Literature DB >> 30297430

Humans incorporate attention-dependent uncertainty into perceptual decisions and confidence.

Rachel N Denison1,2, William T Adler2, Marisa Carrasco3,2, Wei Ji Ma3,2.   

Abstract

Perceptual decisions are better when they take uncertainty into account. Uncertainty arises not only from the properties of sensory input but also from cognitive sources, such as different levels of attention. However, it is unknown whether humans appropriately adjust for such cognitive sources of uncertainty during perceptual decision-making. Here we show that, in a task in which uncertainty is relevant for performance, human categorization and confidence decisions take into account uncertainty related to attention. We manipulated uncertainty in an orientation categorization task from trial to trial using only an attentional cue. The categorization task was designed to disambiguate decision rules that did or did not depend on attention. Using formal model comparison to evaluate decision behavior, we found that category and confidence decision boundaries shifted as a function of attention in an approximately Bayesian fashion. This means that the observer's attentional state on each trial contributed probabilistically to the decision computation. This responsiveness of an observer's decisions to attention-dependent uncertainty should improve perceptual decisions in natural vision, in which attention is unevenly distributed across a scene.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian; attention; confidence; criterion; perceptual decision

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30297430      PMCID: PMC6205425          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1717720115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  42 in total

1.  Noise exclusion in spatial attention.

Authors:  B A Dosher; Z L Lu
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-03

2.  Covert attention affects the psychometric function of contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  E Leslie Cameron; Joanna C Tai; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The unique criterion constraint: a false alarm?

Authors:  Leonid L Kontsevich; Chien-Chung Chen; Preeti Verghese; Christopher W Tyler
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 4.  Attentional modulation of visual processing.

Authors:  John H Reynolds; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

5.  Direct injection of noise to the visual cortex decreases accuracy but increases decision confidence.

Authors:  Dobromir A Rahnev; Brian Maniscalco; Bruce Luber; Hakwan Lau; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Spatial attention increases performance but not subjective confidence in a discrimination task.

Authors:  Claudia Wilimzig; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Manfred Fahle; Wolfgang Einhäuser; Christof Koch
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  Neural coding of uncertainty and probability.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Mehrdad Jazayeri
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Cortical representations of confidence in a visual perceptual decision.

Authors:  Leopold Zizlsperger; Thomas Sauvigny; Barbara Händel; Thomas Haarmeier
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Bandwidths of orientation channels in human vision.

Authors:  J P Thomas; J Gille
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1979-05

10.  Visual clutter causes high-magnitude errors.

Authors:  Stefano Baldassi; Nicola Megna; David C Burr
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  18 in total

1.  Distinct neural contributions to metacognition for detecting, but not discriminating visual stimuli.

Authors:  Matan Mazor; Karl J Friston; Stephen M Fleming
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 2.  Decision neuroscience and neuroeconomics: Recent progress and ongoing challenges.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Dennison; Daniel Sazhin; David V Smith
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-02-08

3.  Confidence at the limits of human nested cognition.

Authors:  Samuel Recht; Ljubica Jovanovic; Pascal Mamassian; Tarryn Balsdon
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2022-10-15

4.  Suboptimality in Perceptual Decision Making.

Authors:  Dobromir Rahnev; Rachel N Denison
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 5.  Sources of Metacognitive Inefficiency.

Authors:  Medha Shekhar; Dobromir Rahnev
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 6.  Representations of uncertainty: where art thou?

Authors:  Ádám Koblinger; József Fiser; Máté Lengyel
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2021-04

7.  Variance misperception under skewed empirical noise statistics explains overconfidence in the visual periphery.

Authors:  Charles J Winter; Megan A K Peters
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  An observer model of tilt perception, sensitivity and confidence.

Authors:  Derek H Arnold; Blake W Saurels; Natasha L Anderson; Alan Johnston
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 5.530

9.  Comparing Bayesian and non-Bayesian accounts of human confidence reports.

Authors:  William T Adler; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  The nature of metacognitive inefficiency in perceptual decision making.

Authors:  Medha Shekhar; Dobromir Rahnev
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 8.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.