| Literature DB >> 32318042 |
Laurent R Chiarelli1, Viola Camilla Scoffone1, Gabriele Trespidi1, Giulia Barbieri1, Olga Riabova2, Natalia Monakhova2, Alessio Porta3, Giulia Manina4, Giovanna Riccardi1, Vadim Makarov2, Silvia Buroni1.
Abstract
There is an urgent need for new antimicrobials to treat the opportunistic Gram-negative Burkholderia cenocepacia, which represents a problematic challenge for cystic fibrosis patients. Recently, a benzothiadiazole derivative, C109, was shown to be effective against the infections caused by B. cenocepacia and other Gram-negative and-positive bacteria. C109 has a promising cellular target, the cell division protein FtsZ, and a recently developed PEGylated formulation make it an attractive molecule to counteract Burkholderia infections. However, the ability of efflux pumps to extrude it out of the cell represents a limitation for its use. Here, more than 50 derivatives of C109 were synthesized and tested against Gram-negative species and the Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus. In addition, their activity was evaluated on the purified FtsZ protein. The chemical, metabolic and cellular stability of C109 has been assayed using different biological systems, including quantitative single-cell imaging. However, no further improvement on C109 was achieved, and the role of efflux in resistance was further confirmed. Also, a novel nitroreductase that can inactivate the compound was characterized, but it does not appear to play a role in natural resistance. All these data allowed a deep characterization of the compound, which will contribute to a further improvement of its properties.Entities:
Keywords: Burkholderia cenocepacia; cell division; cystic fibrosis; drug resistance; new antimicrobials
Year: 2020 PMID: 32318042 PMCID: PMC7154053 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00562
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Chemical structure, MICs and IC50 of C109 and of selected derivatives.
| C109 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 128 | Yes | 8 | |
| 10026149 | 32 | 16 | 2 | 16 | Yes | 20 | |
| 10126130 | >128 | 512 | 32 | >128 | Yes | 10 | |
| 10226047 | >512 | >512 | >512 | >128 | No | - | |
| 10626056 | >64 | >512 | 8 | >128 | Yes | 52 | |
| 10726015 | >64 | >512 | 512 | >128 | No | - | |
| 11026176 | >512 | >512 | 4 | >128 | Yes | 17 | |
| 11026177 | >512 | >512 | 4 | 64 | Yes | 19 | |
| 11126009 | >128 | >512 | 8 | >128 | Yes | 4 | |
| 11126010 | >128 | >512 | 4 | >128 | Yes | 15 | |
| 11126015 | >128 | >512 | 32 | >128 | Yes | 36 | |
| 11426142 | 32 | 8 | 4 | 32 | Yes | 21 | |
| 11426177 | >128 | >512 | 256 | ND | No | – | |
| 11626109 | 512 | >512 | >512 | ND | No | – | |
| 11726041 | >256 | >512 | >256 | ND | No | – | |
| 11726042 | >256 | >512 | >256 | ND | No | – | |
| 11726256 | 128 | 128 | 8 | >256 | No | – | |
| 11726257 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 128 | Yes | 3 | |
| 11726258 | 256 | >256 | 256 | >256 | Yes | 15 | |
| 11826109 | 256 | 128 | 16 | >256 | Yes | 30 | |
| 11826110 | 16 | 32 | 32 | >256 | No | – | |
| 11826363 | 16 | 16 | 64 | 256 | Yes | 30 | |
| 11926141 | >256 | >256 | 32 | >256 | Yes | 100 | |
| 11926142 | >256 | >256 | 32 | >256 | Yes | 100 | |
ND, Values Not Detected because of the resistance detected in the other bacteria. * Burkholderia cenocepacia purified FtsZ protein.
Figure 1Enzymatic characterization of FCF19-FtsZ and PAO1-FtsZ. (A) Steady state kinetic analysis of FCF19-FtsZ mutant as a function of GTP. (B) IC50 determination of C109 toward FCF19-FtsZ mutant. (C) Steady state kinetic analysis of PAO1-FtsZ mutant as a function of GTP. (D) IC50 determination of C109 toward PAO1-FtsZ.
MICs and RND-9 qRT-PCR results of B. cenocepacia FCF19 and FCF22 strains.
| FCF19 | 128 | 8 | 64 | 32 | 12 ± 1.2 |
| FCF22 | 256 | 16 | 256 | 32 | 20 ± 3.5 |
Figure 2Identification of the putative C109 metabolites produced by B. cenocepacia cells. The unstained (A) and UV light visualized (B) TLC analysis of the chromatographic fractions of cell cultures extract highlighted the presence of different compounds. Four compounds were identified by UPLC-MS analysis (Supplementary Figures 1–5) as potential C109 metabolites (C).
Figure 3Steady state kinetic analysis of BcNR, using 4-nitrobenzoic acid (A) and C109 (B) as substrate.
Figure 4Identification of BcNR C109 metabolites. Unstained (A) and UV light visualized (B) TLC analyses of the BcNR reaction using C109 as substrate (Rz), compared with the control performed with the same reaction mixture but without NADPH, demonstrated that the enzyme is able to transform C109 compound. The MS analysis [(C) full mass, and (D) fragmentation pattern] of the purified reaction products demonstrated that BcNR catalyzes the reduction of the nitro group of C109.
Figure 5Single-cell imaging of B. cenocepacia cells treated with C109. Contrast-phase image stacks of B. cenocepacia J2315 during the time-lapse microscopy in the microfluidic chamber. The white arrow indicates a cell that after the C109 treatment died, while a filamentous cell is indicated by the red arrow. Time is indicated in h at the bottom-right corner of each picture. C109 treatment (12.5X-MIC) is indicated on the top-right corner. Scale bar in the first picture is 5 μm.
Figure 6Single-cell analysis of growth rate for different cell categories. Single-cell growth rate of survivor cells (A) and cell dead by lysis (B) prior to and following C109 exposure (n = 30). Early recovery was defined between 6 and 10 h and late recovery was defined between 10 and 18 h, from the beginning of the experiment. 2nd C109 treatment early is defined between 19 and 22 h and 2nd C109 treatment late is defined between 22 and 46 h from the beginning of the experiment. The data shown are from 2 independent experiments. Black lines indicate mean ± SD. Asterisks denote significance by Paired samples T-test: N.S., not significant; *p ≤ 0.05 and **p ≤ 0.01.
Figure 7Single-cell analysis of B. cenocepacia cells treated with C109. (A) Total cell number (black line) and percentage of filamentous cells (red bars) for each time point during the time-lapse experiment. Data points are mean values of 8 different frames taken during two independent experiments. (B) Rates of cell division and lysis (mean ± SEM). Data points are mean values of different frames (n = 10) before, during and after C109 treatment, taken during two independent experiments. (C) Cell area measurements (μm2) of two-cells: cell dead by lysis (black line) and survivor filamentous cell (red line). The two cells are representative of 50 cells analyzed in two independent experiments.