| Literature DB >> 30305067 |
Elizabeth Kagotho1, Geoffrey Omuse2, Nancy Okinda2, Peter Ojwang3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vitamin D has been known since the twentieth Century for its benefits in bone health. Recent observational studies have demonstrated its benefits in infectious diseases such as tuberculosis and non-communicable diseases such as diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases and cancer. This has led to a dramatic increase in testing among adults. The cut-offs for vitamin D deficiency have been debated for decades and the current cut off is derived from a Caucasian population. Studies done among black African adults in Africa are few with vitamin D deficiency ranging from 5 to 91%. A few cut- offs have correlated vitamin D deficiency to physiological markers such as parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcium and phosphate with varying results.Entities:
Keywords: Africa; Cut-offs; Kenya; Vitamin D deficiency
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30305067 PMCID: PMC6180659 DOI: 10.1186/s12902-018-0296-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Endocr Disord ISSN: 1472-6823 Impact factor: 2.763
Descriptive characteristics of the study participants
| Male ( | Female ( | Total ( | Male vs female | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median(IQR) | Min-Max | Median (IQR) | Min-Max | Median (IQR) | Min-Max | ||
| Age (years) | 33 (40) | 19–59 | 31 (30) | 21–51 | 33.07 (40) | 19–59 | 0.304 |
| Vitamin D (ng/ml) | 28.24 (44.47) | 8.89–53.36 | 25.08 (34.12) | 8.57–42.71 | 27.80 (44.79) | 8.57–53.36 | 0.002 |
| PTH (pg/ml) | 36.46 (72.69) | 10.38–83.07 | 36.71 (83.38) | 16.72–100.1 | 36.7 (89.72) | 10.38–100.1 | 0.534 |
| Calcium (mmol/l) | 2.42 (1.50) | 1.23–2.73 | 2.38 (0.72) | 2.05–2.77 | 2.41 (1.54) | 1.23–2.77 | 0.168 |
| Phosphate (mmol/l) | 1.17 (3.32) | 0.66–3.98 | 1.17 (2.58) | 0.82–3.40 | 1.13 (3.32) | 0.66–3.98 | 0.360 |
IQR interquartile range
Fig. 1Distribution of vitamin D levels
Comparison of risk factors for Vitamin D deficiency
| Deficient | Non-deficient | Crude O.R (C.I) | Adjusted O.R. (C.I) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender: N (%) | ||||||
| Femalea | 17 (27.4%) | 45 (72.6%) | ||||
| Male | 27 (14.1%) | 164 (85.9%) | 0.03 | 0.463 (0.212–0.784) | 0.04 | 0.481 (0.233–0.933) |
| Sunshine exposure: N (%) | ||||||
| ≤ 1 h dailya | 66 (76.7%) | 20 (23.3%) | ||||
| 1–3 h daily | 57 (81.4%) | 13 (18.6%) | 0.48 | 0.753 (0.344–0.1647) | 0.13 | 0.893 (0.0.658–4.912) |
| > 3 h daily | 86 (88.7%) | 11 (11.3%) | 0.03 | 0.422 (0.189–0.942) | 0.08 | 0.623 (0.487–3.889) |
| Oily fish intake: N (%) | ||||||
| Nonea | 30 (19.9%) | 121 (80.1%) | ||||
| ≥ once a week | 14 (13.7%) | 88 (86.3%) | 0.20 | 0.642 (0.231–1.281) | ||
| Sunscreen use: N (%) | ||||||
| Nonea | 42 (17.6%) | 197 (82.4%) | ||||
| Yes | 2 (14.3%) | 12 (85.7%) | 0.75 | 0.782 (0.169–3.623) | ||
aReference group, O.R Odds ratio, C.I Confidence interval
Fig. 2Scatter plot showing the relationship of vitamin D and PTH