Literature DB >> 30310444

Accuracy of Positron Emission Tomography as a Diagnostic Tool for Lead Endocarditis: Design of the Prospective Multicentre ENDOTEP Study.

Sana Amraoui1, Ghoufrane Tlili2, Elif Hindié2, Paul Perez3, Olivia Peuchant1,2,3, Laurence Bordenave2, Pierre Bordachar1.   

Abstract

Background: Rates of pacemaker implantation are steadily increasing and as patients are living longer, endovenous leads remain implanted for an extended period of time thereby increasing the risk of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection. Investigating fever of unknown origin in patients with implanted pacemakers can be challenging. Recently, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computerised tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) scanning has been used as a diagnostic tool for lead endocarditis in small studies.
Objectives: ENDOTEP is a prospective and multicentre study designed to evaluate the accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET/CT scanning in the diagnosis of lead endocarditis.
Methods: A total of 250 patients referred for pacemaker extraction due to suspicion of an infected device will be prospectively enrolled in six French regional centres for investigation and treatment of CIED infection. 18F-FDG-PET/CT scanning (index test) will be performed in each patient in the 48 hours preceding lead extraction. Bacteriological cultures (reference standard) will assess the presence of lead endocarditis, blind to 18F-FDG-PET/CT results. Enrolment started in June 2015 and is expected to end by June 2017. The primary objective will be to establish the sensitivity of the 18F-FDG-PET/CT scan for lead endocarditis. Secondary objectives will include other accuracy parameters, inter-observer agreement in the interpretation of 18F-FDG-PET/CT scanning, the influence of previous antibiotic therapy on 18F-FDG-PET/CT diagnostic accuracy and assessment of septic emboli associated to lead endocarditis.
Conclusion: The ENDOTEP study will examine the ability of 18F-FDG-PET/CT scanning to avoid possible false-positive results, as is common using the current usual diagnostic strategy and may lead to unnecessary extraction of implants in patients with suspected lead infection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-FDG-PET/CT scanning; diagnostic accuracy; lead endocarditis; pacemaker infection; septic emboli

Year:  2016        PMID: 30310444      PMCID: PMC6159428          DOI: 10.15420/ecr.2016:6:2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Cardiol        ISSN: 1758-3756


  23 in total

Review 1.  Promising role of 18-F-fluoro-D-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in clinical infectious diseases.

Authors:  F De Winter; D Vogelaers; F Gemmel; R A Dierckx
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2002-04-20       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Local symptoms at the site of pacemaker implantation indicate latent systemic infection.

Authors:  D Klug; F Wallet; D Lacroix; C Marquié; C Kouakam; S Kacet; R Courcol
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Usefulness of fluorine-18 positron emission tomography/computed tomography for identification of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections.

Authors:  Jean-François Sarrazin; François Philippon; Michel Tessier; Jean Guimond; Franck Molin; Jean Champagne; Isabelle Nault; Louis Blier; Maxime Nadeau; Lyne Charbonneau; Mikaël Trottier; Gilles O'Hara
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Transvenous lead extraction: Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus on facilities, training, indications, and patient management: this document was endorsed by the American Heart Association (AHA).

Authors:  Bruce L Wilkoff; Charles J Love; Charles L Byrd; Maria Grazia Bongiorni; Roger G Carrillo; George H Crossley; Laurence M Epstein; Richard A Friedman; Charles E H Kennergren; Przemyslaw Mitkowski; Raymond H M Schaerf; Oussama M Wazni
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  FDG PET/CT in cardiac electronic devices infection: Now is the time to target guidelines implementation.

Authors:  François Rouzet; Fabien Hyafil; Dominique Le Guludec
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Cardiac device-related endocarditis complicated by spinal abscess.

Authors:  Yasser Rodriguez; Arnold J Greenspon; Muhammad R Sohail; Roger G Carrillo
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Management and outcome of permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator infections.

Authors:  Muhammad R Sohail; Daniel Z Uslan; Akbar H Khan; Paul A Friedman; David L Hayes; Walter R Wilson; James M Steckelberg; Sarah Stoner; Larry M Baddour
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  New criteria for diagnosis of infective endocarditis: utilization of specific echocardiographic findings. Duke Endocarditis Service.

Authors:  D T Durack; A S Lukes; D K Bright
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Risk factors for mortality in patients with cardiac device-related infection.

Authors:  Timir S Baman; Sanjaya K Gupta; Javier A Valle; Elina Yamada
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-02-13

Review 10.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.