Helen B Chin1, Anne Marie Jukic2, Allen J Wilcox3, Clarice R Weinberg4, Kelly K Ferguson3, Antonia M Calafat5, D Robert McConnaughey6, Donna D Baird3. 1. Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: helen.chin@nih.gov. 2. Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, Yale Center for Perinatal, Pediatric, and Environmental Epidemiology, New Haven, CT, USA. 3. Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, NC, USA. 4. Biostatistics Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, NC, USA. 5. Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. 6. Westat, Durham, NC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Phthalates and bisphenol A (BPA) are environmental contaminants that may affect early embryonic development. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between phthalate metabolites and BPA with early pregnancy endpoints in a cohort of women followed from before conception. METHODS: We quantified 11 phthalate metabolites and BPA in 137 conception cycles from naturally conceived clinical pregnancies. Phthalate metabolites and BPA concentrations were measured in a pooled sample of three daily morning urine specimens. Daily urinary hormone measurements had previously been used to define ovulation, implantation, and corpus luteum rescue. We assessed associations between conception cycle exposures (phthalate biomarkers and BPA) and 1) time from ovulation to implantation; 2) type of corpus luteum rescue (timing and pattern of rise in progesterone: early, late, or no rise); and 3) rate of initial rise in hCG. RESULTS: Mono(3-carboxypropyl) phthalate (MCPP) and mono-isobutyl phthalate (MiBP) were associated with earlier implantation (6-8 days vs. 9 days (the most commonly observed); per natural log-unit, OR (95% CI) = 2.8 (1.2, 6.7) and OR (CI) = 2.1 (1.2, 3.7), respectively). Monoethyl phthalate (MEP) was associated with later implantation (10-12 days vs. 9 days); OR (CI) = 1.5 (1.0, 2.1). Compared with implantation on day 9, BPA was significantly associated with both earlier and later implantation (OR=2.2 for both). Women with concentrations above the median of monobenzyl phthalate (MBzP) (p = 0.04) or above the median of the molar sum of four di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate metabolites (∑DEHP) (p = 0.08) had a slower initial rise in hCG. Increasing MCPP was associated with an increased odds of a late rise rescue (OR (CI) = 2.9 (1.0, 8.5); late rise vs. early rise), while increasing MEP was associated with a no rise rescue (OR (CI) = 1.6 (0.9, 2.8); no rise vs. early rise). CONCLUSIONS: The reported associations varied in their direction of effect, some potentially protective, others adverse. This may reflect the complexity with which these potential endocrine disrupting chemicals can be acting, but chance findings are also possible. Given that women continue to be exposed to these compounds (or their precursors), continued research on the effects they may have on pregnancy is warranted.
BACKGROUND:Phthalates and bisphenol A (BPA) are environmental contaminants that may affect early embryonic development. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between phthalate metabolites and BPA with early pregnancy endpoints in a cohort of women followed from before conception. METHODS: We quantified 11 phthalate metabolites and BPA in 137 conception cycles from naturally conceived clinical pregnancies. Phthalate metabolites and BPA concentrations were measured in a pooled sample of three daily morning urine specimens. Daily urinary hormone measurements had previously been used to define ovulation, implantation, and corpus luteum rescue. We assessed associations between conception cycle exposures (phthalate biomarkers and BPA) and 1) time from ovulation to implantation; 2) type of corpus luteum rescue (timing and pattern of rise in progesterone: early, late, or no rise); and 3) rate of initial rise in hCG. RESULTS:Mono(3-carboxypropyl) phthalate (MCPP) and mono-isobutyl phthalate (MiBP) were associated with earlier implantation (6-8 days vs. 9 days (the most commonly observed); per natural log-unit, OR (95% CI) = 2.8 (1.2, 6.7) and OR (CI) = 2.1 (1.2, 3.7), respectively). Monoethyl phthalate (MEP) was associated with later implantation (10-12 days vs. 9 days); OR (CI) = 1.5 (1.0, 2.1). Compared with implantation on day 9, BPA was significantly associated with both earlier and later implantation (OR=2.2 for both). Women with concentrations above the median of monobenzyl phthalate (MBzP) (p = 0.04) or above the median of the molar sum of four di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate metabolites (∑DEHP) (p = 0.08) had a slower initial rise in hCG. Increasing MCPP was associated with an increased odds of a late rise rescue (OR (CI) = 2.9 (1.0, 8.5); late rise vs. early rise), while increasing MEP was associated with a no rise rescue (OR (CI) = 1.6 (0.9, 2.8); no rise vs. early rise). CONCLUSIONS: The reported associations varied in their direction of effect, some potentially protective, others adverse. This may reflect the complexity with which these potential endocrine disrupting chemicals can be acting, but chance findings are also possible. Given that women continue to be exposed to these compounds (or their precursors), continued research on the effects they may have on pregnancy is warranted.
Authors: Robert N Hoover; Marianne Hyer; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Ervin Adam; Brian Bond; Andrea L Cheville; Theodore Colton; Patricia Hartge; Elizabeth E Hatch; Arthur L Herbst; Beth Y Karlan; Raymond Kaufman; Kenneth L Noller; Julie R Palmer; Stanley J Robboy; Robert C Saal; William Strohsnitter; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Rebecca Troisi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-10-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A J Wilcox; C R Weinberg; J F O'Connor; D D Baird; J P Schlatterer; R E Canfield; E G Armstrong; B C Nisula Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1988-07-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Anne Marie Jukic; Antonia M Calafat; D Robert McConnaughey; Matthew P Longnecker; Jane A Hoppin; Clarice R Weinberg; Allen J Wilcox; Donna D Baird Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2015-07-10 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Jiahui Wang; Zefei Xu; Jingyu Yao; Maochao Hu; Yuewen Sun; Cong Dong; Zhongming Bu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Melanie H Jacobson; Penelope P Howards; James S Kesner; Juliana W Meadows; Celia E Dominguez; Jessica B Spencer; Lyndsey A Darrow; Metrecia L Terrell; Michele Marcus Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Haotian Wu; Allison J Kupsco; Andrea L Deierlein; Allan C Just; Antonia M Calafat; Emily Oken; Joseph M Braun; Adriana Mercado-Garcia; Alejandra Cantoral; Martha M Téllez-Rojo; Robert O Wright; Andrea A Baccarelli Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Thoin F Begum; Victor Y Fujimoto; Roy Gerona; Alexandra McGough; Nikolaus Lenhart; Rebecca Wong; Evelyn Mok-Lin; Jonathan Melamed; Celeste D Butts; Michael S Bloom Journal: Reprod Toxicol Date: 2020-11-30 Impact factor: 3.143
Authors: Helen B Chin; Anne Marie Jukic; Allen J Wilcox; Clarice R Weinberg; Kelly K Ferguson; Antonia M Calafat; D Robert McConnaughey; Donna D Baird Journal: Environ Health Date: 2019-08-30 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: John E Schjenken; Ella S Green; Tenuis S Overduin; Chui Yan Mah; Darryl L Russell; Sarah A Robertson Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2021-04-12 Impact factor: 5.555