Literature DB >> 27825860

Damage to inner ear structure during cochlear implantation: Correlation between insertion force and radio-histological findings in temporal bone specimens.

Daniele De Seta1, Renato Torres2, Francesca Yoshie Russo3, Evelyne Ferrary2, Guillaume Kazmitcheff2, Dominique Heymann4, Jerome Amiaud5, Olivier Sterkers6, Daniele Bernardeschi6, Yann Nguyen6.   

Abstract

Cochlear implant insertion should be as least traumatic as possible in order to reduce trauma to the cochlear sensory structures. The force applied to the cochlea during array insertion should be controlled to limit insertion-related damage. The relationship between insertion force and histological traumatism remains to be demonstrated. Twelve freshly frozen cadaveric temporal bones were implanted with a long straight electrodes array through an anterior extended round window insertion using a motorized insertion tool with real-time measurement of the insertion force. Anatomical parameters, measured on a pre-implantation cone beam CT scan, position of the array and force metrics were correlated with post-implantation scanning electron microscopy images and histological damage assessment. An atraumatic insertion occurred in six cochleae, a translocation in five cochleae and a basilar membrane rupture in one cochlea. The translocation always occurred in the 150- to 180-degree region. In the case of traumatic insertion, different force profiles were observed with a more irregular curve arising from the presence of an early peak force (30 ± 18.2 mN). This corresponded approximately to the first point of contact of the array with the lateral wall of the cochlea. Atraumatic and traumatic insertions had significantly different force values at the same depth of insertion (p < 0.001, two-way ANOVA), and significantly different regression lines (y = 1.34x + 0.7 for atraumatic and y = 3.37x + 0.84 for traumatic insertion, p < 0.001, ANCOVA). In the present study, the insertion force was correlated with the intracochlear trauma. The 150- to 180-degree region represented the area at risk for scalar translocation for this straight electrodes array. Insertion force curves with different sets of values were identified for traumatic and atraumatic insertions; these values should be considered during motorized insertion of an implant so as to be able to modify the insertion parameters (e.g axis of insertion) and facilitate preservation of endocochlear structures.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Basilar membrane; Cochlear implant; Inner ear trauma; Insertion force; Scala tympani; Translocation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27825860     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  9 in total

1.  Investigation of ultra-low insertion speeds in an inelastic artificial cochlear model using custom-made cochlear implant electrodes.

Authors:  Silke Hügl; Katharina Rülander; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani; Thomas S Rau
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Insertion forces and intracochlear trauma in temporal bone specimens implanted with a straight atraumatic electrode array.

Authors:  Marjan Mirsalehi; Thomas S Rau; Lenka Harbach; Silke Hügl; Saleh Mohebbi; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  A PLLA Coating Does Not Affect the Insertion Pressure or Frictional Behavior of a CI Electrode Array at Higher Insertion Speeds.

Authors:  Dana Dohr; Katharina Wulf; Niels Grabow; Robert Mlynski; Sebastian P Schraven
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  Is Cochlear Length Related to Congenital Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Preliminary Data.

Authors:  Mehmet Bilgin Eser; Başak Atalay; Mahmut Tayyar Kalcıoğlu
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.017

5.  Clinical Translation of an Insertion Tool for Minimally Invasive Cochlear Implant Surgery.

Authors:  Katherine E Riojas; Emily T Tran; Michael H Freeman; Jack H Noble; Robert J Webster; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  J Med Device       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 0.743

6.  Application of next‑generation sequencing to identify mitochondrial mutations: Study on m.7511T>C in patients with hearing loss.

Authors:  Urszula Lechowicz; Agnieszka Pollak; Agnieszka Frączak; Małgorzata Rydzanicz; Piotr Stawiński; Artur Lorens; Piotr H Skarżyński; Henryk Skarżyński; Rafał Płoski; Monika Ołdak
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.952

7.  Increased Threshold and Reduced Firing Rate of Auditory Cortex Neurons after Cochlear Implant Insertion.

Authors:  Elie Partouche; Victor Adenis; Dan Gnansia; Pierre Stahl; Jean-Marc Edeline
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-01-31

8.  The effect of the surgical approach and cochlear implant electrode on the structural integrity of the cochlea in human temporal bones.

Authors:  Saad Jwair; Huib Versnel; Robert J Stokroos; Hans G X M Thomeer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  Practicable assessment of cochlear size and shape from clinical CT images.

Authors:  Andrew H Gee; Yufeng Zhao; Graham M Treece; Manohar L Bance
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.