Literature DB >> 30312199

Implications for Breast Cancer Restaging Based on the 8th Edition AJCC Staging Manual.

Jennifer K Plichta1,2, Yi Ren2,3, Samantha M Thomas2,3, Rachel A Greenup1,2, Oluwadamilola M Fayanju1,2, Laura H Rosenberger1,2, Terry Hyslop2,3, E Shelley Hwang1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the changes that have resulted from the latest breast cancer staging guidelines and the potential impact on prognosis.
BACKGROUND: Contemporary data suggest that combining anatomic staging and tumor biology yields a predictive synergy for determining breast cancer prognosis. This forms the basis for the American Joint Committee on Cancer's (AJCC) Staging Manual, 8th edition. We assessed the changes that have resulted from the new staging guidelines and the potential impact on prognosis.
METHODS: Women with stages I to III breast cancer from 2010 to 2014 in the National Cancer Data Base were pathologically staged according to the 7th and 8th editions of the AJCC Staging Manual. Patient characteristics and restaging outcomes were summarized. Unadjusted overall survival (OS) was estimated, and differences were assessed. Cox proportional-hazards models were utilized to estimate the adjusted association of stage with OS.
RESULTS: After restaging the 493,854 women identified, 6.8% were upstaged and 29.7% were downstaged. The stage changes varied by tumor histology, receptor status, tumor grade, and Oncotype DX scores (all P < 0.0001). Applying the 8th edition criteria yielded an incremental reduction in survival for each increase in stage, which was not consistently seen in the 7th edition. In a subgroup analysis based on hormone receptor (HR) status, those with stages II and III, and HR- disease had a worse OS than those with HR+ disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Applying the 8th edition staging criteria resulted in a stage change for >35% of patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer and refined OS estimates. Overall, the transition to the 8th edition is expected to better drive clinical care, treatment recommendations, and future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 30312199      PMCID: PMC6588495          DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   13.787


  19 in total

1.  HER-2/neu gene amplification characterized by fluorescence in situ hybridization: poor prognosis in node-negative breast carcinomas.

Authors:  M F Press; L Bernstein; P A Thomas; L F Meisner; J Y Zhou; Y Ma; G Hung; R A Robinson; C Harris; A El-Naggar; D J Slamon; R N Phillips; J S Ross; S R Wolman; K J Flom
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  The Neo-Bioscore Update for Staging Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Incorporation of Prognostic Biologic Factors Into Staging After Treatment.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Jose Vila; Susan L Tucker; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Benjamin D Smith; W Fraser Symmans; Aysegul A Sahin; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 31.777

3.  Novel staging system for predicting disease-specific survival in patients with breast cancer treated with surgery as the first intervention: time to modify the current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system.

Authors:  Min Yi; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Janice N Cormier; Thomas A Buchholz; Karl Bilimoria; Aysegul A Sahin; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo; Sheng Luo; Aman U Buzdar; Jaime R Crow; Henry M Kuerer; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis.

Authors:  Patricia Cortazar; Lijun Zhang; Michael Untch; Keyur Mehta; Joseph P Costantino; Norman Wolmark; Hervé Bonnefoi; David Cameron; Luca Gianni; Pinuccia Valagussa; Sandra M Swain; Tatiana Prowell; Sibylle Loibl; D Lawrence Wickerham; Jan Bogaerts; Jose Baselga; Charles Perou; Gideon Blumenthal; Jens Blohmer; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Jonas Bergh; Vladimir Semiglazov; Robert Justice; Holger Eidtmann; Soonmyung Paik; Martine Piccart; Rajeshwari Sridhara; Peter A Fasching; Leen Slaets; Shenghui Tang; Bernd Gerber; Charles E Geyer; Richard Pazdur; Nina Ditsch; Priya Rastogi; Wolfgang Eiermann; Gunter von Minckwitz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene.

Authors:  D J Slamon; G M Clark; S G Wong; W J Levin; A Ullrich; W L McGuire
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-01-09       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Her-2/neu expression in node-negative breast cancer: direct tissue quantitation by computerized image analysis and association of overexpression with increased risk of recurrent disease.

Authors:  M F Press; M C Pike; V R Chazin; G Hung; J A Udove; M Markowicz; J Danyluk; W Godolphin; M Sliwkowski; R Akita
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1993-10-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Prognostic importance of c-erbB-2 expression in breast cancer. International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  B A Gusterson; R D Gelber; A Goldhirsch; K N Price; J Säve-Söderborgh; R Anbazhagan; J Styles; C M Rudenstam; R Golouh; R Reed
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Prognostic factors of breast recurrence in the conservative management of early breast cancer: a 25-year follow-up.

Authors:  A Fourquet; F Campana; B Zafrani; V Mosseri; P Vielh; J C Durand; J R Vilcoq
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Prospective Validation of a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Joseph A Sparano; Robert J Gray; Della F Makower; Kathleen I Pritchard; Kathy S Albain; Daniel F Hayes; Charles E Geyer; Elizabeth C Dees; Edith A Perez; John A Olson; JoAnne Zujewski; Tracy Lively; Sunil S Badve; Thomas J Saphner; Lynne I Wagner; Timothy J Whelan; Matthew J Ellis; Soonmyung Paik; William C Wood; Peter Ravdin; Maccon M Keane; Henry L Gomez Moreno; Pavan S Reddy; Timothy F Goggins; Ingrid A Mayer; Adam M Brufsky; Deborah L Toppmeyer; Virginia G Kaklamani; James N Atkins; Jeffrey L Berenberg; George W Sledge
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-09-27       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Validation Study of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition Prognostic Stage Compared With the Anatomic Stage in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Anna Weiss; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Daphne Y Lichtensztajn; Min Yi; Audree Tadros; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Sharon H Giordano; Kelly K Hunt; Elizabeth A Mittendorf
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 31.777

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  The current status of the clinical utility of liquid biopsies in cancer.

Authors:  Anson Snow; Denaly Chen; Julie E Lang
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2019-09-08       Impact factor: 5.225

2.  Circulating Tumor Cells and Breast Cancer: The Long and Winding Road Behind and Before Us.

Authors:  Jennifer K Plichta
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Expanding the Staging Criteria for T1-2N0 Hormone-Receptor Positive Breast Cancer Patients Enrolled in TAILORx.

Authors:  Olga Kantor; Harold J Burstein; Tari A King; Steven Shak; Christy A Russell; Armando E Giuliano; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Eric P Winer; Larissa A Korde; Joseph A Sparano; Elizabeth A Mittendorf
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.339

4.  Stealth Liposomal Chemotherapeutic Agent for Triple Negative Breast Cancer with Improved Pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Nagavendra Kommineni; David Paul; Raju Saka; Wahid Khan; Satheeshkumar Nanjappan
Journal:  Nanotheranostics       Date:  2022-08-21

5.  Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Women with Breast Cancer and Supraclavicular Nodal Metastases.

Authors:  Nina P Tamirisa; Yi Ren; Brittany M Campbell; Samantha M Thomas; Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Jennifer K Plichta; Laura H Rosenberger; Jeremy Force; Terry Hyslop; E Shelley Hwang; Rachel A Greenup
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Expanding Criteria for Prognostic Stage IA in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Olga Kantor; Tari A King; Steven Shak; Christy A Russell; Armando E Giuliano; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Harold J Burstein; Eric P Winer; Tanujit Dey; Joseph A Sparano; Elizabeth A Mittendorf
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Validation of the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Pathological Prognostic Staging for young breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Juan Zhou; Jian Lei; Jun Wang; Chen-Lu Lian; Li Hua; Li-Chao Yang; San-Gang Wu
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 5.682

Review 8.  Artificial intelligence in breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Ge-Ge Wu; Li-Qiang Zhou; Jian-Wei Xu; Jia-Yu Wang; Qi Wei; You-Bin Deng; Xin-Wu Cui; Christoph F Dietrich
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2019-02-28

9.  Association between the degree of fibrosis in fibrotic focus and the unfavorable clinicopathological prognostic features of breast cancer.

Authors:  Yongfu Li; Yuhan Wei; Wenjun Tang; Jingru Luo; Minghua Wang; Haifeng Lin; Hong Guo; Yuling Ma; Jun Zhang; Qin Li
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Evaluation of the 8th edition of the American joint committee on cancer's pathological staging system in prognosis assessment and treatment decision making for stage T1-2N1 breast cancer after mastectomy.

Authors:  San-Gang Wu; Jun Wang; Chen-Lu Lian; Jian Lei; Li Hua; Qin Lin; Yong-Xiong Chen; Zhen-Yu He
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.