Literature DB >> 30321346

Response to a selection index including environmental costs and risk preferences of producers.

Beshir M Ali1, John W M Bastiaansen2, Yann de Mey1, Alfons G J M Oude Lansink1.   

Abstract

Genetic improvement of animals plays an important role in improving the economic and environmental sustainability of livestock production systems. This paper proposes a method to incorporate mitigation of environmental impacts and risk preferences of producers into a breeding objective via economic values (EVs). The paper assesses the effects of using these alternative EVs of breeding goal traits on discounted economic response to selection and on environmental impacts at commercial farm level. The application focuses on a Brazilian pig production system. Separate dam- and sire-line breeding programs that supply parents in a 3-tier production system for producing crossbreds (fattening pigs) at commercial level were assumed. Using EVs that are derived from utility functions by incorporating risk aversion increases the cumulative discounted economic response to selection in sire-line selection (6%) while reducing response in dam-line selection (12%) compared with the use of traditional EVs. The use of EVs that include environmental costs increases the cumulative discounted social response to selection in both dam-line (5%) and sire-line (10%) selections. Emission of greenhouse gases, and excretion of nitrogen and phosphorus can be reduced more with genetic improvements of production traits than reproduction traits for the typical Brazilian farrow-to-finish pig farm. Reductions in environmental impacts do not, however, depend on the use of the different EVs (i.e., with and without taking into account environmental costs and risk). Both environmental costs and risk preferences of producers need to be considered in sire-line selection, and only environmental costs in dam-line selection to improve, at the same time, the economic and environmental sustainability of the Brazilian pig production system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30321346      PMCID: PMC6313115          DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  21 in total

Review 1.  Definition of animal breeding goals for sustainable production systems.

Authors:  I Olesen; A F Groen; B Gjerde
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  SelAction: software to predict selection response and rate of inbreeding in livestock breeding programs.

Authors:  M J M Rutten; P Bijma; J A Woolliams; J A M van Arendonk
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.645

3.  Developing breeding schemes to assist mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions.

Authors:  E Wall; G Simm; D Moran
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The Genetic Basis for Constructing Selection Indexes.

Authors:  L N Hazel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1943-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Selection response and genetic parameters for residual feed intake in Yorkshire swine.

Authors:  W Cai; D S Casey; J C M Dekkers
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Impact of milk pricing system on the economic response to selection on milk components.

Authors:  M Wolfová; J Wolf; J Pribyl
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Genetic parameters for residual feed intake in growing pigs, with emphasis on genetic relationships with carcass and meat quality traits.

Authors:  H Gilbert; J-P Bidanel; J Gruand; J-C Caritez; Y Billon; P Guillouet; H Lagant; J Noblet; P Sellier
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Impact of piglet birth weight, birth order, and litter size on subsequent growth performance, carcass quality, muscle composition, and eating quality of pork.

Authors:  A D Beaulieu; J L Aalhus; N H Williams; J F Patience
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 9.  Breeding for societally important traits in pigs.

Authors:  E Kanis; K H De Greef; A Hiemstra; J A M van Arendonk
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  The effect of errors in the economic weights on the accuracy of selection indexes.

Authors:  W Vandepitte; L Hazel
Journal:  Ann Genet Sel Anim       Date:  1977
View more
  3 in total

1.  Diet and Greenhouse Gas Outputs in Pigs.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.338

2.  Validation of a beef cattle maternal breeding objective based on a cross-sectional analysis of a large national cattle database.

Authors:  Alan J Twomey; Andrew R Cromie; Noirin McHugh; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  The genetic correlation between feed conversion ratio and growth rate affects the design of a breeding program for more sustainable fish production.

Authors:  Mathieu Besson; Hans Komen; Gus Rose; Marc Vandeputte
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 4.297

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.