| Literature DB >> 27330907 |
Babatunji Emmanuel Oyinloye1, Abiola Fatimah Adenowo2, Foluso Oluwagbemiga Osunsanmi2, Bolajoko Idiat Ogunyinka2, Sarah Onyenibe Nwozo3, Abidemi Paul Kappo2.
Abstract
In recent years, indigenous medicinal plants exhibiting diverse biological activities have been explored in the amelioration of hepatotoxicity. This study investigates the protective effect of Monodora myristica (MM) on cadmium-induced liver damage in experimental animals. Male Wistar albino rats were maintained on 200 mg/L cadmium: Cd (Cd as CdCl2) in the animals' main drinking water to induce hepatotoxicity. Added to this, the animals received aqueous extracts of MM at a dose of 200 or 400 and 20 mg/kg bw of Livolin forte (LF) for 21 days. At the end of the experiment, levels of serum enzyme biomarkers (alanine transaminase, alkaline phosphatase and aspartate transaminase) as well as total cholesterol (TC), triacylglyceride (TG) and malondialdehyde were significantly raised in the cadmium treated groups. Conversely, cadmium treatment elicited noticeable decrease in hepatic enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants (reduced glutathione: GSH, catalase: CAT, superoxide dismutase: SOD). Co-treatment with MM at varying doses as well as LF considerably decreased the elevated levels of the serum biomarkers as well as TC, TG and malondialdehyde in the cadmium-treated groups in a dose dependant manner. Additionally, MM exhibited reversal potential on cadmium-toxicity at the tested doses as its administration was accompanied by a pronounced increase in GSH, SOD, and CAT levels. Histopathological results were parallel to these findings. These results demonstrates that aqueous extracts of MM is effective in the amelioration of hepatic damages arising from cadmium-induced toxicity, indicating that the antioxidant bio-constituents of MM play an important role in the prevention of liver toxicity possibly by inhibiting bioaccumulation of free radicals in animal models.Entities:
Keywords: Cadmium; Hepatic enzyme; Livolin forte; Monodora myristica; Oxidative stress
Year: 2016 PMID: 27330907 PMCID: PMC4870522 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2228-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Results of the phytochemical screening of M. myristica
| Phytochemicals | Alkaloids | Saponins | Tannins | Flavonoids | Cardiac glycosides | Phenols |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aqueous extracts | ++ | ++ | + | +++ | ++ | +++ |
+, present in trace; ++, moderately present; +++, abundantly present
The effect of M. myristica of the levels of liver marker enzyme activities
| Treatment group | ALP activity (U/L) | ALT activity (U/L) | AST activity (U/L) |
|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | 110.37 ± 0.75b | 115.61 ± 1.21b | 121.25 ± 3.78a,c |
| G2 | 149.89 ± 0.44a | 156.50 ± 1.80a | 181.17 ± 5.20b |
| G3 | 120.04 ± 0.19 | 139.01 ± 3.79 | 169.82 ± 3.43a |
| G4 | 109.59 ± 0.61 | 104.12 ± 2.63 | 136.20 ± 1.57 |
| G5 | 98.62 ± 0.32a,b | 108.27 ± 0.13 | 127.27 ± 0.17 |
Values shown are mean ± SD (n = 6). Mean differences are significant (P < 0.05) when compared with: aG1 (control group), b G2 (cadmium only)
The effect of M. myristica on hepatic MDA, serum triglyceride and cholesterol levels
| Treatment group | MDA (nmole/mg/protein) | Triglyceride (mg/dL) | Cholesterol (mg/dL) |
|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | 38.93 ± 0.96b | 124.62 ± 2.23b,c | 87.22 ± 5.60b |
| G2 | 70.66 ± 1.77a | 175.11 ± 1.05a | 173.20 ± 1.35a |
| G3 | 51.75 ± 2.32 | 154.23 ± 3.14a | 111.20 ± 8.14a |
| G4 | 47.21 ± 2.21 | 139.05 ± 3.19 | 106.80 ± 6.27a |
| G5 | 40.82 ± 0.41 | 126.89 ± 1.69 | 109.77 ± 0.69a |
Values shown are mean ± SD (n = 6). Mean differences are significant (P < 0.05) when compared with: aG1 (control group), b G2 (cadmium only)
The effect of M. myristica on the levels of liver glutathione and activities of liver catalase and superoxide dismutase
| Treatment group | GSH (nmole/mg protein) | CAT (unit/min/mg protein) | SOD (unit/min/mg protein) |
|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | 36.42 ± 0.52b | 65.83 ± 5.43b | 27.04 ± 0.05b |
| G2 | 23.92 ± 0.37a | 42.73 ± 0.69a | 15.79 ± 0.06a |
| G3 | 37.78 ± 0.38 | 59.66 ± 0.65 | 24.99 ± 0.13 |
| G4 | 44.28 ± 0.40a | 64.31 ± 0.79 | 35.02 ± 0.08 |
| G5 | 41.74 ± 0.61a | 68.02 ± 0.18 | 31.37 ± 0.79 |
Values shown are mean ± SD (n = 6). Mean differences are significant (P < 0.05) when compared with: aG1 (control group), b G2 (cadmium only)
Fig. 1Histological examination of rat livers stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) (×400). a G1: showing no abnormal morphological alteration, b G2: showing extensive morphological disruption, c G3: showing moderate degeneration of hepatocytes and kupper cells, d G4: showing mild periportal hepatic necrosis hepatic, e G5: showing very mild degeneration of hepatocytes and kupper cells
| Groups | Treatment |
|---|---|
| G1 | Negative control (tap water only) |
| G2 | Positive control (cadmium water only) |
| G3 | Cadmium water + |
| G4 | Cadmium water + |
| G5 | Cadmium water + Livolin forte (20 mg/kg bw) |