Literature DB >> 15603155

A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research.

Patti Adank1, Roel Smits, Roeland van Hout.   

Abstract

An evaluation of vowel normalization procedures for the purpose of studying language variation is presented. The procedures were compared on how effectively they (a) preserve phonemic information, (b) preserve information about the talker's regional background (or sociolinguistic information), and (c) minimize anatomical/physiological variation in acoustic representations of vowels. Recordings were made for 80 female talkers and 80 male talkers of Dutch. These talkers were stratified according to their gender and regional background. The normalization procedures were applied to measurements of the fundamental frequency and the first three formant frequencies for a large set of vowel tokens. The normalization procedures were evaluated through statistical pattern analysis. The results show that normalization procedures that use information across multiple vowels ("vowel-extrinsic" information) to normalize a single vowel token performed better than those that include only information contained in the vowel token itself ("vowel-intrinsic" information). Furthermore, the results show that normalization procedures that operate on individual formants performed better than those that use information across multiple formants (e.g., "formant-extrinsic" F2-F1).

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15603155     DOI: 10.1121/1.1795335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  25 in total

1.  Cross-linguistic studies of children's and adults' vowel spaces.

Authors:  Hyunju Chung; Eun Jong Kong; Jan Edwards; Gary Weismer; Marios Fourakis; Youngdeok Hwang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Acoustic properties of vowel production in prelingually deafened Mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jing Yang; Emily Brown; Robert A Fox; Li Xu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Acoustic characteristics of the vowel systems of six regional varieties of American English.

Authors:  Cynthia G Clopper; David B Pisoni; Kenneth de Jong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Vowel acoustic space development in children: a synthesis of acoustic and anatomic data.

Authors:  Houri K Vorperian; Ray D Kent
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Speaker-independent factors affecting the perception of foreign accent in a second language.

Authors:  Susannah V Levi; Stephen J Winters; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Masculine men articulate less clearly.

Authors:  Vera Kempe; David A Puts; Rodrigo A Cárdenas
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2013-12

Review 7.  What Acoustic Studies Tell Us About Vowels in Developing and Disordered Speech.

Authors:  Ray D Kent; Carrie Rountrey
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.408

8.  Vocal alignment to native and non-native speakers of English.

Authors:  Eva M Lewandowski; Lynne C Nygaard
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Routes to lenition: an acoustic study.

Authors:  Eftychia Eftychiou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Formant centralization ratio: a proposal for a new acoustic measure of dysarthric speech.

Authors:  Shimon Sapir; Lorraine O Ramig; Jennifer L Spielman; Cynthia Fox
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.