Awareness and practice about the association between periodontal diseases and diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study in Western Saudi Arabia among health care providers.

PURPOSE: This study aims to assess the awareness and practices of dental and medical practitioners regarding the bidirectional relationship between periodontal diseases and diabetes mellitus. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of randomly selected dentists and physicians practicing in Jeddah. Participants were asked several questions concerning their awareness and practices on periodontal complications, and the bidirectional link between periodontal diseases and diabetes mellitus (DM).
RESULTS: A total of 560 general practitioners (284 dentists and 276 physicians) participated in the study. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding any sociodemographic characteristics. Overall, the awareness of all participants was low in all aspects. Moreover, dentists' awareness and practices were significantly better than physicians as majority of the questions were about the association between periodontal diseases and DM.
CONCLUSION: The awareness and practices about the link between periodontal diseases and DM should be improved among dental and medical practitioners to effectively prevent and control periodontal diseases and DM.

Introduction

Approximately 285 million people globally are afflicted with diabetes, and as such the rate of incidence is expected to show a steady increase over the years. It has been documented in several studies pertaining to the conduction of global surveys that diabetes presents as a major public health care concern across every race, having an epidemic spread and a rapidly increasing prevalence.1–7 With regard to Saudi Arabia, it was noted that the overall prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) for both males and females residing in rural and urban communities was 23.7%, with percentages of 26.2% and 21.5% for males and females, respectively.8

It is also well established that diabetes is a risk factor for periodontal diseases, and there is a bidirectional relationship between DM and the onset of periodontal diseases.9,10 Certain studies have indicated a greater susceptibility of diabetic patients toward severe forms of periodontal destruction. These studies further highlighted that effective treatment of periodontitis was strongly linked to enhancements in glycemic control.11–13 However, there is a lack of awareness among dental and medical practitioners with regard to the strong association between DM and the onset of periodontal diseases among the diabetic population.14 Owing to this, there is a corresponding lack of awareness among diabetic patients in this regard, which thus has an adverse effect on their oral health and overall quality of life.

As discussed earlier, there is an ever-increasing prevalence of DM among the Saudi population. Subsequently, it follows that such increased prevalence of DM would be associated with an increasing prevalence of periodontal diseases among the Saudi diabetic population. However, there have been no studies conducted to determine the levels of awareness among dental and medical practitioners within Saudi Arabia regarding the association between DM and periodontal diseases. A recent publication indicated that none of the investigated patients had ever been advised by their physicians to brush their teeth and that only 5.2% had been recommended by a physician to see their dentist regularly.15 These results indicated a huge negligence among physicians related to the influence of periodontal health on glycemic control of diabetic patients. Therefore, there was an urgent need to investigate clinicians’ awareness and practices pertaining to this relevant issue, so that educational awareness programs and an integrated practice structure may be devised for the prevention and effective management of periodontal diseases in Saudi diabetic patients.

This study was conducted with the aim of investigating the levels of awareness and practices of dental and medical practitioners with regard to the effects of DM on periodontal health within the Saudi diabetic population. It is to be noted that this is the first study that has been conducted with regard to investigating the awareness levels among dental and medical practitioners that operate in Saudi Arabia.

Materials and methods

This was a cross-sectional descriptive survey of 800 randomly selected dentists and physicians, working in different public and private health care services in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The study was conducted from November 2016 to November 2017. The participants of the study were investigated through the use of an anonymous, self-administered, and structured questionnaire that was reviewed for appropriate wording by experienced academics at King Abdulaziz University. Subsequently, the questionnaire was piloted on 30 patients to determine the time required and readability.

Prior to the commencement of the project, the study protocol was approved by Research Ethics Committee of King Abdulaziz University Faculty of Dentistry. Ethical approval (number 005-16) was accepted by the committee to take verbal consent from the participants, and the study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. This study made use of voluntary participation, where informed verbal consent was obtained from each participant prior to their contribution. Before the initiation of the investigation, a brief explanation of the project and its focal objectives were provided to the participants. The questionnaire was validated by the Research Ethics Committee of King Abdulaziz University Faculty of Dentistry.

Participants were then asked to complete four parts of a questionnaire. The first part recorded the demographic characteristics of participants including age, sex, level of education, specialties, and number of years in practice. In the second part, participants were asked questions to determine their awareness of several periodontal complications that diabetic patients are more susceptible to. These complications were inclusive of gingival inflammation, gingival bleeding, gingival recession, alveolar bone resorption, tooth loss, tooth mobility, and periodontal abscess.

The third part of the questionnaire concerned the practices of participants regarding oral health advice for patients with diabetes including the importance of regular dental check-ups, the necessity of more frequent dental check-ups for patients with poorly controlled diabetes, and the need of more frequent dental scaling than others without diabetes. In the fourth and final part of the questionnaire, all participants were requested to report their awareness about diabetes and its effect on periodontal health and whether a periodontal status might affect the metabolic control of diabetic patients. For all of the questions in the second, third, and fourth sections, participants were given the choice of “yes,” “no,” or “I do not know.”

Data was entered into the statistical package SPSS 22.00 for windows (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). To simplify the results, some responses were grouped as correct and incorrect answers. Descriptive statistics in the form of frequency distribution were performed for all study variables. A chi-squared test was calculated to detect significant associations among categorical variables. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed to examine which factors were significant in a multivariate analysis after adjusting for confounding among effects. The regression model used the dependent variable awareness score calculated in the following manner: items scores were summed up and categorized into good–fair (≥ median) and poor < median. Independent variables entered in the model were age, gender, level of education specialty, and profession (dentist or physician). Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.

Results

A total of 800 health care providers were contacted to participate. Only 560 health care providers (284 dentists and 276 physicians) responded, leading to a response rate of 70%. The mean age for dentists was 32.78 years, SD 7.54. The mean age of physicians was 32.03 years, SD 7.76. Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics of participating health care providers. No statistical differences were detected between dentists and physicians regarding any demographic characteristic studied (age, gender, level of education, and years of experience). Table 2 shows participants’ awareness to different periodontal complications associated with DM. Overall, the dentists reported better awareness levels than the physicians in the different items of periodontal complication except for gingival inflammation which showed no statistically significant difference in the awareness level (P<0.05).

Table 1

Demographic characteristics of participants

Characteristics	Dentist, N (%)	Physician, N (%)	χ2	P-value
Age (years)				0.439
≤30	99 (34.9)	108 (39.1)
>30–40	143 (50.4%)	120 (43.5)	2.706
>40–50	32 (11.3	36 (13.0)
>50	10 (3.5)	12 (4.3)
Gender				0.077
Male	197 (70.1)	214 (76.7)	3.12
Female	84 (29.9)	65 (23.3)
Levels of education				0.056
General practitioners	147 (51.8)	165 (59.8)	3.65
Specialists	137 (48.2)	111 (40.2)
Years of experience				0.256
<5 years	198 (69.7)	180 (65.2)	1.293
≥5 years	86 (30.3)	96 (34.8)

Table 2

Comparison between dentists and physicians regarding their awareness of periodontal complications

Periodontal complications	Yes		χ2	P-value
	Dentist, N (%)	Physician, N (%)
Gingival inflammation	253 (90.0)	259 (92.5)	51.058	0.301
Gingival bleeding	237 (83.5)	168 (60.9)	51.688	<0.001a
Gingival recession	228 (80.3)	144 (52.2)	71.401	<0.001a
Alveolar bone resorption	269 (94.7)	180 (65.2)	81.607	<0.001a
Tooth loss	256 (90.1)	216 (78.3)	54.137	<0.001a
Tooth mobility	271 (95.4)	192 (69.6)	68.997	<0.001a
Periodontal abscess	211 (74.3)	240 (87.0)	17.860	<0.001a

Note:

Significance level at P<0.05.

The comparison between participants’ regarding their self-reported practices to patients diagnosed with diabetes are presented in Table 3. It was seen that the majority of participants (98.9% dentists and all physicians 100%) instructed their diabetic patients to have regular dental check-ups, especially for patients with poorly controlled diabetes (dentists 93% and physicians 82.6%) (P<0.05). Dentist responses were noted to be significantly higher than physician responses. However, the response was noted to be generally low with regard to professional dental scaling. Nevertheless, as compared to physicians, a significantly higher number of dentists provided more frequent dental scaling to diabetic patients than individuals without diabetes (diabetes 63%, physicians 51.8%) (P<0.05). It was noted that there was a low level of awareness regarding the administration of prophylactic antibiotics to diabetic patients. However, this awareness level was still noted to be at a higher level for dentists as compared to the physicians (dentists 33.1%, physicians 30.4%) (P<0.005).

Table 3

Comparison between dentists and physicians regarding their self-reported practices for patients with DM

Statements	Dentists’ responses		Physicians’ responses		χ2	P-value
	Yes, N (%)	No, N (%)	Yes, N (%)	No, N (%)
I instruct diabetic patients to have regular dental check-ups	281 (98.9)	3 (1.1)	276 (100)	0 (0)	2.931	0.087
I instruct poorly controlled diabetic patients to have more frequent dental check-ups	264 (93.0)	20 (7.0)	228 (82.6)	48 (17.3)	40.528	<0.001a
I do not give diabetic patients more frequent dental scaling than individuals without diabetes	179 (63.0)	105 (37.0)	144 (52.2)	132 (51.8)	31.169	<0.001a

Note:

Significance level at P<0.05.

Table 4 presents dentists’ and physicians’ awareness regarding the association between periodontal diseases and DM. Both dentists and physicians were aware that diabetes affects periodontal health, and there was no significant difference between both groups (dentists 96.8% and physicians 95.7%). However, the dentists were significantly more aware than physicians that there is a bidirectional relation between periodontal disease and diabetes (dentists 83.1% and physicians 65.2%) (P<0.05). Moreover, dentists were significantly more aware of the importance of educating patients regarding their periodontal health than physicians (dentists 97.5% and physicians 56.5%) (P<0.05). However, more than one-third of the participants were not aware of the effect of periodontal diseases on metabolic control and that the treatment of periodontal disease would result in the improvement of metabolic control in diabetic patients. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups.

Table 4

Comparison of dentists and physicians regarding their awareness of the association between DM and periodontal health

Items	Dentists’ responses		Physicians’ responses		χ2	P-value
	Yes, N (%)	No, N (%)	Yes, N (%)	No, N (%)
Diabetes affects periodontal health	275 (96.8)	9 (3.2)	264 (95.7)	12 (4.3)	17.421	0.463
Periodontal conditions would affect the metabolic control of diabetes	192 (67.6)	92 (32.4)	204 (73.9)	72 (26.0)	22.034	0.101
Treating your periodontal disease would improve the metabolic control of the diabetic patients	193 (68.0)	91 (32)	204 (73.9)	72 (26.1)	6.085	0.121
There is a bidirectional relationship between periodontal disease and diabetes	236 (83.1)	48 (16.9)	180 (65.2)	96 (34.7)	51.004	<0.001a
I do give my patients instruction about their periodontal health	277 (97.5)	7 (2.5)	156 (56.5)	120 (43.5)	145.244	<0.001a

Note:

Significance level at P<0.05.

Abbreviation: DM, diabetes mellitus.

Table 5 presents the binary logistic regression analysis of factors related to participant awareness and practices. Age and type of profession were the only significant variables associated with awareness levels. It was noted that older participants were three times less aware of periodontal complications than younger participants. Furthermore, the physicians were almost eight times less aware of periodontal complications than dentists (odds ratio [OR] =7.82; 95% CI: 5.21–11.79; P<0.001). Poor practices were noted to be more likely among older physicians and general practitioners. Furthermore, poor practices toward diabetic patients were noted to be more likely among older physicians compared to dentists (OR =1.52; 95% CI: 1.07–2.17; P=0.020). Moreover, poor practices were noted to be more likely among general practitioners as opposed to specialists (OR =0.64; 95% CI: 0.42–0.99; P=0.043). Regarding the awareness of the association between periodontal diseases and diabetes, it was noted that older participants were more likely to have poor awareness about the effect of periodontal diseases and diabetes. Furthermore, male participants were more likely to have poor awareness about the effect of periodontal diseases and diabetes (OR =2.35; 95% CI: 1.50–3.68; P<0.001).

Table 5

Logistic regression analysis of factors related to dentists and physicians awareness

Model	Variables	P-value	OR	95% CI for OR
				Lower	Upper
Awareness of periodontal complications (Model χ2=131.27, P<0.001)	Age (years)
	≤30a
	>30–40	0.448	0.83	0.51	1.35
	>40–50	0.003b	2.97	1.44	6.13
	>50	0.045b	3.21	1.03	10.04
	Males vs female	0.074	0.67	0.43	1.04
	Physician vs dentist	<0.001b	7.82	5.21	11.79
	Specialist vs GP	0.352	1.25	0.78	2.00
Practices with diabetic patients (Model χ2=35.98, P<0.001)	Age (years)
	≤30a
	>30–40	0.043b	0.63	0.41	0.99
	>40–50	0.039b	2.02	1.04	3.93
	>50	0.178	2.09	0.72	6.09
	Males vs female	0.136	1.36	0.91	2.04
	Physician vs dentist	0.020b	1.52	1.07	2.17
	Specialist vs GP	0.043b	0.64	0.42	0.99
Awareness of the association between periodontal disease and diabetes (Model χ2=74.02, P<0.001)	Age (years)
	≤30a
	>30–40	<0.001b	0.25	0.15	0.39
	>40–50	0.003b	0.35	0.17	0.70
	>50	0.004b	0.12	0.03	0.50
	Males vs female	<0.001b	2.35	1.50	3.68
	Physician vs dentist	0.120	1.34	0.93	1.95
	Specialist vs GP	0.970	0.99	0.63	1.57

Notes:

Reference category.

Significance level at P<0.05.

Abbreviation: OR, odds ratio.

Discussion

This study was conducted to establish the levels of awareness and practices among Saudi dental and medical practitioners with regard to the influence of diabetes on periodontal health and vice versa. Grounds for conducting this study were built on existing literature that comprehensively highlighted the strong association between DM and the occurrence of periodontal diseases.10,16–19 The International Diabetes Federation and World Dental Federation emphasized that there was a strong need for effective communication between practitioners and patients to foster a clear understanding of the relationship between DM and periodontal diseases.20 Improvement in awareness levels among practitioners in this regard would aid in their management of diabetic patients. However, it was seen that there was a general lack of awareness among medical and dental practitioners regarding this significant association, due to which supporting medical and dental practices could not be implemented for curbing the occurrence of periodontal diseases. Due to the lack of awareness among health care providers regarding this association, there was a corresponding lack of awareness among diabetic patients.14 As highlighted by similar studies conducted in Kuwait, there was a lower awareness level than desired among dental and medical practitioners regarding the bidirectional relationship between DM and periodontal diseases.14

This study assessed 560 medical and dental practitioners in Saudi Arabia to determine their awareness levels regarding a variety of periodontal complications associated with DM. The results of the binary regression analysis indicated that the level of awareness demonstrated by the dentists was relatively higher than that shown by the physicians. Specifically, the level of dentists’ awareness in this regard was 2.254 times greater than physician awareness. Additionally, it was seen that the physicians demonstrated lower awareness levels than dentists about specific periodontal complications, such as, alveolar bone resorption, gingival bleeding, and tooth bleeding. A causal factor contributing to this difference in awareness levels may be attributed to the differences between established medical and dental curricula. It was noted by existing research that while dental curricula make oral health a focal point of study, medical curricula are primarily concerned with studying systemic conditions.14 Furthermore, dentists may not effectively communicate with the physicians with regard to the diabetic patient’s oral health, due to which suitable assessments may not be made and preventative measures not be conducted. This issue was highlighted in a previous study, which reported that only 14% of the dentists in the Northeastern United States communicated with physicians regarding the diabetic patient’s oral health. Furthermore, the study highlighted the inactive role of dentists in the effective management of diabetic patients.21

Although dentist awareness was higher than physician awareness, the level of awareness demonstrated by the former was still low compared to the significant influence of diabetes on periodontal health. Specifically, the results obtained demonstrated that only half of the dentists that participated in this study were acquainted with the association between DM and periodontal diseases. It was additionally noted that although awareness regarding the administration of prophylactic antibiotics was relatively higher in dentists than in physicians, it was still at a low level overall. These results were in line with existing research, which highlighted that 51.0% of general dentists and 29.4% of periodontists in the Northeastern United States were low performers in terms of discussions with patients about the associations between diabetes and oral health.22 Furthermore, it was highlighted by previous research conducted by Bader et al23 that there is an urgent requirement for general dentists to improve their abilities regarding the recognition of diabetes as a high-risk indicator for periodontal diseases. Additionally, it was seen that the female dentists, who participated in this study, demonstrated relatively greater levels of awareness than their male counterparts. These results were in accordance with a study by Forbes et al,24 which demonstrated that female dentists were more likely than male dentists to refer diabetic patients for monitoring blood glucose, adjusting the frequency of dental visits and discussing how periodontal therapy affects metabolic control. The level of discussion and active management was significantly associated with the number of consultations with dental and medical specialists.

The primary area of concern noted by this study was the lack of effective collaboration between general dentists, dental specialists, and medical practitioners. A study by Lee et al25 highlighted the presence of a negative attitude among general dentists regarding periodontal referrals. The study discussed the presence of a directly proportional relationship between positive dentist perceptions regarding their own periodontal education and the level of their conversations about considering bone loss percentages as a basis for referral. Furthermore, the study highlighted the existence of a directly proportional relationship between positive dentist perceptions regarding their periodontal education and the frequency of their use of systemic antibiotics in the treatment of periodontal diseases. Since general dentists are considered to be the primary referral source of patients with advanced periodontal conditions, it is vital that periodontists educate these general practitioners about the risk of developing periodontal diseases in diabetic patients. Additionally, a questionnaire-based study by Ward et al26 examined the knowledge and attitudes of 137 primary care nurse practitioners regarding the periodontal disease–systemic link. The results obtained indicated that nurse practitioners were significantly more likely to screen patients when they experienced positive emotions regarding their training and education. Furthermore, the study suggested that these nurse practitioners were more likely to screen patients when they believed it was within their scope of practice to screen for periodontal diseases, and when they had control over the establishment of office protocols. These results support the importance of interprofessional and collaborative education among the medical, nursing, and dental professions.27

As discussed earlier, the ineffective dissemination of awareness pertaining to DM and periodontal diseases is a significant concern that needs to be addressed so that the awareness levels among medical and dental practitioners may be increased. In order to boost awareness levels regarding DM and periodontal complications, educational programs may be utilized for the health care providers. The results obtained additionally noted the prevalence of poor awareness among older physicians and dental practitioners. Therefore, it is essential that educational programs be devised so as to cater to enhancing the awareness levels of these older health care providers. Furthermore, an integrated practice structure should be established for the effective management of diabetic patients through instigating open channels of communication between dental and medical practitioners. In this way, suitable assessments of diabetic patient conditions may be made and preventative measures may be taken to curb the occurrence of periodontal diseases.

Additionally, it is important to consider that a large number of individuals may be unaware that they are afflicted with diabetes and may not receive a diagnosis until the development of complications, such as periodontal diseases. However, individuals with a self-reported family history of diabetes, hypertension, high cholesterol levels, and clinical evidence of periodontal diseases bear a probability of 27%–53% of having undiagnosed diabetes.28 Therefore, it is essential for dental and medical organizations to collaborate in screening for unidentified diabetes. Dentists, physicians, and other health care providers should provide accurate information to diabetic patients regarding the association between diabetes and oral health and encourage them to obtain oral health examinations and undergo the required treatments. This would act as a preventative measure against the development of periodontal diseases that arise as a result of diabetes.

The results of present study have helped in devising effective educational programs and integrative clinical practices to increase the level of awareness demonstrated by these health care providers and contribute to a culture of intellectual growth regarding this bidirectional relationship between DM and the onset of periodontal diseases. However, this study was based on self-reported data and utilized a low study sample set. Further studies should be conducted with a larger study sample set to obtain concrete results. Moreover, future studies are needed for demonstrating superior awareness levels to physicians as their awareness levels investigated in this study were still low as compared to the impact of DM on periodontal health.

Conclusion

This study conducted an evaluation of awareness levels regarding the relationship between DM and the onset of periodontal diseases among dental and medical practitioners in Saudi Arabia. It was seen that the awareness regarding specific periodontal complications associated with diabetes was lower with regard to this study sample. Although dentists demonstrated superior awareness levels compared with physicians, their awareness levels were still low as compared to the impact of DM on periodontal health. It is essential for dental and medical practitioners to comprehend the strong association between DM and periodontal diseases to be able to provide appropriate clinical evaluations and preventative measures against the occurrence of such complications in diabetic patients. Furthermore, educational programs should be conducted to raise the awareness levels of health care providers in this regard for the effective management of diabetic patients. Integrated clinical practices should be implemented with the aim of initiating open communication between dental and medical practitioners in this regard.