Literature DB >> 30325645

Will machine learning end the viability of radiology as a thriving medical specialty?

Stephen Chan1, Eliot L Siegel2.   

Abstract

There have been tremendous advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) within the past decade, especially in the application of deep learning to various challenges. These include advanced competitive games (such as Chess and Go), self-driving cars, speech recognition, and intelligent personal assistants. Rapid advances in computer vision for recognition of objects in pictures have led some individuals, including computer science experts and health care system experts in machine learning, to make predictions that ML algorithms will soon lead to the replacement of the radiologist. However, there are complex technological, regulatory, and medicolegal obstacles facing the implementation of machine learning in radiology that will definitely preclude replacement of the radiologist by these algorithms within the next two decades and beyond. While not a comprehensive review of machine learning, this article is intended to highlight specific features of machine learning which face significant technological and health care systems challenges. Rather than replacing radiologists, machine learning will provide quantitative tools that will increase the value of diagnostic imaging as a biomarker, increase image quality with decreased acquisition times, and improve workflow, communication, and patient safety. In the foreseeable future, we predict that today's generation of radiologists will be replaced not by ML algorithms, but by a new breed of data science-savvy radiologists who have embraced and harnessed the incredible potential that machine learning has to advance our ability to care for our patients. In this way, radiology will remain a viable medical specialty for years to come.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30325645      PMCID: PMC6404816          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  23 in total

1.  Basic principles of ROC analysis.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.446

2.  Knowledge sharing in radiology.

Authors:  Richard Gunderman; Stephen Chan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  How widely is computer-aided detection used in screening and diagnostic mammography?

Authors:  Vijay M Rao; David C Levin; Laurence Parker; Barbara Cavanaugh; Andrea J Frangos; Jonathan H Sunshine
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 4.  Strategy development for anticipating and handling a disruptive technology.

Authors:  Stephen Chan
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 5.  The preponderance of evidence supports computer-aided detection for screening mammography.

Authors:  Robyn L Birdwell
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Can computer-aided detection be detrimental to mammographic interpretation?

Authors:  Liane E Philpotts
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center.

Authors:  T W Freer; M J Ulissey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice.

Authors:  Joshua J Fenton; Linn Abraham; Stephen H Taplin; Berta M Geller; Patricia A Carney; Carl D'Orsi; Joann G Elmore; William E Barlow
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 9.  Computer-aided detection mammography for breast cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Meredith Noble; Wendy Bruening; Stacey Uhl; Karen Schoelles
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 2.344

10.  Feature-based classifiers for somatic mutation detection in tumour-normal paired sequencing data.

Authors:  Jiarui Ding; Ali Bashashati; Andrew Roth; Arusha Oloumi; Kane Tse; Thomas Zeng; Gholamreza Haffari; Martin Hirst; Marco A Marra; Anne Condon; Samuel Aparicio; Sohrab P Shah
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Physician centred imaging interpretation is dying out - why should I be a nuclear medicine physician?

Authors:  Roland Hustinx
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Open access image repositories: high-quality data to enable machine learning research.

Authors:  F Prior; J Almeida; P Kathiravelu; T Kurc; K Smith; T J Fitzgerald; J Saltz
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2019-04-28       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  Fostering a Healthy AI Ecosystem for Radiology: Conclusions of the 2018 RSNA Summit on AI in Radiology.

Authors:  Falgun H Chokshi; Adam E Flanders; Luciano M Prevedello; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2019-03-27

Review 4.  Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for HIV Prevention: Emerging Approaches to Ending the Epidemic.

Authors:  Julia L Marcus; Whitney C Sewell; Laura B Balzer; Douglas S Krakower
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 5.071

Review 5.  Artificial Intelligence: reshaping the practice of radiological sciences in the 21st century.

Authors:  Issam El Naqa; Masoom A Haider; Maryellen L Giger; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Implementation and design of artificial intelligence in abdominal imaging.

Authors:  Hailey H Choi; Silvia D Chang; Marc D Kohli
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-12

7.  Making AI Even Smarter Using Ensembles: A Challenge to Future Challenges and Implications for Clinical Care.

Authors:  Eliot L Siegel
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2019-11-20

Review 8.  Clinical applications and performance of intelligent systems in dental and maxillofacial radiology: A review.

Authors:  Ravleen Nagi; Konidena Aravinda; N Rakesh; Rajesh Gupta; Ajay Pal; Amrit Kaur Mann
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2020-06-18

Review 9.  Integrating radiomics into holomics for personalised oncology: from algorithms to bedside.

Authors:  Roberto Gatta; Adrien Depeursinge; Osman Ratib; Olivier Michielin; Antoine Leimgruber
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2020-02-07

Review 10.  Reviewing the relationship between machines and radiology: the application of artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Rani Ahmad
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2021-02-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.