Literature DB >> 20008683

Vowel acoustics in adults with apraxia of speech.

Adam Jacks1, Katey A Mathes, Thomas P Marquardt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the hypothesis that vowel production is more variable in adults with acquired apraxia of speech (AOS) relative to healthy individuals with unimpaired speech. Vowel formant frequency measures were selected as the specific target of focus.
METHOD: Seven adults with AOS and aphasia produced 15 repetitions of 6 American English vowels in /hVC/ context (hid, head, hat, hot, hub, hoot). Vowel formant frequency measures (F1, F2) were Bark transformed and compared with data from archival sources.
RESULTS: Measures of vowel acoustics in speakers with AOS did not differ from those of unimpaired speakers, including absolute Bark formant values, vowel space area, intervowel distance, and individual trial-to-trial formant variability.
CONCLUSION: Comparison with normative acoustic measures suggested that vowel production at the word level is unimpaired in the current speakers with AOS, supporting previous studies that have shown vowel production is relatively intact in AOS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20008683     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0017)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  6 in total

1.  A Multivariate Analytic Approach to the Differential Diagnosis of Apraxia of Speech.

Authors:  Alexandra Basilakos; Grigori Yourganov; Dirk-Bart den Ouden; Daniel Fogerty; Chris Rorden; Lynda Feenaughty; Julius Fridriksson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Feedforward and feedback control in apraxia of speech: effects of noise masking on vowel production.

Authors:  Edwin Maas; Marja-Liisa Mailend; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Assessing speech correction abilities with acoustic analyses: Evidence of preserved online correction in persons with aphasia.

Authors:  Caroline A Niziolek; Swathi Kiran
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 2.484

4.  Vowel Formant Dispersion Reflects Severity of Apraxia of Speech.

Authors:  Dirk-Bart den Ouden; Elena Galkina; Alexandra Basilakos; Julius Fridriksson
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 2.773

Review 5.  Differential Diagnosis of Apraxia of Speech in Children and Adults: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Kristen M Allison; Claire Cordella; Jenya Iuzzini-Seigel; Jordan R Green
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  A Longitudinal Evaluation of Speech Rate in Primary Progressive Apraxia of Speech.

Authors:  Rene L Utianski; Peter R Martin; Holly Hanley; Joseph R Duffy; Hugo Botha; Heather M Clark; Jennifer L Whitwell; Keith A Josephs
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 2.297

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.