  A large-scale comparison of cortical thickness and volume methods for measuring Alzheimer's disease severity.

Authors:  Christopher G Schwarz; Jeffrey L Gunter; Heather J Wiste; Scott A Przybelski; Stephen D Weigand; Chadwick P Ward; Matthew L Senjem; Prashanthi Vemuri; Melissa E Murray; Dennis W Dickson; Joseph E Parisi; Kejal Kantarci; Michael W Weiner; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 4.881

9.  Cohort profile: the Mayo Clinic Cohort Study of Oophorectomy and Aging-2 (MOA-2) in Olmsted County, Minnesota (USA).

Authors:  Walter A Rocca; Liliana Gazzuola Rocca; Carin Y Smith; Brandon R Grossardt; Stephanie S Faubion; Lynne T Shuster; Elizabeth A Stewart; Michelle M Mielke; Kejal Kantarci; Virginia M Miller
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Improved DTI registration allows voxel-based analysis that outperforms tract-based spatial statistics.

Authors:  Christopher G Schwarz; Robert I Reid; Jeffrey L Gunter; Matthew L Senjem; Scott A Przybelski; Samantha M Zuk; Jennifer L Whitwell; Prashanthi Vemuri; Keith A Josephs; Kejal Kantarci; Paul M Thompson; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  20 in total

1.  1H MR spectroscopy biomarkers of neuronal and synaptic function are associated with tau deposition in cognitively unimpaired older adults.

Authors:  Firat Kara; James M Joers; Dinesh K Deelchand; Young Woo Park; Scott A Przybelski; Timothy G Lesnick; Matthew L Senjem; Burcu Zeydan; David S Knopman; Val J Lowe; Prashanthi Vemuri; Michelle M Mielke; Mary M Machulda; Clifford R Jack; Ronald C Petersen; Gülin Öz; Kejal Kantarci
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 2.  A tale of two systems: Lessons learned from female mid-life aging with implications for Alzheimer's prevention & treatment.

Authors:  Aarti Mishra; Yiwei Wang; Fei Yin; Francesca Vitali; Kathleen E Rodgers; Maira Soto; Lisa Mosconi; Tian Wang; Roberta D Brinton
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 10.895

3.  Association of Reproductive History With Brain MRI Biomarkers of Dementia Risk in Midlife.

Authors:  Eva Schelbaum; Lacey Loughlin; Steven Jett; Cenai Zhang; Grace Jang; Niharika Malviya; Hollie Hristov; Silky Pahlajani; Richard Isaacson; Jonathan P Dyke; Hooman Kamel; Roberta Diaz Brinton; Lisa Mosconi
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 4.  Ovarian steroid hormones: A long overlooked but critical contributor to brain aging and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Steven Jett; Eva Schelbaum; Grace Jang; Camila Boneu Yepez; Jonathan P Dyke; Silky Pahlajani; Roberta Diaz Brinton; Lisa Mosconi
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 5.702

5.  Multimodal MRI examination of structural and functional brain changes in older women with breast cancer in the first year of antiestrogen hormonal therapy.

Authors:  Brenna C McDonald; Kathleen Van Dyk; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Andrew J Saykin; Rachael L Deardorff; Jessica N Bailey; Wanting Zhai; Judith E Carroll; James C Root; Tim A Ahles
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 4.624

6.  Long-term ovarian hormone deprivation alters functional connectivity, brain neurochemical profile and white matter integrity in the Tg2576 amyloid mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Firat Kara; Michael E Belloy; Rick Voncken; Zahra Sarwari; Yadav Garima; Cynthia Anckaerts; An Langbeen; Valerie Leysen; Disha Shah; Jules Jacobs; Julie Hamaide; Peter Bols; Johan Van Audekerke; Jasmijn Daans; Caroline Guglielmetti; Kejal Kantarci; Vincent Prevot; Steffen Roßner; Peter Ponsaerts; Annemie Van der Linden; Marleen Verhoye
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 7.  Precision hormone therapy: identification of positive responders.

Authors:  Y J Kim; R D Brinton
Journal:  Climacteric       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.005

Review 8.  The scientific body of knowledge - Whose body does it serve? A spotlight on oral contraceptives and women's health factors in neuroimaging.

Authors:  Caitlin M Taylor; Laura Pritschet; Emily G Jacobs
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 8.606

9.  Menopause impacts human brain structure, connectivity, energy metabolism, and amyloid-beta deposition.

Authors:  Lisa Mosconi; Valentina Berti; Jonathan Dyke; Eva Schelbaum; Steven Jett; Lacey Loughlin; Grace Jang; Aneela Rahman; Hollie Hristov; Silky Pahlajani; Randolph Andrews; Dawn Matthews; Orli Etingin; Christine Ganzer; Mony de Leon; Richard Isaacson; Roberta Diaz Brinton
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  A Lifecourse Perspective on Female Sex-Specific Risk Factors for Later Life Cognition.

Authors:  Amalia Peterson; Sarah E Tom
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 6.030

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.