Literature DB >> 30322586

Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies.

Ana Pilar Betrán1, Marleen Temmerman2, Carol Kingdon3, Abdu Mohiddin4, Newton Opiyo5, Maria Regina Torloni6, Jun Zhang7, Othiniel Musana8, Sikolia Z Wanyonyi4, Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu9, Soo Downe3.   

Abstract

Optimising the use of caesarean section (CS) is of global concern. Underuse leads to maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. Conversely, overuse of CS has not shown benefits and can create harm. Worldwide, the frequency of CS continues to increase, and interventions to reduce unnecessary CSs have shown little success. Identifying the underlying factors for the continuing increase in CS use could improve the efficacy of interventions. In this Series paper, we describe the factors for CS use that are associated with women, families, health professionals, and health-care organisations and systems, and we examine behavioural, psychosocial, health system, and financial factors. We also outline the type and effects of interventions to reduce CS use that have been investigated. Clinical interventions, such as external cephalic version for breech delivery at term, vaginal breech delivery in appropriately selected women, and vaginal birth after CS, could reduce the frequency of CS use. Approaches such as labour companionship and midwife-led care have been associated with higher proportions of physiological births, safer outcomes, and lower health-care costs relative to control groups without these interventions, and with positive maternal experiences, in high-income countries. Such approaches need to be assessed in middle-income and low-income countries. Educational interventions for women should be complemented with meaningful dialogue with health professionals and effective emotional support for women and families. Investing in the training of health professionals, eliminating financial incentives for CS use, and reducing fear of litigation is fundamental. Safe, private, welcoming, and adequately resourced facilities are needed. At the country level, effective medical leadership is essential to ensure CS is used only when indicated. We conclude that interventions to reduce overuse must be multicomponent and locally tailored, addressing women's and health professionals' concerns, as well as health system and financial factors.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30322586     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31927-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  117 in total

Review 1.  The association of birth by caesarean section and cognitive outcomes in offspring: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julie A Blake; Madeleine Gardner; Jake Najman; James G Scott
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  The effect of continuous midwifery services on the delivery mode, labor progress, and nursing satisfaction of primiparas during natural deliveries.

Authors:  Yali Zhang; Kun Xu; Li Gong; Yunjia Sun; Fenfen Ren
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Caesarean delivery is associated with higher risk of overweight in the offspring: within-family analysis in the SUN cohort.

Authors:  Nerea Martín-Calvo; Miguel Ángel Martínez-González; Gloria Segura; Jorge E Chavarro; Silvia Carlos; Alfredo Gea
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 4.  Perioperative Complications of Hysterectomy After a Previous Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Siwanon Rattanakanokchai; Chumnan Kietpeerakool; Jatupol Srisomboon; Nampet Jampathong; Porjai Pattanittum; Pisake Lumbiganon
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 4.790

5.  Use of Cesarean Birth at Mizan Tepi University Teaching Hospital, Mizan Aman, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Margo S Harrison; Tewodros Liyew; Ephrem Kirub; Biruk Teshome; Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano; Margaret Muldrow; Teklemariam Yarinbab
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 2.372

6.  Management of prolonged first stage of labour in a low-resource setting: lessons learnt from rural Malawi.

Authors:  Wouter Bakker; Elisabeth van Dorp; Misheck Kazembe; Alfred Nkotola; Jos van Roosmalen; Thomas van den Akker
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of a quality improvement program to reduce caesarean sections in Brazilian private hospitals: a case study.

Authors:  Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues; Paula Mendes Luz; Barbara Vasques da Silva Ayres; Jacqueline Alves Torres; Maria do Carmo Leal
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 3.223

8.  Mode of delivery among nulliparous women with single, cephalic, term pregnancies: The WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health, 2004-2008.

Authors:  Margo S Harrison; Ana Pilar Betrán; Joshua P Vogel; Robert L Goldenberg; A Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.561

9.  Spontaneous vaginal birth varies significantly across US hospitals.

Authors:  Rebecca R S Clark; Eileen T Lake
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.689

10.  Characteristics and Outcomes Associated with Cesarean Birth as Compared to Vaginal Birth at Mizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Margo S Harrison; Ephrem Kirub; Tewodros Liyew; Biruk Teshome; Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano; Margaret Muldrow; Teklemariam Yarinbab
Journal:  J Womens Health Dev       Date:  2021-04-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.