Literature DB >> 10764063

Definition of animal breeding goals for sustainable production systems.

I Olesen1, A F Groen, B Gjerde.   

Abstract

What we do is determined by the way we "view" a complex issue and what sample of issues or events we choose to deal with. In this paper, a model based on a communal, cultural, or people-centered worldview, informed by a subjective epistemology and a holistic ontology, is considered. Definitions and interpretations of sustainable agriculture are reviewed. Common elements in published definitions of sustainable agriculture and animal production among those who seek long-term and equitable solutions for food production are resource efficiency, profitability, productivity, environmental soundness, biodiversity, social viability, and ethical aspects. Possible characteristics of future sustainable production systems and further development are presented. The impact of these characteristics on animal breeding goals is reviewed. The need for long-term biologically, ecologically, and sociologically sound breeding goals is emphasized, because animal breeding determined only by short-term market forces leads to unwanted side effects. Hence, a procedure for defining animal breeding goals with ethical priorities and weighing of market and non-market values is suggested. Implementation of non-market as well as market economic trait values in the aggregate genotype, as suggested, may allow for breeding programs that contribute to sustainable production systems. Examples of breeding goals in salmon, cattle, and pigs are given, and the resulting genetic responses are evaluated with respect to economic profit (or costs) and other criteria of sustainability. Important prerequisites for breeding programs for sustainable production are appropriate governmental policies, awareness of our way of thinking, and a more communal worldview informed by a subjective epistemology and a holistic ontology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10764063     DOI: 10.2527/2000.783570x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  6 in total

1.  Response to a selection index including environmental costs and risk preferences of producers.

Authors:  Beshir M Ali; John W M Bastiaansen; Yann de Mey; Alfons G J M Oude Lansink
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Mutilating Procedures, Management Practices, and Housing Conditions That May Affect the Welfare of Farm Animals: Implications for Welfare Research.

Authors:  Rebecca E Nordquist; Franz Josef van der Staay; Frank J C M van Eerdenburg; Francisca C Velkers; Lisa Fijn; Saskia S Arndt
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Assessing the relative importance of health and conformation traits in the cavalier king Charles spaniel.

Authors:  Katrien Wijnrocx; Liesbeth François; Peter Goos; Nadine Buys; Steven Janssens
Journal:  Canine Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2018-01-23

4.  Opportunities to Improve Resilience in Animal Breeding Programs.

Authors:  Tom V L Berghof; Marieke Poppe; Han A Mulder
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 5.  From Desert to Medicine: A Review of Camel Genomics and Therapeutic Products.

Authors:  Amanat Ali; Bincy Baby; Ranjit Vijayan
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 6.  Genotype by environment interaction and breeding for robustness in livestock.

Authors:  Wendy M Rauw; Luis Gomez-Raya
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.599

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.