BACKGROUND: Apraxia of Speech (AOS) has been associated with deviations in consonantal voice-onset-time (VOT), but studies of vowel acoustics have yielded conflicting results. However, a speech motor planning disorder that is not bound by phonological categories is expected to affect vowel as well as consonant articulations. AIMS: We measured consonant VOTs and vowel formants produced by a large sample of stroke survivors, and assessed to what extent these variables and their dispersion are predictive of AOS presence and severity, based on a scale that uses clinical observations to rate gradient presence of AOS, aphasia, and dysarthria. METHODS & PROCEDURES: Picture-description samples were collected from 53 stroke survivors, including unimpaired speakers (12) and speakers with primarily aphasia (19), aphasia with AOS (12), primarily AOS (2), aphasia with dysarthria (2), and aphasia with AOS and dysarthria (6). The first three formants were extracted from vowel tokens bearing main stress in open-class words, as well as VOTs for voiced and voiceless stops. Vowel space was estimated as reflected in the formant centralization ratio. Stepwise Linear Discriminant Analyses were used to predict group membership, and ordinal regression to predict AOS severity, based on the absolute values of these variables, as well as the standard deviations of formants and VOTs within speakers. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Presence and severity of AOS were most consistently predicted by the dispersion of F1, F2, and voiced-stop VOT. These phonetic-acoustic measures do not correlate with aphasia severity. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm that the AOS affects articulation across-the-board and does not selectively spare vowel production.
BACKGROUND: Apraxia of Speech (AOS) has been associated with deviations in consonantal voice-onset-time (VOT), but studies of vowel acoustics have yielded conflicting results. However, a speech motor planning disorder that is not bound by phonological categories is expected to affect vowel as well as consonant articulations. AIMS: We measured consonant VOTs and vowel formants produced by a large sample of stroke survivors, and assessed to what extent these variables and their dispersion are predictive of AOS presence and severity, based on a scale that uses clinical observations to rate gradient presence of AOS, aphasia, and dysarthria. METHODS & PROCEDURES: Picture-description samples were collected from 53 stroke survivors, including unimpaired speakers (12) and speakers with primarily aphasia (19), aphasia with AOS (12), primarily AOS (2), aphasia with dysarthria (2), and aphasia with AOS and dysarthria (6). The first three formants were extracted from vowel tokens bearing main stress in open-class words, as well as VOTs for voiced and voiceless stops. Vowel space was estimated as reflected in the formant centralization ratio. Stepwise Linear Discriminant Analyses were used to predict group membership, and ordinal regression to predict AOS severity, based on the absolute values of these variables, as well as the standard deviations of formants and VOTs within speakers. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Presence and severity of AOS were most consistently predicted by the dispersion of F1, F2, and voiced-stop VOT. These phonetic-acoustic measures do not correlate with aphasia severity. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm that the AOS affects articulation across-the-board and does not selectively spare vowel production.
Authors: Rene L Utianski; Peter R Martin; Holly Hanley; Joseph R Duffy; Hugo Botha; Heather M Clark; Jennifer L Whitwell; Keith A Josephs Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 2.297