Iron is required for virulence of most bacterial pathogens, many of which rely on siderophores, small-molecule chelators, to scavenge iron in mammalian hosts. As an immune response, the human protein Siderocalin binds both apo and ferric siderophores in order to intercept delivery of iron to the bacterium, impeding virulence. The introduction of steric clashes into the siderophore structure is an important mechanism of evading sequestration. However, in the absence of steric incompatibilities, electrostatic interactions determine siderophore strength of binding by Siderocalin. By using a series of isosteric enterobactin analogues, the contribution of electrostatic interactions, including both charge-charge and cation-pi, to the recognition of 2,3-catecholate siderophores has been deconvoluted. The analogues used in the study incorporate a systematic combination of 2,3-catecholamide (CAM) and N-hydroxypyridinonate (1,2-HOPO) binding units on a tris(2-aminoethyl)amine (tren) backbone, [tren(CAM)(m)(1,2-HOPO)(n), where m = 0, 1, 2, or 3 and n = 3 - m]. The shape complementarity of the synthetic analogue series was determined through small-molecule crystallography, and the binding interactions were investigated through a fluorescence-based binding assay. These results were modeled and correlated through ab initio calculations of the electrostatic properties of the binding units. Although all the analogues are accommodated in the binding pocket of Siderocalin, the ferric complexes incorporating decreasing numbers of CAM units are bound with decreasing affinities (K(d) = >600, 43, 0.8, and 0.3 nM for m = 0-3). These results elucidate the role of electrostatics in the mechanism of siderophore recognition by Siderocalin.
Iron is required for virulence of most bacterial pathogens, many of which rely on siderophores, small-molecule chelators, to scavenge n class="Chemical">iron in mammalian hosts. As an immune response, the human protein Siderocalin binds both apo and ferric siderophores in order to intercept delivery of iron to the bacterium, impeding virulence. The introduction of steric clashes into the siderophore structure is an important mechanism of evading sequestration. However, in the absence of steric incompatibilities, electrostatic interactions determine siderophore strength of binding by Siderocalin. By using a series of isosteric enterobactin analogues, the contribution of electrostatic interactions, including both charge-charge and cation-pi, to the recognition of 2,3-catecholate siderophores has been deconvoluted. The analogues used in the study incorporate a systematic combination of 2,3-catecholamide (CAM) and N-hydroxypyridinonate (1,2-HOPO) binding units on a tris(2-aminoethyl)amine (tren) backbone, [tren(CAM)(m)(1,2-HOPO)(n), where m = 0, 1, 2, or 3 and n = 3 - m]. The shape complementarity of the synthetic analogue series was determined through small-molecule crystallography, and the binding interactions were investigated through a fluorescence-based binding assay. These results were modeled and correlated through ab initio calculations of the electrostatic properties of the binding units. Although all the analogues are accommodated in the binding pocket of Siderocalin, the ferric complexes incorporating decreasing numbers of CAM units are bound with decreasing affinities (K(d) = >600, 43, 0.8, and 0.3 nM for m = 0-3). These results elucidate the role of electrostatics in the mechanism of siderophore recognition by Siderocalin.
Authors: Kai M Schmidt-Ott; Kiyoshi Mori; Jau Yi Li; Avtandil Kalandadze; David J Cohen; Prasad Devarajan; Jonathan Barasch Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2007-01-17 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Rebecca J Abergel; Melissa K Wilson; Jean E L Arceneaux; Trisha M Hoette; Roland K Strong; B Rowe Byers; Kenneth N Raymond Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-11-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Rebecca J Abergel; Matthew C Clifton; Juan C Pizarro; Jeffrey A Warner; David K Shuh; Roland K Strong; Kenneth N Raymond Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2008-08-05 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Nicolas Coudevylle; Leonhard Geist; Matthias Hötzinger; Markus Hartl; Georg Kontaxis; Klaus Bister; Robert Konrat Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2010-09-08 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Jason C Grigg; John D Cooper; Johnson Cheung; David E Heinrichs; Michael E P Murphy Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2010-02-10 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Colin Correnti; Matthew C Clifton; Rebecca J Abergel; Ben Allred; Trisha M Hoette; Mario Ruiz; Ranieri Cancedda; Kenneth N Raymond; Fiorella Descalzi; Roland K Strong Journal: Structure Date: 2011-12-07 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: Guanhu Bao; Matthew Clifton; Trisha M Hoette; Kiyoshi Mori; Shi-Xian Deng; Andong Qiu; Melanie Viltard; David Williams; Neal Paragas; Thomas Leete; Ritwij Kulkarni; Xiangpo Li; Belinda Lee; Avtandil Kalandadze; Adam J Ratner; Juan Carlos Pizarro; Kai M Schmidt-Ott; Donald W Landry; Kenneth N Raymond; Roland K Strong; Jonathan Barasch Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2010-06-27 Impact factor: 15.040