Literature DB >> 18842078

Spatial attention increases performance but not subjective confidence in a discrimination task.

Claudia Wilimzig1, Naotsugu Tsuchiya, Manfred Fahle, Wolfgang Einhäuser, Christof Koch.   

Abstract

Selective attention to a target yields faster and more accurate responses. Faster response times, in turn, are usually associated with increased subjective confidence. Could the decrease in reaction time in the presence of attention therefore simply reflect a shift toward more confident responses? We here addressed the extent to which attention modulates accuracy, processing speed, and confidence independently. To probe the effect of spatial attention on performance, we used two attentional manipulations of a visual orientation discrimination task. We demonstrate that spatial attention significantly increases accuracy, whereas subjective confidence measures reveal overconfidence in non-attended stimuli. At constant confidence levels, reaction times showed a significant decrease (by 15-49%, corresponding to 100-250 ms). This dissociation of objective performance and subjective confidence suggests that attention and awareness, as measured by confidence, are distinct, albeit related, phenomena.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18842078     DOI: 10.1167/8.5.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  33 in total

1.  Distinct patterns of functional brain connectivity correlate with objective performance and subjective beliefs.

Authors:  Pablo Barttfeld; Bruno Wicker; Phil McAleer; Pascal Belin; Yann Cojan; Martín Graziano; Ramón Leiguarda; Mariano Sigman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Visuospatial selective attention in chickens.

Authors:  Devarajan Sridharan; Deepa L Ramamurthy; Jason S Schwarz; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Hysteresis affects approximate number discrimination in young children.

Authors:  Darko Odic; Howard Hock; Justin Halberda
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-11-19

4.  FN400 potentials are functionally identical to N400 potentials and reflect semantic processing during recognition testing.

Authors:  Joel L Voss; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Suboptimality in Perceptual Decision Making.

Authors:  Dobromir Rahnev; Rachel N Denison
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 12.579

6.  Humans incorporate attention-dependent uncertainty into perceptual decisions and confidence.

Authors:  Rachel N Denison; William T Adler; Marisa Carrasco; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Sources of Metacognitive Inefficiency.

Authors:  Medha Shekhar; Dobromir Rahnev
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 8.  The neural basis of metacognitive ability.

Authors:  Stephen M Fleming; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Effects of loss aversion on post-decision wagering: implications for measures of awareness.

Authors:  Stephen M Fleming; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2009-12-11

10.  The nature of metacognitive inefficiency in perceptual decision making.

Authors:  Medha Shekhar; Dobromir Rahnev
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 8.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.