| Literature DB >> 30310830 |
M Moreno1, A Zacarias2, L Velasquez3,4, G Gonzalez5,6, M Alegría-Arcos7,8, F Gonzalez-Nilo7, E K U Gross2.
Abstract
Here we report the IR spectra of FeEnterobactin in catecholate conformations ([CatFeEB]3-) obtained by DFT calculations using PBE/QZVP and their correlation it with its experimental counterpart [SalH3FeEB]0. Fragments of FeEnterobactin and Enterobactin (H6EB) are elucidated from their MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, and the dependence of the frontier orbitals (HOMO and LUMO) with the catecholamide dihedral angles of H6EB is reported. The frequency distribution of catecholamide dihedral angle of H6EB was carried-out using molecular dynamics (MD). The data presented enriches the understanding of [CatFeEB]3 - and H6EB frequency distribution and reactivity.Entities:
Keywords: Catecholate FeEnterobactin; DFT; FTIR; MD
Year: 2018 PMID: 30310830 PMCID: PMC6178210 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.08.114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Fig. 1Calculated [CatFeEB]3− IR spectra using PBE/QZVP method and Experimental [SalFeH3EB]0 in the range of 4000–450 cm−1. [CatFeEB]3− corresponds to Fe linked at catechol groups, and [SalFeH3EB]0 to Fe at catecholamide groups respectively.
Fig. 2H6EB fragments based on MALDI-TOF MS spectra [1], calculated using minimum and maximum atomic weights (ma) from the IUPAC 2013 technical report [12], and Mm (monoisotopic mass) [16]. ma(H)= [1.00784, 1.00811]; ma(C)[12.0096, 12.0116], ma(N)[14.00643, 14.00728], ma(O)[15.99903, 15.99977] and ma(Na)[22.98977] were considered in the estimation of minimum and maximum molecular weights (Mw), and Mm was calculated using web tool provides by http://www.cheminfo.org. Being the average of the mass measurement error (or accuracy) of Δm:33.031 ppm (0.0033%) [16].
Fig. 3CatFeEnterobactin (CatFeEB) and SalFeH3Enterobactin (FeH3EB) fragments based on MALDI-TOF MS spectra [1], calculated using minimum and maximum atomic weights (ma) from the IUPAC 2013 technical report [12] and monoisotopic mass Mm [16]. ma(H)= [1.00784, 1.00811]; ma(C)[12.0096, 12.0116], ma(N)[14.00643, 14.00728], ma(O)[15.99903, 15.99977], ma(Na)[22.98977] and ma(Fe)[55.845] were considered in the estimation of minimum and maximum molecular weights (Mw), and Mm was calculated using web tool provides by http://www.cheminfo.org. Being the average of the mass measurement error (or accuracy) of Δm:11.625 ppm (0.0011%) [16].
Fig. 4Dihedral angles of structure-2 arms (g) as a function of time (a-c) and frequency distribution (d-f).
Fig. 5Dihedral angles of structure-3 arms (g) as a function of time (a-c) and frequency distribution (d-f).
Fig. 6Dihedral angles of structure-4 arms (g) as a function of time (a-c) and frequency distribution (d-f).
Fig. 7Dihedral angles of structure-5 arms (g) as a function of time (a-c) and frequency distribution (d-f).
Fig. 8Frontier Orbitals (HOMO-LUMO) of structure 1(a), structure-2(b), structure-3(c), structure-4(d) and structure-5(e).
| Subject area | Chemistry and biology. |
| More specific subject area | Synthesis, Functionalization, and Characterization of FeEnterobactin and Enterobactin, IR spectra, catecholamide dihedral angles distribution and reactivity. |
| Type of data | Plots were done with Origin 6.0 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA). We used Gauss-View to visualize the frontier orbitals, density, electrostatic potentials and vibrational modes. |
| How data was acquired | DFT calculations using PBE exchange/correlation functionals and QZVP basis set were used to obtain the infrared spectra (IR) of [SalFeH3EB]0 and H6EB. Experimental IR were recorded on a Brucker IFS66v/S vacuum FTIR spectrometer with a Ge/KBr beam splitter and DTGS detector, and the MALDI-TOF MS spectra were acquired with an Ultraflex II TOF-TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics) for both samples (more details in |
| Data format | Figs. in TIF format. |
| Experimental factors | Experimental IR were recorded at 50000 scans with 2 cm−1 resolution. The sample, [SalFeH3EB]0 were prepared using KRS-5 disc. fifty milligrams of [SalFeH3EB]0 and H6EB, separately, was dispersed in 100 µl of dichloromethane, then one drop was placed on a KRS-5 disc to dry. Solid [SalFeH3EB]0 was characterized. All solvents were of analytical purity. For the sample preparation of MALDI-TOF MS spectra, 0.5 mL of a saturated solution of a-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (HCCA) in acetone was deposited on the sample target. A 1 ml aliquot of the sample was injected into a small drop of water previously deposited on the matrix surface |
| Experimental features | Infrared Spectra of [SalFeH3EB]0 was carried out on solid state at RT, instead, a liquid state is performed to capture MALDI-TOF MS spectra. |
| Data source location | Theory and Experimental II departments of the Max Planck Institute of Microstructure Physics, Halle/Germany. Universidad Andres Bello, Facultad de Ciencias Biologicas, Center for Bioinformatic and Integrative Biology (CBIB). |
| Data accessibility | Data described here are |
| Related research article | Major details about Enterobactin IR spectra can be found in “IR and NMR Spectroscopic Correlation of Enterobactin by DFT” Spectrochimica Acta A (2018) |
| The Functionalization and characterization of Enterobactin and Fe Enterobactin analogs as well as their affinity prediction with FepA-protein transmembrane using DFT, Molecular Dynamics and Docking will be reported elsewhere. |