Silke Hügl1, Katharina Rülander2, Thomas Lenarz2, Omid Majdani2, Thomas S Rau2. 1. Department of Otolaryngology and Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all" EXC 1077/1, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany. huegl.silke@mh-hannover.de. 2. Department of Otolaryngology and Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all" EXC 1077/1, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Latest research on cochlear implantations focuses on hearing preservation during insertion of the implant's electrode array by reducing insertion trauma. One parameter which may influence trauma is insertion speed. The objective of this study was to extend the range of examined insertion speeds to include ultra-low velocities, being lower than manually feasible, and investigate whether these reduce insertion forces. METHODS: 24 custom-made cochlear implant test samples were fabricated and inserted into an artificial scala tympani model using 12 different insertion speeds while measuring the resulting insertion forces. Three commercially available slim straight electrode carriers were inserted using the same setup to analyze whether the results are comparable. RESULTS: Insertions of the test samples using high insertion speeds (2.0/2.8 mm/s) showed significantly higher insertion forces than insertions done with low insertion speeds (0.2 mm/s) or ultra-low insertion speeds (< 0.1 mm/s). The insertions with commercial slim straight electrode arrays showed significantly reduced insertion forces when using a low insertion speed as well. CONCLUSIONS: Slow insertions showed significantly reduced insertion forces. Insertion speeds which are lower than manually feasible showed even lower insertion forces.
PURPOSE: Latest research on cochlear implantations focuses on hearing preservation during insertion of the implant's electrode array by reducing insertion trauma. One parameter which may influence trauma is insertion speed. The objective of this study was to extend the range of examined insertion speeds to include ultra-low velocities, being lower than manually feasible, and investigate whether these reduce insertion forces. METHODS: 24 custom-made cochlear implant test samples were fabricated and inserted into an artificial scala tympani model using 12 different insertion speeds while measuring the resulting insertion forces. Three commercially available slim straight electrode carriers were inserted using the same setup to analyze whether the results are comparable. RESULTS: Insertions of the test samples using high insertion speeds (2.0/2.8 mm/s) showed significantly higher insertion forces than insertions done with low insertion speeds (0.2 mm/s) or ultra-low insertion speeds (< 0.1 mm/s). The insertions with commercial slim straight electrode arrays showed significantly reduced insertion forces when using a low insertion speed as well. CONCLUSIONS: Slow insertions showed significantly reduced insertion forces. Insertion speeds which are lower than manually feasible showed even lower insertion forces.
Authors: Christoph A von Ilberg; Uwe Baumann; Jan Kiefer; Jochen Tillein; Oliver F Adunka Journal: Audiol Neurootol Date: 2011-05-24 Impact factor: 1.854
Authors: Robert J S Briggs; Michael Tykocinski; Roland Lazsig; Antje Aschendorff; Thomas Lenarz; Timo Stöver; Bernard Fraysse; Mathieu Marx; J Thomas Roland; Peter S Roland; Charles G Wright; Bruce J Gantz; James F Patrick; Frank Risi Journal: Cochlear Implants Int Date: 2011-08
Authors: Cameron M Hendricks; Matt S Cavilla; David E Usevitch; Trevor L Bruns; Katherine E Riojas; Lisandro Leon; Robert J Webster; Frank M Warren; Jake J Abbott Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2021-08-01 Impact factor: 2.619