Literature DB >> 19789250

The preponderance of evidence supports computer-aided detection for screening mammography.

Robyn L Birdwell1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19789250     DOI： 10.1148/radiol.2531090611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN： 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


× No keyword cloud information.
  13 in total

1.  Empirical investigation of radiologists' priorities for PACS selection: an analytical hierarchy process approach.

Authors:  Vivek Joshi; Kyootai Lee; David Melson; Vamsi R Narra
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Exploring the potential of context-sensitive CADe in screening mammography.

Authors:  Georgia D Tourassi; Maciej A Mazurowski; Brian P Harrawood; Elizabeth A Krupinski
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  False positive marks on unsuspicious screening mammography with computer-aided detection.

Authors:  Mary C Mahoney; Karthikeyan Meganathan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Analog Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) information can be more effective than binary marks.

Authors:  Corbin A Cunningham; Trafton Drew; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  PACS administrators' and radiologists' perspective on the importance of features for PACS selection.

Authors:  Vivek Joshi; Vamsi R Narra; Kailash Joshi; Kyootai Lee; David Melson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice.

Authors:  Joshua J Fenton; Linn Abraham; Stephen H Taplin; Berta M Geller; Patricia A Carney; Carl D'Orsi; Joann G Elmore; William E Barlow
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Will machine learning end the viability of radiology as a thriving medical specialty?

Authors:  Stephen Chan; Eliot L Siegel
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Robert D Wellman; Diana S M Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Anna N A Tosteson; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  When and why might a computer-aided detection (CAD) system interfere with visual search? An eye-tracking study.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Corbin Cunningham; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Is computer aided detection (CAD) cost effective in screening mammography? A model based on the CADET II study.

Authors:  Carla Guerriero; Maureen G C Gillan; John Cairns; Matthew G Wallis; Fiona J Gilbert
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 2.655
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.