Literature DB >> 34306489

The effect of continuous midwifery services on the delivery mode, labor progress, and nursing satisfaction of primiparas during natural deliveries.

Yali Zhang1, Kun Xu1, Li Gong1, Yunjia Sun1, Fenfen Ren1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of continuous midwifery services on the delivery mode, labor progress, and primiparas' nursing satisfaction levels during natural deliveries.
METHODS: 340 primiparas admitted to our hospital from January 2017 to June 2020 were recruited as the study cohort and randomized into a continuous midwifery group and a traditional midwifery group, with 170 patients in each group. They underwent traditional midwifery nursing services and continuous midwifery services, respectively. The two groups' delivery modes, labor progress, analgesic methods, perinatal Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) scores, postpartum hemorrhage amounts, Apgar scores, and nursing satisfaction levels were compared.
RESULTS: The natural delivery rate in the continuous midwifery group was higher than it was in the traditional midwifery group (P<0.05). The maternal non-drug analgesia rate in the continuous midwifery group was higher than it was in the traditional midwifery group (P<0.05). The duration of the first stage in the continuous midwifery group was shorter than it was in the traditional midwifery group (P<0.05). The comparisons made during the second and third stages in the two groups showed no statistical differences (P>0.05). The SAS scores in the continuous midwifery group were significantly better than the SAS scores in the traditional midwifery group at the time of waiting for delivery and at one day after delivery (P<0.01). The postpartum hemorrhage amounts in the continuous midwifery group were lower than they were in the traditional midwifery group (P<0.01). The neonatal Apgar scores and maternal nursing satisfaction levels in the continuous midwifery group were better than they were in the traditional midwifery group (P<0.01).
CONCLUSION: Continuous delivery services for primiparas during natural delivery can significantly increase the natural delivery rate, reduce the use of analgesics, shorten the delivery times, alleviate the delivery-related anxiety levels in the primiparas, reduce postpartum hemorrhages, effectively improve the delivery outcomes, improve the quality of the newborns, and improve the primiparas' nursing satisfaction levels, so it is worthy of clinical promotion and application. AJTR
Copyright © 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Primiparas; continuous midwifery services; delivery modes; labor progress; natural delivery; nursing satisfaction

Year:  2021        PMID: 34306489      PMCID: PMC8290655     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transl Res        ISSN: 1943-8141            Impact factor:   4.060


  20 in total

1.  The impact of caseload midwifery, compared with standard care, on women's perceptions of antenatal care quality: Survey results from the M@NGO randomized controlled trial for women of any risk.

Authors:  Jyai Allen; Sue Kildea; Mark B Tracy; Donna L Hartz; Alec W Welsh; Sally K Tracy
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2019-06-23       Impact factor: 3.689

Review 2.  Factors that influence the provision of intrapartum and postnatal care by skilled birth attendants in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Susan Munabi-Babigumira; Claire Glenton; Simon Lewin; Atle Fretheim; Harriet Nabudere
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-17

3.  Acknowledging the primacy of continuity of care experiences in midwifery education.

Authors:  Jennifer Gamble; Mary Sidebotham; Andrea Gilkison; Deborah Davis; Linda Sweet
Journal:  Women Birth       Date:  2019-09-28       Impact factor: 3.172

4.  Caseload midwifery for women with fear of birth is a feasible option.

Authors:  Ingegerd Hildingsson; Christine Rubertsson; Annika Karlström; Helen Haines
Journal:  Sex Reprod Healthc       Date:  2018-02-13

5.  A known midwife can make a difference for women with fear of childbirth- birth outcome and women's experiences of intrapartum care.

Authors:  Ingegerd Hildingsson; Christine Rubertsson; Annika Karlström; Helen Haines
Journal:  Sex Reprod Healthc       Date:  2019-06-15

6.  Socioeconomic differences in access to care in Australia for women fearful of birth.

Authors:  Jocelyn Toohill; Emily Callander; Haylee Fox; Daniel Lindsay; Jenny Gamble; Debra Creedy; Jennifer Fenwick
Journal:  Aust Health Rev       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 7.  Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies.

Authors:  Ana Pilar Betrán; Marleen Temmerman; Carol Kingdon; Abdu Mohiddin; Newton Opiyo; Maria Regina Torloni; Jun Zhang; Othiniel Musana; Sikolia Z Wanyonyi; Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu; Soo Downe
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Woman-centred care during pregnancy and birth in Ireland: thematic analysis of women's and clinicians' experiences.

Authors:  Andrew Hunter; Declan Devane; Catherine Houghton; Annmarie Grealish; Agnes Tully; Valerie Smith
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Policy, evidence and practice for post-birth care plans: a scoping review.

Authors:  Susan Crowther; Emma MacIver; Annie Lau
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 10.  Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.

Authors:  Jane Sandall; Hora Soltani; Simon Gates; Andrew Shennan; Declan Devane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-28
View more
  1 in total

1.  Focus on the Analysis of the Effect of Solving the Nursing Mode on the Time of the Production Time of the First Maternity and the Subjective Happiness of the Postpartum.

Authors:  Tianmin Zhang; Lingyun Zhang
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 3.009

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.