Literature DB >> 30325982

Five-Year Risk of Cervical Precancer Following p16/Ki-67 Dual-Stain Triage of HPV-Positive Women.

Megan A Clarke1, Li C Cheung1, Philip E Castle2, Mark Schiffman1, Diane Tokugawa3, Nancy Poitras3, Thomas Lorey3, Walter Kinney4, Nicolas Wentzensen1.   

Abstract

Importance: As cervical cancer screening transitions to primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, effective triage and management of HPV-positive women is critical to avoid unnecessary colposcopy referral and associated harms while maintaining high sensitivity for cervical precancer. Triage with p16/Ki-67 dual-stain (DS) testing has shown high sensitivity and specificity for detection of cervical precancers; however, longitudinal studies are needed to determine the long-term risk of precancer following a negative DS result. Objective: To evaluate the longitudinal performance of p16/Ki-67 DS triage for detection of cervical precancer in HPV-positive women over 5 years of follow-up in the context of clinical management thresholds. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prospective cohort study of HPV-positive women 30 years or older undergoing routine cervical cancer screening in 2012 with HPV and Papanicolaou (hereinafter "cytology") co-testing within the Kaiser Permanente Northern California health care system. Follow-up of medical records was conducted through 2017. Exposures: All p16/Ki-67 DS testing was performed on residual SurePath material, and slides were evaluated for p16/Ki-67 positivity. Main Outcomes and Measures: Histological end points were ascertained from the clinical database through 2017. We estimated 5-year cumulative risks of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades of 2 or worse (≥CIN2) or grades 3 or worse (≥CIN3) by baseline DS and cytology at yearly intervals using Logistic Weibull models. Risks were compared with clinical management thresholds for colposcopy referral and a 1-year return interval.
Results: Among the 1549 HPV-positive women in this study, the mean age at enrollment was 42.2 years, and the median follow-up time was 3.7 years (range, 0.2-5.4 years). Positive DS results were associated with significantly higher cumulative 5-year risks of ≥CIN2 compared with abnormal cytology (31.0%; 95% CI, 27.2%-35.3% vs 25.0%; 95% CI, 21.7%-28.7%; P = .03). Women with DS-negative findings had significantly lower 5-year risks of ≥CIN2 compared with women with normal cytology (8.5%; 95% CI, 6.5%-11.1% vs 12.3%; 95% CI, 9.8%-15.4%; P = .04). In DS-negative women, the risks of both ≥CIN2 and ≥CIN3 remained below the colposcopy referral threshold for all 5 years, crossing the 1-year return threshold at 3 years. Conclusions and Relevance: Triage with p16/Ki-67 DS provides better long-term risk stratification than cytology over 5 years. The low risk of cervical precancer in p16/Ki-67 DS-negative women permits safe extension of follow-up intervals for 3 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30325982      PMCID: PMC6439556          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   31.777


  19 in total

1.  [The p16INK4a protein: a cytological marker for detecting high grade intraepithelial neoplasia of the uterine cervix].

Authors:  Christine Bergeron; Nicolas Wentzensen; Frederic Cas; Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz
Journal:  Ann Pathol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.407

2.  Triaging HPV-positive women with p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology: Results from a sub-study nested into the ATHENA trial.

Authors:  Thomas C Wright; Catherine M Behrens; James Ranger-Moore; Susanne Rehm; Abha Sharma; Mark H Stoler; Ruediger Ridder
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 3.  Eurogin 2016 Roadmap: how HPV knowledge is changing screening practice.

Authors:  Nicolas Wentzensen; Marc Arbyn; Johannes Berkhof; Mark Bower; Karen Canfell; Mark Einstein; Christopher Farley; Joseph Monsonego; Silvia Franceschi
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 4.  Eurogin roadmap 2017: Triage strategies for the management of HPV-positive women in cervical screening programs.

Authors:  Kate Cuschieri; Guglielmo Ronco; Attila Lorincz; Laurie Smith; Gina Ogilvie; Lisa Mirabello; Francesca Carozzi; Heather Cubie; Nicolas Wentzensen; Peter Snijders; Marc Arbyn; Joe Monsonego; Silvia Franceschi
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Challenges in risk estimation using routinely collected clinical data: The example of estimating cervical cancer risks from electronic health-records.

Authors:  Rebecca Landy; Li C Cheung; Mark Schiffman; Julia C Gage; Noorie Hyun; Nicolas Wentzensen; Walter K Kinney; Philip E Castle; Barbara Fetterman; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Peter D Sasieni; Hormuzd A Katki
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Triaging Pap cytology negative, HPV positive cervical cancer screening results with p16/Ki-67 Dual-stained cytology.

Authors:  K Ulrich Petry; Dietmar Schmidt; Sarah Scherbring; Alexander Luyten; Axel Reinecke-Lüthge; Christine Bergeron; Friedrich Kommoss; Thomas Löning; Jaume Ordi; Sigrid Regauer; Ruediger Ridder
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Performance of p16/Ki-67 immunostaining to detect cervical cancer precursors in a colposcopy referral population.

Authors:  Nicolas Wentzensen; Lauren Schwartz; Rosemary E Zuna; Katie Smith; Cara Mathews; Michael A Gold; R Andy Allen; Roy Zhang; S Terence Dunn; Joan L Walker; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Triage of HPV positive women in cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Nicolas Wentzensen; Mark Schiffman; Timothy Palmer; Marc Arbyn
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 3.168

9.  Risk of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during follow-up in HPV-positive women according to baseline p16-INK4A results: a prospective analysis of a nested substudy of the NTCC randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Francesca Carozzi; Anna Gillio-Tos; Massimo Confortini; Annarosa Del Mistro; Cristina Sani; Laura De Marco; Salvatore Girlando; Stefano Rosso; Carlo Naldoni; Paolo Dalla Palma; Manuel Zorzi; Paolo Giorgi-Rossi; Nereo Segnan; Jack Cuzick; Guglielmo Ronco
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  A virtual microscopy system to scan, evaluate and archive biomarker enhanced cervical cytology slides.

Authors:  Niels Grabe; Bernd Lahrmann; Thora Pommerencke; Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz; Miriam Reuschenbach; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  Cell Oncol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.730

View more
  17 in total

1.  Multistate models for the natural history of cancer progression.

Authors:  Li C Cheung; Paul S Albert; Shrutikona Das; Richard J Cook
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 9.075

Review 2.  False Negative Results in Cervical Cancer Screening-Risks, Reasons and Implications for Clinical Practice and Public Health.

Authors:  Anna Macios; Andrzej Nowakowski
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-20

3.  The Improving Risk Informed HPV Screening (IRIS) Study: Design and Baseline Characteristics.

Authors:  Julia C Gage; Tina Raine-Bennett; Mark Schiffman; Megan A Clarke; Li C Cheung; Nancy E Poitras; Nicole E Varnado; Hormuzd A Katki; Philip E Castle; Brian Befano; Malini Chandra; Greg Rydzak; Thomas Lorey; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.090

4.  Comparison of CINtec PLUS cytology and cobas HPV test for triaging Canadian patients with LSIL cytology referred to colposcopy: A two-year prospective study.

Authors:  Laura Gilbert; Sam Ratnam; Dan Jang; Reza Alaghehbandan; Miranda Schell; Rob Needle; Anne Ecobichon-Morris; Arnav Wadhawan; Dustin Costescu; Laurie Elit; Peter Wang; George Zahariadis; Max Chernesky
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 5.  Meta-analysis of downregulated E-cadherin as a diagnostic biomarker for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoxia Ma; An Ge; Jie Han; Jin Kang; Yating Zhang; Xiaohong Liu; Li Xing; Xiaochun Liu; Li Dong
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Clinical Evaluation of Human Papillomavirus Screening With p16/Ki-67 Dual Stain Triage in a Large Organized Cervical Cancer Screening Program.

Authors:  Nicolas Wentzensen; Megan A Clarke; Renee Bremer; Nancy Poitras; Diane Tokugawa; Patricia E Goldhoff; Philip E Castle; Mark Schiffman; Julie D Kingery; Kiranjit K Grewal; Alex Locke; Walter Kinney; Thomas S Lorey
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  STRIDES - STudying Risk to Improve DisparitiES in Cervical Cancer in Mississippi - Design and baseline results of a Statewide Cohort Study.

Authors:  Carolann Risley; Mary W Stewart; Kim R Geisinger; Laree M Hiser; Jody C Morgan; Kenyata J Owens; Krishna Ayyalasomayajula; Rhonda M Rives; Ashish Jannela; Dianne E Grunes; Lei Zhang; Mark Schiffman; Nicolas Wentzensen; Megan A Clarke
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  p16/ki67 and E6/E7 mRNA Accuracy and Prognostic Value in Triaging HPV DNA-Positive Women.

Authors:  Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Francesca Carozzi; Guglielmo Ronco; Elena Allia; Simonetta Bisanzi; Anna Gillio-Tos; Laura De Marco; Raffaella Rizzolo; Daniela Gustinucci; Annarosa Del Mistro; Helena Frayle; Massimo Confortini; Anna Iossa; Elena Cesarini; Simonetta Bulletti; Basilio Passamonti; Silvia Gori; Laura Toniolo; Alessandra Barca; Laura Bonvicini; Pamela Mancuso; Francesco Venturelli; Maria Benevolo
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines: Methods for Risk Estimation, Recommended Management, and Validation.

Authors:  Li C Cheung; Didem Egemen; Xiaojian Chen; Hormuzd A Katki; Maria Demarco; Amy L Wiser; Rebecca B Perkins; Richard S Guido; Nicolas Wentzensen; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.842

10.  Reporting and Assessing the Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies for Cervical Cancer Screening and Management.

Authors:  Megan A Clarke; Teresa M Darragh; Erin Nelson; Elizabeth R Unger; Rosemary Zuna; Miriam Cremer; Colleen K Stockdale; Mark H Einstein; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.842

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.