Literature DB >> 21420158

Triaging Pap cytology negative, HPV positive cervical cancer screening results with p16/Ki-67 Dual-stained cytology.

K Ulrich Petry1, Dietmar Schmidt, Sarah Scherbring, Alexander Luyten, Axel Reinecke-Lüthge, Christine Bergeron, Friedrich Kommoss, Thomas Löning, Jaume Ordi, Sigrid Regauer, Ruediger Ridder.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) has been shown to increase the sensitivity and negative predictive value for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+), either when used in conjunction with Pap cytology testing or alone. However, there is no satisfying clinical management algorithm for women testing Pap negative/HPV positive. We therefore evaluated the clinical utility of a novel dual biomarker-based approach (p16/Ki-67 Dual-stained cytology) for the identification of CIN2+ in women with Pap negative/HPV positive screening results, without the need to refer all women to immediate colposcopy.
METHODS: All women aged ≥30 enrolled during 2007/2008 into a regional prospective Pap/HPV co-testing screening pilot project and tested Pap negative, but positive for HPV (n=425) were included in the analysis. p16/Ki-67 Dual-stained cytology was performed from residual cellular material available from the liquid-based cytology vial collected during the initial Pap/HPV co-testing screening visit. Results were correlated to the presence of CIN2+ confirmed during preliminary follow-up.
RESULTS: p16/Ki-67 Dual-stained cytology tested positive at baseline in 108 out of 425 (25.4%) Pap negative/HPV positive cases. Sensitivity of Dual-stain testing for the detection of biopsy-confirmed CIN2+ during preliminary follow-up within the group of Pap negative/HPV positive women was 91.9% for CIN2+ (34/37 cases), and 96.4% for CIN3+ (27/28 cases). Specificity was 82.1% for CIN2+ on biopsy, and 76.9% for CIN3+, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Triaging Pap negative/HPV positive screening test results with p16/Ki-67 Dual-stained cytology may identify women with a high probability of underlying CIN2+ and may efficiently complement HPV-based screening programs to prevent cervical cancer.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21420158     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.02.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  51 in total

Review 1.  Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer: biomarkers for improved prevention efforts.

Authors:  Vikrant V Sahasrabuddhe; Patricia Luhn; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.165

2.  Relevance of HPV Screening for Triaging Equivocal Cytology Findings in the Pap II-p, Pap III and Pap IIID Groups - Results of Two Long-Term Studies.

Authors:  A Luyten; K U Petry
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 3.  [Indications for p16/Ki-67 in cervical cytology].

Authors:  P Ziemke; H Griesser
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 4.  Human Papillomavirus Laboratory Testing: the Changing Paradigm.

Authors:  Eileen M Burd
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  On-chip immunofluorescence analysis of single cervical cells using an electroactive microwell array with barrier for cervical screening.

Authors:  Makoto Takeuchi; Kazunori Nagasaka; Mina Yoshida; Yoshiko Kawata; Yuko Miyagawa; Saori Tago; Haruko Hiraike; Osamu Wada-Hiraike; Katsutoshi Oda; Yutaka Osuga; Tomoyuki Fujii; Takuya Ayabe; Soo Hyeon Kim; Teruo Fujii
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.800

6.  Dual staining for p16/Ki67 is a more specific test than cytology for triage of HPV-positive women.

Authors:  Carolina Areán-Cuns; Maria Mercado-Gutiérrez; Irene Paniello-Alastruey; Fermín Mallor-Giménez; Alicia Córdoba-Iturriagagoitia; Maria Lozano-Escario; Mercedes Santamaria-Martínez
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Screening: Cervical cancer--should we abandon cytology for screening?

Authors:  Chris J L M Meijer; Johannes Berkhof
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 8.  Clinical implications of (epi)genetic changes in HPV-induced cervical precancerous lesions.

Authors:  Renske D M Steenbergen; Peter J F Snijders; Daniëlle A M Heideman; Chris J L M Meijer
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 9.  Human papillomavirus DNA methylation as a potential biomarker for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Megan A Clarke; Nicolas Wentzensen; Lisa Mirabello; Arpita Ghosh; Sholom Wacholder; Ariana Harari; Attila Lorincz; Mark Schiffman; Robert D Burk
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 10.  HPV-FASTER: broadening the scope for prevention of HPV-related cancer.

Authors:  F Xavier Bosch; Claudia Robles; Mireia Díaz; Marc Arbyn; Iacopo Baussano; Christine Clavel; Guglielmo Ronco; Joakim Dillner; Matti Lehtinen; Karl-Ulrich Petry; Mario Poljak; Susanne K Kjaer; Chris J L M Meijer; Suzanne M Garland; Jorge Salmerón; Xavier Castellsagué; Laia Bruni; Silvia de Sanjosé; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.