Literature DB >> 30319799

Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of (E)-1-(3,5-di-chloro-2-hy-droxy-phen-yl)-3-(5-methyl-furan-2-yl)prop-2-en-1-one.

N R Sreenatha1,2, B N Lakshminarayana1, D P Ganesha1, C R Gnanendra3.   

Abstract

The title chalcone derivative, C14H10Cl2O3, is almost planar, with a dihedral angle of 7.0 (2) ° between the 3,5-di-chloro-2-hy-droxy-phenyl and 5-methyl-furan rings. There is an intra-molecular O-H⋯O hydrogen bond present forming an S(6) ring motif. In the crystal, mol-ecules are linked by bifurcated C-H/H⋯O hydrogen bonds, enclosing an R 1 2(6) ring motif, forming a 21 helix propagating along the b-axis direction. The inter-molecular inter-actions were qu-anti-fied using Hirshfeld surface analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hirshfeld surfaces; chalcones; crystal structure; fingerprint plots; furan; hydrogen bonding

Year:  2018        PMID: 30319799      PMCID: PMC6176444          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018012173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Chalcone derivatives are an important class of organic compounds comprising two aromatic rings connected via an α,β unsaturated carbonyl system. They belong to the flavonoid family, which are basically found in fruits and vegetables (Hijova 2006 ▸). Chalcones occupy an important place in the pharmaceutical industry since their derivatives serve as the core structures for many organic compounds possessing various biological activities such as anti­bacterial (Vibhute & Baseer, 2003 ▸), anti-microbial (Prasad et al., 2006 ▸), anti-inflammatory (Lee et al., 2006 ▸), anti-hyperglycemic (Satyanarayana et al., 2004 ▸), anti-malarial (Syahri et al., 2017 ▸) and anti-oxidant (Cheng et al., 2008 ▸). Chalcones also exhibit some non-linear optical (NLO) properties and also find applications in laser technologies such as optical communications, data storage and signal processing because of the α,β unsaturated functionality (Shobha et al., 2017 ▸). Based on the above importance, we report here the crystal structure of (E)-1-(3,5-di­chloro-2-hy­droxy­phen­yl)-3-(5-methyl­furan-2-yl)prop-2-en-1-one.

Structural commentary

The title mol­ecule comprises 5-methyl­furan and 3,5-di­chloro-2-hy­droxy­phenyl rings connected via an unsaturated α,β carbonyl system as shown in Fig. 1 ▸. The mol­ecule is relatively planar with the furan and benzene rings being inclined to each other by 7.0 (2)°. There is an intra­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bond present forming an S(6) ring motif (Table 1 ▸ and Fig. 1 ▸). The chlorine atoms positioned at C13 and C15 of the phenyl ring are in an -anti-periplanar conformation described by the torsion angles C11—C12—C13—Cl19 = −179.1 (3)° and C13—C14—C15—Cl18 = −178.6 (4)°, while methyl group at C2 of the furan ring is in a +anti-periplanar conformation [C5—O1—C2—C6 = 178.3 (4)°]. The bond lengths and angles in the title compound are similar to those observed for 3-(furan-2-yl)-1-(2-hy­droxy­phen­yl)prop-2-en-1-one (Kong & Liu, 2008 ▸).
Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound, with atom labelling and 50% probability displacement ellipsoids. The intra­molecular hydrogen bond (Table 1 ▸) is indicated by a dashed line.

Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O17—H17⋯O100.821.762.489 (4)147
C4—H4⋯O10i 0.932.543.272 (6)135
C7—H7⋯O10i 0.932.573.359 (4)143

Symmetry code: (i) .

Supra­molecular features

In the crystal, mol­ecules are linked by bifurcated C—H/H⋯O hydrogen bonds, enclosing an (6) ring motif, forming a 21 helix with a pitch of 4.402 (1) Å, propagating along the b-axis direction (Table 1 ▸, Fig. 2 ▸). The helices appear to be linked by very weak inter­molecular C—H⋯Cl contacts (Table 2 ▸ and Fig. 3 ▸; see also Fig. 6 ▸ and the section below).
Figure 2

A view normal to the bc plane of the crystal packing of the title compound. The hydrogen bonds (Table 1 ▸) are shown as dashed lines and only the H atoms involved in these inter­actions are shown.

Table 2

Short contacts (Å) in the crystal structure of the title compound

l − vdW is the length minus the van der Waals separation.

Contactlength l − vdW
O10⋯H171.76−0.96
H4⋯O10i 2.54−0.17
H7⋯O10i 2.57−0.15
H6A⋯Cl18ii 3.21+0.26
H6C⋯Cl18ii 3.21+0.26
H6B⋯Cl18iii 3.14+0.19
Cl19⋯H6C iv 3.28+0.33
Cl19⋯H8v 3.13+0.18
Cl19⋯H12v 3.20+0.25
Cl18⋯H14vii 3.28+0.33

Symmetry codes: (i) 1 − x, − + y, − − z; (ii) −1 + x, −2 + y, z; (iii) −1 + x, −1 + y, z; (iv) 1 − x, −1 − y, −z; (v) 1 − x, −y, −z; (vi) 2 − x, 1 − y, −z.

Figure 3

A view along the b axis of the crystal packing of the title compound. The hydrogen bonds (Table 1 ▸) and short contacts (Table 2 ▸) in the crystal structure are shown as dashed lines.

Figure 6

Two-dimensional fingerprints plots.

Hirshfeld surfaces and 2D fingerprint analysis

Three-dimensional Hirshfeld surfaces and their associated two-dimensional fingerprint plots are used to analyze inter­molecular inter­actions in crystal structures. The Hirshfeld surfaces are unique for every crystal structure based on spherical atomic electron densities and are obtained using the CrystalExplorer software (Spackman & Jayatilaka 2009 ▸). The three-dimensional Hirshfeld surface was mapped over d norm using a red–blue–white colour scheme where the red and blue regions indicate contact distances less then and greater than, respectively, the sums of the van der Waals radii, which have negative and positive d norm values, respectively. In white regions where d norm is zero the contacts are almost equal to the sum of the van der Waals radii (Shaik et al. 2017 ▸). The presence of an inter­molecular C—H⋯O inter­action is indicated by a deep-red circular spot on the d norm surface (Fig. 4 ▸). In addition, inter­molecular C—H⋯O inter­actions can also be viewed on the Hirshfeld surface mapped over electrostatic potential using a STO-3G basis set at the HF (Hartree–Fock) level of theory (Spackman & McKinnon 2002 ▸; McKinnon et al. 2004 ▸) as shown in Fig. 5 ▸. The donor and acceptor atoms participating in these inter­actions are shown respectively as positive (blue regions) and negative electrostatic potentials (red regions).
Figure 4

The Hirshfeld surface mapped over d norm in the range −0.1183 to +1.0844 a.u. The circular red spots indicate inter­molecular C—H⋯O inter­actions.

Figure 5

The Hirshfeld surface mapped over electrostatic potential in the range −0.0506 to +0.0422 a.u. The donor and acceptor atoms participating in these inter­actions are shown respectively as positive (blue regions) and negative electrostatic potentials (red regions).

The two-dimensional fingerprint (Fig. 6 ▸) plots were generated in the expanded mode for all major inter­molecular inter­actions giving their percentage of contribution towards packing of total Hirshfeld surface area for the mol­ecule. The H⋯Cl inter­actions make the highest (26.1%) contribution to the total Hirshfeld surface and appear as a pair of wings in the region 1.2 Å < (d e + d i) < 1.8 Å (d i is the distance of a point on the Hirshfeld surface to the nearest nucleus inside the surface while d e is the distance of the nearest nucleus outside the surface). The H⋯H contacts, with a contribution of 25.7%, are shown as blue dots spread in the middle region 1.18 Å < (d e + d i) < 1.62 Å. The two sharp spikes observed at 1.04 Å < (d e + d i) < 1.39 Å are due to the presence of a pair of O⋯H contacts making a 15.2% contribution. A pair of C⋯H contacts are observed as characteristic wings in the region of 1.18 Å < (d e + d i) < 1.6 Å (13.0% contribution). C⋯C, C⋯Cl and O⋯C contacts make contributions of 7.9%, 5.2% and 3.8%, respectively.

Database survey

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.39, last update August 2018; Groom et al., 2016 ▸) for 3-(furan-2-yl)-1-(2-hy­droxy­phen­yl)prop-2-en-1-ones gave six hits. These involve only four compounds, namely: 3-(furan-2-yl)-1-(2-hy­droxy­phen­yl)prop-2-en-1-one itself (BOGVID; Kong & Liu, 2008 ▸); 1-(5-bromo-2-hy­droxy­phen­yl)-3-(2-fur­yl)prop-2-en-1-one, for which variable pressure measurements were carried out (KUDMON, KUDMON01, KUDMON02; Bakowicz et al., 2015 ▸); 1,1′-(4,6-dihy­droxy-1,3-phenyl­ene)bis­[3-(2-fur­yl)prop-2-en-1-one] (POHZUJ; Wera et al., 2014 ▸); and 1-(5-acetyl-2,4-di­hydroxy­phen­yl)-3-(2-fur­yl)prop-2-en-1-one (POJBAT; Wera et al., 2014 ▸). As in the title compound there are intra­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds present forming S(6) ring motifs. The mol­ecules are all relatively planar with the dihedral angle between the furan and 2-hy­droxy­phenyl rings varying from ca 8.35° in BOGVID, 0.20° in KUDMON, and 10.90 and 2.56° in the two independent mol­ecules of POJBAT. The only exception is POHZUJ, which possesses twofold rotation symmetry and has two [3-(2-fur­yl)prop-2-en-1-one] units meta to each other; here the dihedral angle is ca 19.87°.

Synthesis and crystallization

1-(3,5-Di­chloro-2-hy­droxy­phen­yl)-2-hy­droxy­ethanone (5 mmol) was dissolved in methanol (15 ml) and was stirred with 5 ml of sodium hydroxide solution for 30 min at room temperature. To this mixture, 5-methyl­furan-2-carbaldehyde (5 mmol) was added over 30 min with stirring. Stirring at room temperature was then continued for 32 h. On completion of the reaction, monitored by TLC, the mixture was quenched in ice–water and acidified with dilute hydro­chloric acid. The separated precipitate of the title compound was filtered off and recrystallized from methanol solution giving colourless block-like crystals.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3 ▸. Hydrogen atoms were placed in calculated positions and refined as riding: C—H = 0.93 Å with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C) for aromatic H atoms and C—H = 0.96 Å with U iso(H) = 1.5U eq(C) for methyl H atoms.
Table 3

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC14H10Cl2O3
M r 297.12
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)290
a, b, c (Å)10.831 (2), 4.4020 (5), 28.457 (5)
β (°)105.254 (6)
V3)1309.0 (4)
Z 4
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)0.50
Crystal size (mm)0.30 × 0.28 × 0.25
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2006)
T min, T max 0.862, 0.906
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections2940, 2298, 2232
R int 0.032
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.595
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.061, 0.215, 1.09
No. of reflections2298
No. of parameters174
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.30, −0.25

Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2006 ▸), SAINT (Bruker, 2006 ▸), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▸), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018012173/qm2127sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018012173/qm2127Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018012173/qm2127Isup3.cml CCDC reference: 1852049 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C14H10Cl2O3F(000) = 608
Mr = 297.12Dx = 1.508 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 10.831 (2) ÅCell parameters from 3210 reflections
b = 4.4020 (5) Åθ = 2.7–25.0°
c = 28.457 (5) ŵ = 0.50 mm1
β = 105.254 (6)°T = 290 K
V = 1309.0 (4) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.30 × 0.28 × 0.25 mm
Bruker APEXII diffractometer2298 independent reflections
Radiation source: graphite2232 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Detector resolution: 0.820 pixels mm-1Rint = 0.032
SAINT (Bruker, 2006) scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2006)h = −12→12
Tmin = 0.862, Tmax = 0.906k = −5→4
2940 measured reflectionsl = −33→33
Refinement on F20 restraints
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.061H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.215w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1367P)2 + 0.3086P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.09(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
2298 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.30 e Å3
174 parametersΔρmin = −0.25 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.2523 (3)−0.4421 (6)−0.16266 (9)0.0723 (9)
C20.1549 (5)−0.6402 (10)−0.18009 (16)0.0753 (13)
C30.1426 (5)−0.6924 (10)−0.22703 (16)0.0762 (13)
H30.082501−0.819559−0.2469990.091*
C40.2352 (5)−0.5237 (9)−0.24105 (13)0.0707 (12)
H40.248630−0.517334−0.2720060.085*
C50.3028 (5)−0.3696 (9)−0.20109 (13)0.0657 (12)
C60.0879 (6)−0.7575 (13)−0.1441 (2)0.1026 (19)
H6A0.020336−0.892412−0.1601500.154*
H6B0.052540−0.590266−0.1302710.154*
H6C0.147806−0.865048−0.1186450.154*
C70.4044 (4)−0.1635 (8)−0.19346 (13)0.0640 (11)
H70.433954−0.117117−0.2204900.077*
C80.4640 (4)−0.0255 (8)−0.15184 (12)0.0650 (11)
H80.438851−0.064204−0.1235900.078*
C90.5671 (4)0.1829 (8)−0.15071 (12)0.0614 (11)
O100.5944 (3)0.2504 (7)−0.18937 (9)0.0766 (10)
C110.6450 (4)0.3207 (8)−0.10472 (12)0.0612 (11)
C120.6189 (5)0.2587 (9)−0.05990 (13)0.0688 (12)
H120.5509050.132823−0.0585350.083*
C130.6944 (5)0.3854 (11)−0.01815 (13)0.0777 (14)
C140.7946 (5)0.5709 (10)−0.01895 (13)0.0773 (14)
H140.8451720.6531560.0098160.093*
C150.8201 (5)0.6350 (9)−0.06256 (14)0.0683 (12)
C160.7460 (4)0.5130 (9)−0.10592 (12)0.0628 (11)
O170.7747 (3)0.5862 (7)−0.14744 (9)0.0786 (9)
H170.7242560.502456−0.1703700.118*
Cl180.94733 (14)0.8606 (3)−0.06462 (4)0.0898 (6)
Cl190.66403 (17)0.3052 (4)0.03742 (4)0.1139 (7)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.081 (3)0.0853 (18)0.0574 (15)−0.0008 (16)0.0296 (13)−0.0014 (12)
C20.073 (4)0.080 (3)0.076 (3)−0.001 (2)0.025 (2)0.000 (2)
C30.072 (4)0.080 (3)0.073 (3)−0.002 (2)0.012 (2)−0.0048 (19)
C40.075 (4)0.079 (2)0.057 (2)0.000 (2)0.0147 (18)−0.0015 (17)
C50.072 (4)0.074 (2)0.053 (2)0.012 (2)0.0199 (17)0.0040 (15)
C60.101 (6)0.114 (4)0.108 (4)−0.012 (3)0.055 (3)0.003 (3)
C70.066 (4)0.073 (2)0.054 (2)0.005 (2)0.0184 (17)0.0058 (15)
C80.077 (4)0.071 (2)0.0495 (19)0.002 (2)0.0218 (17)0.0082 (15)
C90.070 (4)0.069 (2)0.0466 (19)0.0047 (19)0.0188 (17)0.0031 (14)
O100.090 (3)0.0963 (19)0.0489 (15)−0.0065 (16)0.0272 (13)0.0015 (12)
C110.062 (3)0.076 (2)0.0471 (19)0.0067 (19)0.0168 (16)0.0021 (15)
C120.074 (4)0.085 (2)0.049 (2)−0.005 (2)0.0183 (17)0.0051 (17)
C130.092 (4)0.095 (3)0.050 (2)−0.001 (3)0.025 (2)0.0022 (19)
C140.088 (4)0.089 (3)0.052 (2)−0.001 (3)0.0136 (19)−0.0048 (18)
C150.071 (4)0.073 (2)0.062 (2)−0.002 (2)0.0202 (19)−0.0013 (17)
C160.061 (3)0.076 (2)0.0537 (19)0.004 (2)0.0202 (16)0.0046 (16)
O170.086 (3)0.0982 (19)0.0562 (15)−0.0112 (17)0.0270 (13)0.0045 (13)
Cl180.0900 (14)0.0995 (9)0.0818 (8)−0.0179 (7)0.0260 (6)−0.0063 (5)
Cl190.1348 (17)0.1627 (14)0.0488 (7)−0.0341 (10)0.0326 (7)−0.0011 (6)
O1—C21.358 (6)C8—H80.9300
O1—C51.382 (5)C9—O101.248 (4)
C2—C31.327 (6)C9—C111.487 (5)
C2—C61.495 (6)C11—C161.390 (6)
C3—C41.389 (7)C11—C121.404 (5)
C3—H30.9300C12—C131.372 (6)
C4—C51.361 (5)C12—H120.9300
C4—H40.9300C13—C141.363 (6)
C5—C71.399 (6)C13—Cl191.734 (4)
C6—H6A0.9600C14—C151.370 (5)
C6—H6B0.9600C14—H140.9300
C6—H6C0.9600C15—C161.391 (5)
C7—C81.337 (5)C15—Cl181.712 (5)
C7—H70.9300C16—O171.338 (4)
C8—C91.439 (6)O17—H170.8200
C2—O1—C5106.9 (3)C9—C8—H8120.0
C3—C2—O1110.0 (4)O10—C9—C8119.6 (3)
C3—C2—C6133.8 (5)O10—C9—C11117.9 (4)
O1—C2—C6116.2 (4)C8—C9—C11122.5 (3)
C2—C3—C4107.9 (4)C16—C11—C12119.3 (3)
C2—C3—H3126.0C16—C11—C9119.7 (3)
C4—C3—H3126.0C12—C11—C9121.1 (4)
C5—C4—C3107.3 (4)C13—C12—C11119.4 (4)
C5—C4—H4126.4C13—C12—H12120.3
C3—C4—H4126.4C11—C12—H12120.3
C4—C5—O1108.0 (4)C14—C13—C12121.7 (4)
C4—C5—C7133.0 (4)C14—C13—Cl19118.7 (3)
O1—C5—C7119.1 (3)C12—C13—Cl19119.6 (4)
C2—C6—H6A109.5C13—C14—C15119.3 (4)
C2—C6—H6B109.5C13—C14—H14120.3
H6A—C6—H6B109.5C15—C14—H14120.3
C2—C6—H6C109.5C14—C15—C16121.1 (4)
H6A—C6—H6C109.5C14—C15—Cl18120.4 (3)
H6B—C6—H6C109.5C16—C15—Cl18118.4 (3)
C8—C7—C5127.5 (4)O17—C16—C11122.4 (3)
C8—C7—H7116.2O17—C16—C15118.4 (4)
C5—C7—H7116.2C11—C16—C15119.2 (3)
C7—C8—C9120.0 (3)C16—O17—H17109.5
C7—C8—H8120.0
C5—O1—C2—C3−0.2 (5)C8—C9—C11—C12−1.7 (6)
C5—O1—C2—C6178.3 (4)C16—C11—C12—C13−0.9 (6)
O1—C2—C3—C40.1 (6)C9—C11—C12—C13178.7 (4)
C6—C2—C3—C4−178.0 (6)C11—C12—C13—C140.1 (7)
C2—C3—C4—C5−0.1 (5)C11—C12—C13—Cl19−179.1 (3)
C3—C4—C5—O10.0 (5)C12—C13—C14—C150.6 (7)
C3—C4—C5—C7−178.7 (5)Cl19—C13—C14—C15179.7 (3)
C2—O1—C5—C40.1 (5)C13—C14—C15—C16−0.3 (7)
C2—O1—C5—C7179.0 (4)C13—C14—C15—Cl18−178.6 (4)
C4—C5—C7—C8−179.8 (4)C12—C11—C16—O17−178.7 (4)
O1—C5—C7—C81.6 (7)C9—C11—C16—O171.6 (6)
C5—C7—C8—C9−179.6 (4)C12—C11—C16—C151.2 (6)
C7—C8—C9—O105.1 (6)C9—C11—C16—C15−178.5 (4)
C7—C8—C9—C11−174.1 (4)C14—C15—C16—O17179.4 (4)
O10—C9—C11—C16−1.2 (6)Cl18—C15—C16—O17−2.3 (6)
C8—C9—C11—C16178.0 (4)C14—C15—C16—C11−0.6 (7)
O10—C9—C11—C12179.1 (4)Cl18—C15—C16—C11177.8 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O17—H17···O100.821.762.489 (4)147
C4—H4···O10i0.932.543.272 (6)135
C7—H7···O10i0.932.573.359 (4)143
  9 in total

1.  Novel tools for visualizing and exploring intermolecular interactions in molecular crystals.

Authors:  Joshua J McKinnon; Mark A Spackman; Anthony S Mitchell
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  2004-11-11

Review 2.  Bioavailability of chalcones.

Authors:  E Hijova
Journal:  Bratisl Lek Listy       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.278

3.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  Heme oxygenase 1 mediates anti-inflammatory effects of 2',4',6'-tris(methoxymethoxy) chalcone.

Authors:  Sung Hee Lee; Geom Seog Seo; Ji Yeong Kim; Xing Yu Jin; Hee-Doo Kim; Dong Hwan Sohn
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 4.432

5.  Synthesis and cytotoxic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-oxidant activities of 2',5'-dialkoxylchalcones as cancer chemopreventive agents.

Authors:  Jen-Hao Cheng; Chi-Feng Hung; Shyh-Chyun Yang; Jih-Pyang Wang; Shen-Jeu Won; Chun-Nan Lin
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Synthesis and antihyperglycemic activity of chalcone based aryloxypropanolamines.

Authors:  M Satyanarayana; Priti Tiwari; Brajendra K Tripathi; A K Srivastava; Ram Pratap
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  (E)-3-(2-Fur-yl)-1-(2-hydroxy-phen-yl)prop-2-en-1-one.

Authors:  Lingqian Kong; Yanhong Liu
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-10-22

8.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20

9.  The Cambridge Structural Database.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Ian J Bruno; Matthew P Lightfoot; Suzanna C Ward
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2016-04-01
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  X-ray structure, hirshfeld surfaces and interaction energy studies of 2,2-diphenyl-1-oxa-3-oxonia-2-boratanaphthalene.

Authors:  N R Sreenatha; D P Ganesha; A S Jeevan Chakravarthy; B Suchithra; B N Lakshminarayana
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-08-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.