| Literature DB >> 30316725 |
Rathinasamy Baskaran1, Lohanathan Bharathi Priya2, V Sathish Kumar2, Viswanadha Vijaya Padma3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cadmium (Cd) pollution is of serious concern due to its toxic effects in both humans and animals. The study investigates the protective effect of Tinospora cordifolia stem methanolic extract (TCME) on Cd induced hepatotoxicity. OBJECTIVE(S): The objective of the study was to explore the hepatoprotective effects of T. cordifolia extract.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant; Cadmium; Hepatotoxicity; Oxidative stress; Tinospora cordifolia
Year: 2018 PMID: 30316725 PMCID: PMC6314239 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaim.2017.07.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ayurveda Integr Med ISSN: 0975-9476
Fig. 1Effect of TCME co-treatment on serum marker enzymes. (A) Aspartate transaminase (AST) (B) Alanine transaminase (ALT). Each bar represents the mean ± SE of six animals in each group. ***p < 0.001, compared to control, +++p < 0.001, compared to Cd treated group. #, not significant compared to control. (One way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison). Group I – Control, Group II – Cd, Group III – TCME, Group IV – Cd + TCME.
Fig. 2Histopathology of rat liver (hematoxylin and eosin staining, 100× magnification). (a) Control rats showing normal architecture of the liver (b) liver of Cd intoxicated rats (c) liver of TCME treated rats (d) liver of TCME and Cd co-administered rats.
Effect of T. cordifolia extract co-treatment with Cd on protein carbonyl contents, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant status of liver tissues.
| Parameters | Group I | Group II | Group III | Group IV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPO | 41.66 ± 1.5 | 65.92 ± 2.4∗∗∗ | 42.63 ± 1.64# | 55.44 ± 4.02+++ |
| PCC | 1.04 ± 0.07 | 1.47 ± 0.05∗∗∗ | 1.09 ± 0.09# | 1.32 ± 0.05+++ |
| GSH | 446.93 ± 0.59 | 382.47 ± 0.94∗∗∗ | 444.99 ± 0.83# | 423.84 ± 0.69+++ |
| SOD | 100 ± 1.06 | 84.04 ± 1.25∗∗∗ | 100.7 ± 0.93# | 94.83 ± 0.63+++ |
| CAT | 100 ± 1.21 | 80.73 ± 0.83∗∗∗ | 99.82 ± 1.62# | 89.72 ± 1.63+++ |
| GST | 100 ± 1.53 | 77.52 ± 1.32∗∗∗ | 99.26 ± 2.13# | 90.15 ± 1.21+++ |
| GPX | 100 ± 2.21 | 83.31 ± 2.01∗∗∗ | 100.05 ± 2.21# | 95.35 ± 1.05+++ |
Each bar represents the mean ± SE of six animals in each group. Units are expressed as follows: LPO – μmoles of TBA reactants/mg of protein, PCC – μmoles of pcc/mg of protein, GSH – μmoles/mg of protein. For SOD, CAT, GST, GPX, the specific activities of the enzymes were calculated as units/mg of protein and expressed as % relative activity by comparing with control. ***p < 0.001, compared to control, +++p < 0.001, compared to Cd treated group. #, not significant compared to control. (One way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison). Group I – Control, Group II – Cd, Group III – TCME, Group IV – Cd + TCME.
Effect of T. cordifolia extract on activities of the membrane bound ATPases.
| Membrane bound ATPases | Group I | Group II | Group III | Group IV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Na+K+ATPase | 7.45 ± 0.43 | 5.55 ± 0.28*** | 6.68 ± 0.18# | 6.32 ± 0.12+++ |
| Ca2+ATPase | 8.73 ± 0.06 | 6.20 ± 0.03*** | 8.77 ± 0.09# | 5.04 ± 0.05+++ |
| Mg2+ATPase | 5.12 ± 0.07 | 4.22 ± 0.02*** | 5.10 ± 0.04# | 4.80 ± 0.03+++ |
Table represents the mean ± SE of six animals in each group. Units are expressed as nmols of pi-liberated/mg of protein. ***p < 0.001, compared to control, +++p < 0.001, compared to Cd treated group. #, not significant compared to control. Group I – Control, Group II – Cd, Group III – TCME, Group IV – Cd + TCME. (One way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison).
Effect of T. cordifolia co-treatment on the tissue glycoprotein status.
| Glycoprotein | Group I | Group II | Group III | Group IV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hexose | 622.35 ± 22.13 | 396.25 ± 29.93∗∗∗ | 628.47 ± 4.94# | 482.69 ± 25.42+++ |
| Hexosamine | 324.28 ± 16.38 | 113.47 ± 18.72∗∗∗ | 332.39 ± 14.04# | 191.85 ± 10.81+++ |
| Fucose | 185.62 ± 5.07 | 176.81 ± 5.74∗∗∗ | 121.25 ± 9.56# | 106.346 ± 3.31+++ |
| Sialic acid | 528.91 ± 4.51 | 464.37 ± 6.16∗∗∗ | 531.08 ± 10.61# | 486.18 ± 8.19+++ |
Table represents the mean ± SE of six animals in each group. Units are expressed as μg/g of tissue ***p < 0.001, compared to control, +++p < 0.001, compared to Cd treated group. #, not significant compared to control. Group I – Control, Group II – Cd, Group III – TCME, Group IV – Cd + TCME. (One way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison).