BACKGROUND: Although cytological screening for cervical precancers has led to a reduction of cervical cancer incidence worldwide it is a subjective and variable method with low single-test sensitivity. New biomarkers like p16 that specifically highlight abnormal cervical cells can improve cytology performance. Virtual microscopy offers an ideal platform for assisted evaluation and archiving of biomarker-stained slides. METHODS: We first performed a quantitative analysis of p16-stained slides digitized with the Hamamatsu NDP slide scanner. From the results an automated algorithm was created to reliably detect cells, nuclei and p16-stained cells. The algorithm's performance was evaluated on two complete slides and tiles from 52 independent slides (11,628, 4094 and 25,619 cells/clusters, respectively). RESULTS: We achieved excellent performance to discriminate unstained cells from nuclei and biomarker-stained cells. The automated algorithm showed a high overall and positive agreement (99.0-99.7% and 70.9-83.4%, respectively) with the gold standard and had a very high sensitivity (89.1-100.0%) and specificity (98.9-100.0%) to detect biomarker-stained cells. CONCLUSION: We implemented a virtual microscopy system allowing highly efficient automated prescreening and archiving of biomarker-stained slides. Based on the initial results, we will evaluate the performance of our system in large epidemiologic studies against disease endpoints.
BACKGROUND: Although cytological screening for cervical precancers has led to a reduction of cervical cancer incidence worldwide it is a subjective and variable method with low single-test sensitivity. New biomarkers like p16 that specifically highlight abnormal cervical cells can improve cytology performance. Virtual microscopy offers an ideal platform for assisted evaluation and archiving of biomarker-stained slides. METHODS: We first performed a quantitative analysis of p16-stained slides digitized with the Hamamatsu NDP slide scanner. From the results an automated algorithm was created to reliably detect cells, nuclei and p16-stained cells. The algorithm's performance was evaluated on two complete slides and tiles from 52 independent slides (11,628, 4094 and 25,619 cells/clusters, respectively). RESULTS: We achieved excellent performance to discriminate unstained cells from nuclei and biomarker-stained cells. The automated algorithm showed a high overall and positive agreement (99.0-99.7% and 70.9-83.4%, respectively) with the gold standard and had a very high sensitivity (89.1-100.0%) and specificity (98.9-100.0%) to detect biomarker-stained cells. CONCLUSION: We implemented a virtual microscopy system allowing highly efficient automated prescreening and archiving of biomarker-stained slides. Based on the initial results, we will evaluate the performance of our system in large epidemiologic studies against disease endpoints.
Authors: Julia C Gage; Arpita Ghosh; Sylvia Borgonovo; Stephen Follansbee; Nicolas Wentzensen; Patti E Gravitt; Niels Grabe; Bernd Lahrmann; Philip E Castle Journal: Acta Cytol Date: 2011-07-22 Impact factor: 2.319
Authors: Nicolas Wentzensen; Barbara Fetterman; Philip E Castle; Mark Schiffman; Shannon N Wood; Eric Stiemerling; Diane Tokugawa; Clara Bodelon; Nancy Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Walter Kinney Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Megan A Clarke; Li C Cheung; Philip E Castle; Mark Schiffman; Diane Tokugawa; Nancy Poitras; Thomas Lorey; Walter Kinney; Nicolas Wentzensen Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Nicolas Wentzensen; Lauren Schwartz; Rosemary E Zuna; Katie Smith; Cara Mathews; Michael A Gold; R Andy Allen; Roy Zhang; S Terence Dunn; Joan L Walker; Mark Schiffman Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-06-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Nicolas Wentzensen; Megan A Clarke; Renee Bremer; Nancy Poitras; Diane Tokugawa; Patricia E Goldhoff; Philip E Castle; Mark Schiffman; Julie D Kingery; Kiranjit K Grewal; Alex Locke; Walter Kinney; Thomas S Lorey Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Nicolas Wentzensen; Bernd Lahrmann; Megan A Clarke; Walter Kinney; Diane Tokugawa; Nancy Poitras; Alex Locke; Liam Bartels; Alexandra Krauthoff; Joan Walker; Rosemary Zuna; Kiranjit K Grewal; Patricia E Goldhoff; Julie D Kingery; Philip E Castle; Mark Schiffman; Thomas S Lorey; Niels Grabe Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 13.506