| Literature DB >> 30297366 |
Andrew M Hogan1, Viola C Scoffone2, Vadim Makarov3, April S Gislason1, Haben Tesfu1, Maria S Stietz1, Ann Karen C Brassinga1, Michael Domaratzki4, Xuan Li5, Alberto Azzalin2,6, Marco Biggiogera2, Olga Riabova3, Natalia Monakhova3, Laurent R Chiarelli2, Giovanna Riccardi2, Silvia Buroni7, Silvia T Cardona8,9.
Abstract
To streamline the elucidation of antibacterial compounds' mechanism of action, comprehensive high-throughput assays interrogating multiple putative targets are necessary. However, current chemogenomic approaches for antibiotic target identification have not fully utilized the multiplexing potential of next-generation sequencing. Here, we used Illumina sequencing of transposon insertions to track the competitive fitness of a Burkholderia cenocepacia library containing essential gene knockdowns. Using this method, we characterized a novel benzothiadiazole derivative, 10126109 (C109), with antibacterial activity against B. cenocepacia, for which whole-genome sequencing of low-frequency spontaneous drug-resistant mutants had failed to identify the drug target. By combining the identification of hypersusceptible mutants and morphology screening, we show that C109 targets cell division. Furthermore, fluorescence microscopy of bacteria harboring green fluorescent protein (GFP) cell division protein fusions revealed that C109 prevents divisome formation by altering the localization of the essential cell division protein FtsZ. In agreement with this, C109 inhibited both the GTPase and polymerization activities of purified B. cenocepacia FtsZ. C109 displayed antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative cystic fibrosis pathogens, including Mycobacterium abscessus C109 effectively cleared B. cenocepacia infection in the Caenorhabditis elegans model and exhibited additive interactions with clinically relevant antibiotics. Hence, C109 is an enticing candidate for further drug development.Entities:
Keywords: Burkholderiazzm321990; FtsZ; Tn-seq; drug targets; essential genes; fluorescent image analysis; mechanisms of action
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30297366 PMCID: PMC6256756 DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01231-18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother ISSN: 0066-4804 Impact factor: 5.191
FIG 1Workflow of competitive fitness assay. (A) The sensitized mutant library is grown competitively without antibiotics (ATB; control), or with the IC25 of C109 or novobiocin. Growth with antibiotics selectively depletes certain mutants. (B) To track mutant abundance, transposon-genome junctions are enriched using Tn-Seq Circle. (C) Samples are sequenced on a HiSeq platform, and reads are then mapped to the B. cenocepacia K56-2 genome to call insertion sites. The reads from the antimicrobial-treated conditions are compared to the no-antibiotic controls to determine highly depleted mutants, which are used to call candidate antibacterial-target matches.
FIG 2A Tn-seq-based fitness assay and morphological phenotype screening links C109 to the dcw operon. (A and B) Hypersusceptibility of knockdown mutants to novobiocin (Novo) (A) and C109 (B). Only mutants with depletion ratios of a P value of <0.05 are shown. The region highlighted as “candidate targets” corresponds to knockdown mutants with log2 (depletion) greater than two standard deviations from the mean. (C) Comparison of hypersusceptible mutants to C109 and novobiocin. Light gray and charcoal dashes represent 2-standard deviation (2-SD) thresholds for novobiocin and C109, respectively. (D) Morphology of B. cenocepacia and knockdown mutants treated with 2× the MIC (16 μg/ml) C109 or incubated without rhamnose, respectively, for 6 h. Chevrons indicate septa in CGispA-dxs. All micrographs are to the same scale.
Antibacterial activity of C109 against select Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria
| Strain | Features | MIC (µg/ml) | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reference strain | 16 | ATCC | |
| ET12 lineage cystic fibrosis clinical isolate | 8 | ||
| ET12 lineage cystic fibrosis clinical isolate | 8 | ||
| Urine meropenem-resistant isolate | 32 | A. Kumar | |
| Reference strain | 8 | A. Kumar | |
| Reference strain | 8 | ATCC | |
| ESBL-positive clinical isolate | 4 | G. Zhanel | |
| ESBL-positive clinical isolate | 8 | G. Zhanel | |
| ESBL-positive clinical isolate | 32 | G. Zhanel | |
| Ciprofloxacin-resistant clinical isolate | 4 | H. Adam | |
| Ciprofloxacin-resistant clinical isolate | 4 | H. Adam | |
| Ciprofloxacin-resistant clinical isolate | 4 | H. Adam | |
| Ciprofloxacin-resistant clinical isolate | 8 | H. Adam | |
| Common lab strain, from burn wound | 256 | A. Kumar | |
| Nonrespiratory clinical isolate | 128 |
A. Kumar ( | |
| High virulence burn wound isolate | >128 | Joseph Lam ( | |
| SGI1 genomic island; multidrug resistant | 64 | ||
| Streptomycin-resistant strain | 16 | ||
| Methicillin-sensitive reference strain | 4 | ATCC |
MIC values are given as the median of three biological replicates.
FIG 3C109 causes cell filamentation and disrupts divisome formation. (A and B) Localization of FtsZ (A and B), FtsA (A), and FtsW (A) upon 3-h treatment of exponentially growing ASKA strains with C109 (A and B) or cefotaxime (B). Arrowheads show areas with deficient nucleoid segregation. Chevrons show proper nucleoid segregation. (C) Time-lapse fluorescence microscopy of FtsZ-GFP cells, spotted onto an agarose pad with or without 4 μg/ml C109. Dashes denote cell boundaries. (D and E) Cell length (D) and proportion of cells with Z-ring (E) after 3 h of exposure to C109 (n = 200 cells).
FIG 4Mild overexpression of MraZ-GFP, FtsA-GFP, and FtsZ-GFP but not FtsW-GFP, MurG-GFP, or SecA-GFP sensitizes cells to C109. Cells were induced with 10 µM IPTG and then exposed to C109 for 12 h. A spot plate was used to count the CFU per milliliter. Counts are relative to each strain without C109 treatment. (A) Growth of strains expressing MraZ-GFP, FtsA-GFP, and FtsZ-GFP. (B) Growth of strains expressing MurG-GFP, SecA-GFP, and FtsW-GFP. Vector refers to the strains harboring pCA24N-empty. Error bars show mean ± SD, with n = 3 biological replicates.
FIG 5Knockdown of ftsZ sensitizes cells to C109. (A) Organization of the B. cenocepacia dcw cluster and positions of the rhamnose (Rha)-inducible promoters in CGdcw and CGftsZ. (B) Hypersusceptibility of sensitized B. cenocepacia knockdown mutants grown clonally in response to increasing concentrations of C109. Error bars show mean ± SD, with n = 3 biological replicates. (C) Morphology of CGftsZ with high (0.20%) or low (0.04%) rhamnose, with or without C109.
FIG 6GTPase activity and polymerization assays demonstrate that C109 is a noncompetitive inhibitor of FtsZ. (A) IC50 determination of C109 against BcFtsZ. (B) Kinetic analyses of BcFtsZ in the presence of different C109 concentrations ranging from 0 to 50 μM. (C) SDS-PAGE of the sedimentation assay in the presence of different C109 concentrations. (D) Structure of FtsZ polymers in the presence of C109 (indicated by the arrow) visualized by TEM. Scale bar = 0.6 μm. Data are the mean ± SD of the results from three different replicates; images are representative of at least three different experiments.
Antibacterial activity of C109 against Bcc clinical isolates
| Strain | MIC (µg/ml) | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | E. Mahenthiralingam | |
| 4 | E. Mahenthiralingam | |
| 32 | ||
| 8 | ||
| 32 | ||
| 32 | ||
| 8 | D. Speert | |
| 16 | D. Speert | |
| 32 | E. Mahenthiralingam | |
| 8 | E. Mahenthiralingam | |
| 32 | E. Mahenthiralingam | |
| 16 | E. Mahenthiralingam | |
| 16 | P. Drevinek | |
| 16 | P. Drevinek | |
| 32 | E. Mahenthiralingam | |
| 4 | E. Mahenthiralingam | |
| 2 | E. Mahenthiralingam | |
| 4 | E. Mahenthiralingam | |
| 8 | E. Mahenthiralingam | |
| 64 | E. Mahenthiralingam | |
| 32 | ||
| 32 | ||
| 64 | ||
| 64 | ||
| 64 | ||
| 32 | ||
| 8 | ||
| 64 | P. Drevinek | |
| 64 | P. Drevinek | |
| 16 | E. Mahenthiralingam | |
| 8 | E. Mahenthiralingam | |
| 16 | P. Drevinek | |
| 16 | P. Drevinek | |
| 32 | P. Drevinek | |
| 16 | E. Mahenthiralingam |
Median values of three biological replicates are shown.
C109 has additive effects with common antibiotics used against B. cenocepacia
| Antibiotic | K56-2 MIC | K56-2 FIC | Interpretation | J2315 MIC | J2315 FIC | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meropenem | 32 | 0.625 | Additive | 32 | 0.508 | Additive |
| Piperacillin | 8 | 0.625 | Additive | 256 | 0.560 | Additive |
| Tobramycin | 512 | 0.625 | Additive | 512 | 2 | Additive |
| Ciprofloxacin | 2 | 1 | Additive | 8 | 2 | Additive |
| Ceftazidime | 64 | 0.625 | Additive | ND | ND | |
| Doxycycline | 4 | 0.625 | Additive | ND | ND | |
| Novobiocin | 8 | 0.75 | Additive | ND | ND | |
| Trimethoprim | 8 | 0.75 | Additive | 512 | 2 | Additive |
| Chloramphenicol | 32 | 1 | Additive | ND | ND |
Reported is the median FIC index from three biological replicates. ND, not determined.