| Literature DB >> 30320267 |
Ayndrila Ghosh1, Sujoy Das1, Himadri S Sarkar1, Shampa Kundu1, Prithidipa Sahoo1.
Abstract
A unique method has been developed for comparative analysis ofEntities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30320267 PMCID: PMC6173501 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b01751
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1(a) UV–vis absorption spectra of PN-N (20 μM) upon addition of H2S up to 20 equiv in CH3CN/H2O (1:8, v/v; pH 7.0; 10 mM phosphate buffer). (Inset) Visual changes of PN-N after addition of H2S. (b) Fluorescence emission spectra of PN-N (20 μM) after addition of H2S in CH3CN/H2O (1:8, v/v; pH 7.0; λmax = 435 nm). (Inset) Fluorescence turn-on of PN-N after addition of H2S. (c) Fluorescence intensity plot of probe PN-N as a function of time. (d) Pseudo-first-order kinetics plot for the reaction of PN-N with H2S.
Figure 2HOMO–LUMO distributions of PN-N and PN-NH.
Figure 3Calculated potential energy surfaces for the plausible mechanism of formation of PN-NH from PN-N. Energies are reported in kcal/mol.
Scheme 1Fluorescence Turn-On of PN-N after Addition of H2S
Figure 4Apparatus setup for analysis of H2S produced from dietary samples.
Figure 5(a) Images of filter paper strips after consumption of H2S vapor produced from food samples at 30 min interval. (b) Estimation of the concentration of H2S produced from the food samples following the standard curve. Standard deviations (SDs) are given by error bars, where n = 3.
Scheme 2Stepwise Preparation of the PN-N3 Probe