Literature DB >> 22443941

Developing breeding schemes to assist mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions.

E Wall1, G Simm, D Moran.   

Abstract

Genetic improvement of livestock is a particularly effective technology, producing permanent and cumulative changes in performance. This paper highlights some of the options for including mitigation in livestock breeding schemes, focusing on ruminant species, and details three routes through which genetic improvement can help to reduce emissions per kg product via: (i) improving productivity and efficiency, (ii) reducing wastage in the farming system and (iii) directly selecting on emissions, if or when these are measurable. Selecting on traits that improve the efficiency of the system (e.g. residual feed intake, longevity) will have a favourable effect on the overall emissions from the system. Specific examples of how genetic selection will have a favourable effect on emissions for UK dairy systems are described. The development of breeding schemes that incorporate environmental concerns is both desirable and possible. An example of how economic valuation of public good outcomes can be incorporated into UK dairy selection indices is given. This paper focuses on genetic selection tools using, on the whole, currently available traits and tools. However, new direct and indirect measurement techniques for emissions will improve the potential to reduce emissions by genetic selection. The complexities of global forces on defining selection objectives are also highlighted.

Year:  2010        PMID: 22443941     DOI: 10.1017/S175173110999070X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  19 in total

Review 1.  The eco-evolutionary impacts of domestication and agricultural practices on wild species.

Authors:  Martin M Turcotte; Hitoshi Araki; Daniel S Karp; Katja Poveda; Susan R Whitehead
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Response to a selection index including environmental costs and risk preferences of producers.

Authors:  Beshir M Ali; John W M Bastiaansen; Yann de Mey; Alfons G J M Oude Lansink
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Estimates of the genetic contribution to methane emission in dairy cows: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Navid Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 4.  Animal board invited review: genetic possibilities to reduce enteric methane emissions from ruminants.

Authors:  N K Pickering; V H Oddy; J Basarab; K Cammack; B Hayes; R S Hegarty; J Lassen; J C McEwan; S Miller; C S Pinares-Patiño; Y de Haas
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  The Impacts of Climate Change Mitigation Strategies on Animal Welfare.

Authors:  Sara Shields; Geoffrey Orme-Evans
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Sire and liveweight affect feed intake and methane emissions of sheep confined in respiration chambers.

Authors:  D L Robinson; J P Goopy; A J Donaldson; R T Woodgate; V H Oddy; R S Hegarty
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Genetic aspects of feed efficiency and reduction of environmental footprint in broilers: a review.

Authors:  Ewa Sell-Kubiak; Klaus Wimmers; Henry Reyer; Tomasz Szwaczkowski
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effect of production quotas on economic and environmental values of growth rate and feed efficiency in sea cage fish farming.

Authors:  M Besson; I J M de Boer; M Vandeputte; J A M van Arendonk; E Quillet; H Komen; J Aubin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Carbon myopia: The urgent need for integrated social, economic and environmental action in the livestock sector.

Authors:  Matthew Tom Harrison; Brendan Richard Cullen; Dianne Elizabeth Mayberry; Annette Louise Cowie; Franco Bilotto; Warwick Brabazon Badgery; Ke Liu; Thomas Davison; Karen Michelle Christie; Albert Muleke; Richard John Eckard
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2021-08-29       Impact factor: 13.211

10.  Utilization of farm animal genetic resources in a changing agro-ecological environment in the Nordic countries.

Authors:  Juha Kantanen; Peter Løvendahl; Erling Strandberg; Emma Eythorsdottir; Meng-Hua Li; Anne Kettunen-Præbel; Peer Berg; Theo Meuwissen
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.