| Literature DB >> 30305020 |
Sarah R McCoski1, McCauley T Vailes1, Connor E Owens2, Rebecca R Cockrum2, Alan D Ealy3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Embryonic and fetal exposure to maternal obesity causes several maladaptive morphological and epigenetic changes in exposed offspring. The timing of these events is unclear, but changes can be observed even after a short exposure to maternal obesity around the time of conception. The hypothesis of this work is that maternal obesity influences the ovine preimplantation conceptus early in pregnancy, and this exposure will affect gene expression in embryonic and extraembryonic tissues.Entities:
Keywords: Conceptus; Maternal obesity; Placenta; Preimplantation
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30305020 PMCID: PMC6180665 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-5120-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Body parameters of obese and lean ewes
| Parameterc | Obese | Lean |
|---|---|---|
| Number of ewes | 13 | 14 |
| Weight at D14 (kg) | 100.6 ± 3.7A | 64.9 ± 2.4B |
| BCS | 4.4 ± 0.1A | 2.7 ± 0.1B |
| Back fat (cm) | 1.5 ± 0.1A | 0.4 ± 0.1B |
| Plasma glucose (mg/dL) | 3.47 ± 0.3 | 2.49 ± 0.7 |
| Plasma NEFA (mEq/L) | ||
| D0a | 0.219 ± 0.11 | 0.250 ± 0.06 |
| D6a | 0.059 ± 0.03 | 0.087 ± 0.02 |
| D14b | 0.037 ± 0.003 | 0.037 ± 0.003 |
a,bLower case superscripts indicated differences by day of sampling (P < 0.05)
cUppercase superscripts denote differences between groups (P < 0.05)
Ewe pregnancy parameters
| Parameter | Obese | Lean |
|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy rate (%) | 62.5 | 68.4 |
| CL number | 2.07 ± 0.15 | 1.84 ± 0.16 |
| Conceptuses/CL (%) | 96.2 ± 0.05 | 85.2 ± 0.07 |
| Male:female ratioa | 6:9 (40:60) | 7:6 (54:46) |
| Mean conceptus length (cm) | ||
| Male | 10.46 ± 1.9 | 8.18 ± 1.8 |
| Female | 8.07 ± 1.8 | 9.57 ± 1.9 |
| Range in conceptus length (cm) | 4–26 | 3–24 |
| Total uterine IFNT (mg) | 12.0 ± 4.2 | 8.1 ± 5.4 |
| Conceptus size-adjusted IFNT (mg/cm)b | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 0.6 ± 0.2 |
| Male:female ratiob | 6:9 (40:60) | 7:6 |
| P4 concentration (ng/ml) | ||
| D0 | 0.5 ± 0.3 | 0.4 ± 0.3 |
| D6 | 2.6 ± 0.3 | 2.9 ± 0.3 |
| D14 | 4.0 ± 0.3 | 4.7 ± 0.3 |
aData presented numerically and as a percentage of total conceptuses within treatment in parentheses.
bThe IFNT content was adjusted based on the combined size of all conceptuses collected from the flush (total IFNT / cm of all conceptuses in the flush).
Fig. 1The number of up- and down- regulated genes across experimental comparisons. Ovine conceptuses were collected from obese and lean ewes on day 14 of pregnancy via uterine flush. Conceptus sex was determined by PCR using X- and Y-specific primers, and 4 conceptuses/sex/treatment underwent RNA sequencing (N = 16 total conceptuses). Sequencing analysis was performed using Genomics Workbench 10.1.1 (CLC bio). Sequences were mapped to the Ovis aries genome (NCBI; Oar_4.0). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified as having a FDR ≤ 0.05, ≥ 2-fold change, and ≥ 0.2 RPKM. The number of DEGs that were up (gray) or down (black)-regulated is indicated based on obesity status, sex, and changes that were unique in individual comparisons between obese/lean versus male/female conceptuses
Obese versus lean DEGs identified in conceptus samples and associated gene ontology (GO) terms
| Gene ID | Fold change, obese vs lean (Log2)a | Cellular process | Metabolic process | Cellular component organization | Proliferation, | Obesity and insulin resistance | Placentab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 8.66 |
| |||||
|
| 8.46 | ||||||
|
| 8.41 | ||||||
|
| 7.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6.65 |
|
|
| |||
|
| 6.53 |
| |||||
|
| 6.31 |
|
|
| |||
|
| 5.94 | ||||||
|
| 5.26 |
|
| ||||
|
| 3.66 |
|
| ||||
|
| 1.62 |
|
| ||||
|
| −4.42 |
|
|
| |||
|
| −4.78 |
| |||||
|
| −5.55 |
|
| ||||
|
| −6.0 | ||||||
|
| −7.12 |
| |||||
|
| −7.66 |
| |||||
|
| −8.04 | ||||||
|
| −8.24 | ||||||
|
| −8.61 |
| |||||
|
| −8.89 |
|
|
arelative fold change (FDR ≤ 0.05, ≥ 2-fold change, ≥ 0.2 RPKM)
bThe term “Placenta” is not an official GO term. It represents genes identified through a literature search using the search terms “placenta”, “trophectoderm”, and “trophoblast”
“+” indicates the presence of the DEG within the specific GO term
Biological terms detected based on conceptus sex
| Biological GO term | Greatest | # DEGsa | % total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary metabolic processes |
| 23 | 16.7 |
| Regulation of biological processes |
| 18 | 13.2 |
| Cell death |
| 4 | 2.9 |
| Transport |
| 8 | 5.8 |
| Placentab |
| 33 | 24.1 |
aFDR ≤ 0.05, ≥ 2-fold-change, ≥ 0.2 RPKM
bThe term “Placenta” is not an official GO term. It represents genes identified through a literature search using the search terms “placenta”, “trophectoderm”, and “trophoblast”
Fig. 2Heat map showing clustering patterns for placenta-associated DEGs exhibiting sex and obesity-dependent effects. Ovine conceptuses were collected from obese and lean ewes on day 14 of pregnancy by uterine flush. Conceptus sex was determined by PCR using X- and Y-specific primers, and 4 conceptuses/sex/treatment underwent RNA sequencing (N = 16 total conceptuses). Sequencing analysis was performed using Genomics Workbench 10.1.1 (CLC bio). Sequences were mapped to the Ovis aries genome (NCBI; Oar_4.0), and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified as having a FDR ≤ 0.05, ≥ 2-fold change, and ≥ 0.2 RPKM. Genes involved in placentation were identified from the list of DEGs via literature search. Individual gene IDs can be found in Additional file 6